Women's experience of adopting lateral positions during the second stage of labour compared with conventional lithotomy positions: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jing Huang , Yu Zang , Minghui Yang , Jianying Wang , Yinchu Hu , Xue Feng , Lihua Ren , Hong Lu
{"title":"Women's experience of adopting lateral positions during the second stage of labour compared with conventional lithotomy positions: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Jing Huang ,&nbsp;Yu Zang ,&nbsp;Minghui Yang ,&nbsp;Jianying Wang ,&nbsp;Yinchu Hu ,&nbsp;Xue Feng ,&nbsp;Lihua Ren ,&nbsp;Hong Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Maternal positions during childbirth play an important role in safe vaginal births and might also influence women's childbirth experiences greatly. Lateral positions, as a potential position to reduce negative maternal and neonatal outcomes, have become popular in recent years, especially in China where the adoption of conventional lithotomy positions is still common. However, the childbirth experience of those who gave birth in lateral positions has been rarely studied. This study aimed to describe and compare women's childbirth experiences of adopting the newly introduced lateral positions and the conventional lithotomy positions during the second stage of labour.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in China involving a total of 658 primiparous and parous women who adopted lateral and lithotomy positions during the second stage of labour from July to November 2020. Sociodemographic characteristics, maternal and neonatal outcomes as well as childbirth experience assessed by the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) were collected. This study followed the STROBE guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Women who once adopted lateral positions during the second stage of labour had better positive childbirth experiences compared with those in the lithotomy positions group, as demonstrated by their overall higher CEQ scores. Women in the lateral position group also reported better participation and perceived safety, and a greater sense of control during childbirth. Lateral positions remained an influential factor in CEQ scores after controlling for potential confounders. In this study, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were rare. Women in lateral positions had comparatively better perineal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study described and compared women's childbirth experiences of adopting conventional lithotomy positions and lateral positions during the second stage of labour using a valid instrument. Women who adopted lateral positions during the second stage of labour reported better childbirth experiences than those giving birth in the conventional lithotomy positions. Thus, assisting women in giving birth in lateral positions might be a promising way to improve women's childbirth experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Maternal positions during childbirth play an important role in safe vaginal births and might also influence women's childbirth experiences greatly. Lateral positions, as a potential position to reduce negative maternal and neonatal outcomes, have become popular in recent years, especially in China where the adoption of conventional lithotomy positions is still common. However, the childbirth experience of those who gave birth in lateral positions has been rarely studied. This study aimed to describe and compare women's childbirth experiences of adopting the newly introduced lateral positions and the conventional lithotomy positions during the second stage of labour.

Study design

A cross-sectional study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in China involving a total of 658 primiparous and parous women who adopted lateral and lithotomy positions during the second stage of labour from July to November 2020. Sociodemographic characteristics, maternal and neonatal outcomes as well as childbirth experience assessed by the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) were collected. This study followed the STROBE guidelines.

Results

Women who once adopted lateral positions during the second stage of labour had better positive childbirth experiences compared with those in the lithotomy positions group, as demonstrated by their overall higher CEQ scores. Women in the lateral position group also reported better participation and perceived safety, and a greater sense of control during childbirth. Lateral positions remained an influential factor in CEQ scores after controlling for potential confounders. In this study, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were rare. Women in lateral positions had comparatively better perineal outcomes.

Conclusion

This study described and compared women's childbirth experiences of adopting conventional lithotomy positions and lateral positions during the second stage of labour using a valid instrument. Women who adopted lateral positions during the second stage of labour reported better childbirth experiences than those giving birth in the conventional lithotomy positions. Thus, assisting women in giving birth in lateral positions might be a promising way to improve women's childbirth experience.

产妇在第二产程中采用侧卧位与传统平卧位的比较:横断面研究。
目的:分娩时的产妇体位在阴道安全分娩中起着重要作用,同时也可能极大地影响产妇的分娩体验。侧卧位作为一种可能减少产妇和新生儿不良结局的体位,近年来开始流行起来,尤其是在中国,采用传统的平卧位仍然很普遍。然而,很少有人研究过采用侧卧位分娩的产妇的分娩经历。本研究旨在描述和比较产妇在第二产程中采用新引入的侧卧位和传统碎石位的分娩体验:研究设计:在中国两家三级医院进行了一项横断面研究,共涉及 658 名初产妇和准妈妈,她们在 2020 年 7 月至 11 月的第二产程中采用了侧卧位和碎石位。研究收集了社会人口学特征、孕产妇和新生儿结局以及通过分娩体验问卷(CEQ)评估的分娩体验。这项研究遵循了 STROBE 指南:结果:在第二产程中采用侧卧位的产妇与采用平卧位的产妇相比,有更好的积极分娩体验,这体现在她们的 CEQ 总分更高。侧卧位组的产妇还表示,她们在分娩过程中的参与度和安全感更高,控制感更强。在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,侧卧位仍是影响CEQ评分的一个因素。在这项研究中,孕产妇和新生儿的不良结局并不多见。侧卧位产妇的会阴结果相对较好:本研究使用有效的工具描述并比较了产妇在第二产程中采用传统平卧位和侧卧位的分娩体验。在第二产程中采用侧卧位分娩的产妇比采用传统切开术分娩的产妇有更好的分娩体验。因此,帮助产妇采用侧卧位分娩可能是改善产妇分娩体验的一种有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信