What helps, what hinders?-Focus group findings on barriers and facilitators for mobile service robot use in a psychosocial group therapy for people with dementia.

IF 2.9 Q2 ROBOTICS
Frontiers in Robotics and AI Pub Date : 2024-06-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frobt.2024.1258847
Catharina Wasic, Robert Erzgräber, Manja Unger-Büttner, Carolin Donath, Hans-Joachim Böhme, Elmar Graessel
{"title":"What helps, what hinders?-Focus group findings on barriers and facilitators for mobile service robot use in a psychosocial group therapy for people with dementia.","authors":"Catharina Wasic, Robert Erzgräber, Manja Unger-Büttner, Carolin Donath, Hans-Joachim Böhme, Elmar Graessel","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2024.1258847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many countries are facing a shortage of healthcare workers. Furthermore, healthcare workers are experiencing many stressors, resulting in psychological issues, impaired health, and increased intentions to leave the workplace. In recent years, different technologies have been implemented to lighten workload on healthcare workers, such as electronic patient files. Robotic solutions are still rather uncommon. To help with acceptance and actual use of robots their functionalities should correspond to the users' needs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the pilot study Care4All-Initial, we developed and field-tested applications for a mobile service robot in a psychosocial, multimodal group therapy for people with dementia. To guide the process and assess possible facilitators and barriers, we conducted a reoccurring focus group including people with dementia, therapists, professional caregivers as well as researchers from different disciplines with a user-centered design approach. The focus group suggested and reviewed applications and discussed ethical implications. We recorded the focus group discussions in writing and used content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The focus group discussed 15 different topics regarding ethical concerns that we used as a framework for the research project: Ethical facilitators were respect for the autonomy of the people with dementia and their proxies regarding participating and data sharing. Furthermore, the robot had to be useful for the therapists and attendees. Ethical barriers were the deception and possible harm of the people with dementia or therapists. The focus group suggested 32 different applications. We implemented 13 applications that centered on the robot interacting with the people with dementia and lightening the workload off the therapists. The implemented applications were facilitated through utilizing existing hard- and software and building on applications. Barriers to implementation were due to hardware, software, or applications not fitting the scope of the project.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To prevent barriers of robot employment in a group therapy for people with dementia, the robot's applications have to be developed sufficiently for a flawless and safe use, the use of the robot should not cause irritation or agitation, but rather be meaningful and useful to its users. To facilitate the development sufficient time, money, expertise and planning is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1258847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many countries are facing a shortage of healthcare workers. Furthermore, healthcare workers are experiencing many stressors, resulting in psychological issues, impaired health, and increased intentions to leave the workplace. In recent years, different technologies have been implemented to lighten workload on healthcare workers, such as electronic patient files. Robotic solutions are still rather uncommon. To help with acceptance and actual use of robots their functionalities should correspond to the users' needs.

Method: In the pilot study Care4All-Initial, we developed and field-tested applications for a mobile service robot in a psychosocial, multimodal group therapy for people with dementia. To guide the process and assess possible facilitators and barriers, we conducted a reoccurring focus group including people with dementia, therapists, professional caregivers as well as researchers from different disciplines with a user-centered design approach. The focus group suggested and reviewed applications and discussed ethical implications. We recorded the focus group discussions in writing and used content analysis.

Results: The focus group discussed 15 different topics regarding ethical concerns that we used as a framework for the research project: Ethical facilitators were respect for the autonomy of the people with dementia and their proxies regarding participating and data sharing. Furthermore, the robot had to be useful for the therapists and attendees. Ethical barriers were the deception and possible harm of the people with dementia or therapists. The focus group suggested 32 different applications. We implemented 13 applications that centered on the robot interacting with the people with dementia and lightening the workload off the therapists. The implemented applications were facilitated through utilizing existing hard- and software and building on applications. Barriers to implementation were due to hardware, software, or applications not fitting the scope of the project.

Discussion: To prevent barriers of robot employment in a group therapy for people with dementia, the robot's applications have to be developed sufficiently for a flawless and safe use, the use of the robot should not cause irritation or agitation, but rather be meaningful and useful to its users. To facilitate the development sufficient time, money, expertise and planning is essential.

移动服务机器人在痴呆症患者社会心理团体治疗中的使用障碍和促进因素--焦点小组的研究结果。
导言:许多国家都面临着医护人员短缺的问题。此外,医护人员还承受着许多压力,导致心理问题、健康受损和离职意向增加。近年来,人们采用了不同的技术来减轻医护人员的工作量,例如电子病历。机器人解决方案仍相当少见。为了帮助人们接受和实际使用机器人,其功能应符合用户的需求:在 "全民护理"(Care4All-Initial)试点研究中,我们开发并实地测试了移动服务机器人在痴呆症患者社会心理多模式集体治疗中的应用。为了指导这一过程并评估可能存在的促进因素和障碍,我们采用以用户为中心的设计方法开展了一个重复性焦点小组,成员包括痴呆症患者、治疗师、专业护理人员以及来自不同学科的研究人员。焦点小组建议并审查了各种应用,还讨论了伦理方面的影响。我们对焦点小组的讨论进行了书面记录,并采用了内容分析法:焦点小组讨论了 15 个不同的伦理问题,我们将其作为研究项目的框架:伦理促进因素包括尊重痴呆症患者及其代理人在参与和数据共享方面的自主权。此外,机器人必须对治疗师和与会者有用。伦理障碍则是对痴呆症患者或治疗师的欺骗和可能伤害。焦点小组提出了 32 种不同的应用。我们实施了 13 种应用,其核心是让机器人与痴呆症患者互动,减轻治疗师的工作量。通过利用现有的硬件和软件,并在应用的基础上加以改进,这些应用得以顺利实施。实施过程中遇到的障碍主要是硬件、软件或应用程序与项目范围不符:为了防止在痴呆症患者的集体治疗中使用机器人时出现障碍,必须充分开发机器人的应用程序,以确保其使用的完美性和安全性,机器人的使用不应造成刺激或躁动,而应对用户有意义且有用。为了便于开发,充足的时间、资金、专业知识和规划是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
355
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信