Lumbar disk herniation in pregnancy: its incidence, presentation and management: a systematic review.

Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-21 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.21037/jss-24-3
Nanette Y Chan, Michael Le, Sophie Reinecker, Morgan Prince, Geoffrey T Murphy
{"title":"Lumbar disk herniation in pregnancy: its incidence, presentation and management: a systematic review.","authors":"Nanette Y Chan, Michael Le, Sophie Reinecker, Morgan Prince, Geoffrey T Murphy","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Back pain in pregnancy is common, but pain from lumbar disk herniations in pregnancy is rare. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyse literature on lumbar disk herniation in pregnancy, focusing on risk factors, incidence, clinical presentation, and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature review using PubMed and Web of Science databases, including studies from January 1, 1950, to August 1, 2023. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for cohort studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for case-control studies were utilised to assess risk of bias. The review protocol was not previously published.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 studies were reviewed, with 6 addressing incidence and risk factors and 35 focusing on clinical presentation and management. Symptomatic lumbar disk herniation during pregnancy was found to be uncommon, with no significant predisposition noted during pregnancy as per magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. However, patients with MRI-detected herniations were more likely to report back pain. Non-surgical management resulted in higher rates of complete symptom resolution (69% <i>vs.</i> 50%) and lower rates of cesarean section (57% <i>vs.</i> 70%) compared to surgical management. Among surgically treated patients, microdiscectomy showed higher symptom resolution (59%) compared to laminectomy (17%) or a combined approach (33%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While pregnancy does not inherently increase the risk of herniated lumbar disks, the presence of a prolapsed disk can predispose to back pain during pregnancy. There is poor quality evidence that should be interpreted cautiously. Non-surgical management, in the absence of red-flag symptoms including bowel and bladder dysfunction may be trialled and yield comparatively better symptom resolution. Additionally, surgical management if necessitated has no clear link to pregnancy complications within the scope of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 2","pages":"274-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Back pain in pregnancy is common, but pain from lumbar disk herniations in pregnancy is rare. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyse literature on lumbar disk herniation in pregnancy, focusing on risk factors, incidence, clinical presentation, and management.

Methods: We conducted a literature review using PubMed and Web of Science databases, including studies from January 1, 1950, to August 1, 2023. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for cohort studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for case-control studies were utilised to assess risk of bias. The review protocol was not previously published.

Results: A total of 41 studies were reviewed, with 6 addressing incidence and risk factors and 35 focusing on clinical presentation and management. Symptomatic lumbar disk herniation during pregnancy was found to be uncommon, with no significant predisposition noted during pregnancy as per magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. However, patients with MRI-detected herniations were more likely to report back pain. Non-surgical management resulted in higher rates of complete symptom resolution (69% vs. 50%) and lower rates of cesarean section (57% vs. 70%) compared to surgical management. Among surgically treated patients, microdiscectomy showed higher symptom resolution (59%) compared to laminectomy (17%) or a combined approach (33%).

Conclusions: While pregnancy does not inherently increase the risk of herniated lumbar disks, the presence of a prolapsed disk can predispose to back pain during pregnancy. There is poor quality evidence that should be interpreted cautiously. Non-surgical management, in the absence of red-flag symptoms including bowel and bladder dysfunction may be trialled and yield comparatively better symptom resolution. Additionally, surgical management if necessitated has no clear link to pregnancy complications within the scope of this study.

妊娠期腰椎间盘突出症:发病率、表现和治疗:系统综述。
背景:妊娠期背痛很常见,但妊娠期腰椎间盘突出症引起的疼痛却很少见。本系统综述旨在全面分析有关妊娠期腰椎间盘突出症的文献,重点关注风险因素、发病率、临床表现和处理方法:我们使用 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了文献综述,包括 1950 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 1 日期间的研究。在评估偏倚风险时,我们采用了针对队列研究的 "批判性评估技能计划"(CASP)核对表和针对病例对照研究的 "乔安娜-布里格斯研究所批判性评估核对表"。综述方案此前未曾公布:结果:共审查了 41 项研究,其中 6 项涉及发病率和风险因素,35 项侧重于临床表现和管理。研究发现,妊娠期有症状的腰椎间盘突出症并不常见,根据磁共振成像(MRI)结果,妊娠期并无明显的易感性。然而,磁共振成像检查出腰椎间盘突出症的患者更有可能报告腰痛。与手术治疗相比,非手术治疗的症状完全缓解率更高(69% 对 50%),剖腹产率更低(57% 对 70%)。在接受手术治疗的患者中,显微椎间盘切除术的症状缓解率(59%)高于椎板切除术(17%)或联合方法(33%):结论:虽然怀孕本身不会增加腰椎间盘突出症的风险,但腰椎间盘突出症的存在可能导致孕期腰痛。目前的证据质量不高,应谨慎解读。在没有包括肠道和膀胱功能障碍在内的明显症状的情况下,可试用非手术疗法,其症状缓解效果相对较好。此外,在本研究范围内,必要时进行手术治疗与妊娠并发症并无明显联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信