Trauma centers: an underfunded but essential asset to the community.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001436
Joseph L Fracasso, Nasim Ahmed
{"title":"Trauma centers: an underfunded but essential asset to the community.","authors":"Joseph L Fracasso, Nasim Ahmed","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research indicates that specialized trauma centers, especially those of level I and II designation, can generate revenue if financial support is provided, and most importantly provide better outcomes for an injured patient by reducing length of stay and mortality when compared with treatment at hospitals without trauma center designation. Costs associated with trauma center operation have risen over the past few years in association with growing patient volumes and inflation. Documentation regarding costs for trauma center operations is sparse, and there exists a large variance between reported numbers based on their region. In most cases, the greatest proportion of funds are spent on clinical personnel while the smallest fraction is dedicated to educational and prevention programs. Studies confirm that as a product of these rising costs and a lack of state and federal funding that trauma centers remain uniquely financially vulnerable. Multiple strategies have been implemented to mitigate these costs but have proven insufficient. Legislations providing patients with expanded access to healthcare such as the Affordable Healthcare Act have failed to deliver on their intended purposes, and managed care organizations have moved to protect their own interest at the expense of trauma patient mortality. In lieu of concerted federal support, states and municipalities have explored solutions to support trauma centers such as small fees added to fines or encouraging charitable donations, although these programs have not seen ubiquitous implementation. Most trauma centers have begun incorporating activation costs to recoup losses from their low reimbursement rate, but these have continued to inflate, and pose a growing burden on vulnerable patients. Lack of funding from external sources such as state or federal appropriations poses a tangible threat to trauma centers for closure, and with multiple trauma centers acting as critical pillars of healthcare infrastructure for disadvantaged communities as well as the impact of this lack of funding being so broad and systemic, multiple 'trauma deserts' may emerge, leaving communities-especially disadvantaged communities which rely on the safety-net function of many high designation trauma centers-deprived of an essential treatment resource and increasing annual mortalities that could have otherwise been averted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research indicates that specialized trauma centers, especially those of level I and II designation, can generate revenue if financial support is provided, and most importantly provide better outcomes for an injured patient by reducing length of stay and mortality when compared with treatment at hospitals without trauma center designation. Costs associated with trauma center operation have risen over the past few years in association with growing patient volumes and inflation. Documentation regarding costs for trauma center operations is sparse, and there exists a large variance between reported numbers based on their region. In most cases, the greatest proportion of funds are spent on clinical personnel while the smallest fraction is dedicated to educational and prevention programs. Studies confirm that as a product of these rising costs and a lack of state and federal funding that trauma centers remain uniquely financially vulnerable. Multiple strategies have been implemented to mitigate these costs but have proven insufficient. Legislations providing patients with expanded access to healthcare such as the Affordable Healthcare Act have failed to deliver on their intended purposes, and managed care organizations have moved to protect their own interest at the expense of trauma patient mortality. In lieu of concerted federal support, states and municipalities have explored solutions to support trauma centers such as small fees added to fines or encouraging charitable donations, although these programs have not seen ubiquitous implementation. Most trauma centers have begun incorporating activation costs to recoup losses from their low reimbursement rate, but these have continued to inflate, and pose a growing burden on vulnerable patients. Lack of funding from external sources such as state or federal appropriations poses a tangible threat to trauma centers for closure, and with multiple trauma centers acting as critical pillars of healthcare infrastructure for disadvantaged communities as well as the impact of this lack of funding being so broad and systemic, multiple 'trauma deserts' may emerge, leaving communities-especially disadvantaged communities which rely on the safety-net function of many high designation trauma centers-deprived of an essential treatment resource and increasing annual mortalities that could have otherwise been averted.

创伤中心:资金不足但却是社区的重要资产。
研究表明,专科创伤中心,特别是那些被指定为一级和二级创伤中心的医院,如果得到财政支持,可以创造收入,最重要的是,与没有被指定为创伤中心的医院相比,可以缩短住院时间,降低死亡率,从而为受伤病人提供更好的治疗效果。在过去几年中,随着病人数量的增加和通货膨胀,与创伤中心运营相关的成本也在上升。有关创伤中心运营成本的文献资料很少,而且不同地区的报告数字也存在很大差异。在大多数情况下,最大一部分资金用于临床人员,而最小一部分用于教育和预防项目。研究证实,由于成本上升以及缺乏州政府和联邦政府的资金支持,创伤中心的财政状况依然十分脆弱。已经实施了多种策略来降低这些成本,但事实证明这些策略还不够。平价医疗法案》(Affordable Healthcare Act)等为患者提供更多医疗服务的立法未能实现其预期目的,管理性医疗机构为保护自身利益,不惜牺牲创伤患者的死亡率。在联邦的一致支持下,各州和各市探索了支持创伤中心的解决方案,如在罚款中加入小额费用或鼓励慈善捐款,尽管这些计划并未得到普遍实施。大多数创伤中心已开始纳入激活成本,以弥补因报销率低而造成的损失,但这些成本持续上升,给弱势病人造成了越来越大的负担。由于多个创伤中心是弱势社区医疗保健基础设施的重要支柱,而且缺乏资金的影响如此广泛和系统,可能会出现多个 "创伤沙漠",使社区(尤其是依赖于许多高指定创伤中心的安全网功能的弱势社区)失去重要的治疗资源,并增加原本可以避免的年度死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信