What are the Protocols and Resources for Sport-Related Concussion Among Top National Collegiate Athletic Association Football Programs? A Cross-Sectional Survey of A5 Schools.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
James R Clugston, Kelsey Diemer, Sarah L Chrabaszcz, Connor C Long, Jacob Jo, Douglas P Terry, Scott L Zuckerman, Robert Warne Fitch
{"title":"What are the Protocols and Resources for Sport-Related Concussion Among Top National Collegiate Athletic Association Football Programs? A Cross-Sectional Survey of A5 Schools.","authors":"James R Clugston, Kelsey Diemer, Sarah L Chrabaszcz, Connor C Long, Jacob Jo, Douglas P Terry, Scott L Zuckerman, Robert Warne Fitch","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study summarizes findings from a cross-sectional survey conducted among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division 1 football programs, focusing on sport-related concussion (SRC) protocols for the 2018 season.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>65 football programs within the Autonomy Five (A5) NCAA conferences.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Athletic trainers and team physicians who attended a football safety meeting at the NCAA offices June 17 to 18, 2019, representing their respective institutions.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Electronic surveys were distributed on June 14, 2019, before the football safety meeting.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Results for 16 unique questions involving SRC protocols and resources were summarized and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey garnered responses from 46 of 65 programs (response rate = 71%). For baseline testing, 98% measured baseline postural stability and balance, 87% used baseline neurocognitive testing, while only 61% assessed baseline vestibular and/or ocular function. Regarding concussion prevention, 51% did not recommend additional measures, while 4% and 24% recommended cervical compression collars and omega-3 supplementation, respectively. In postconcussion treatment, 26% initiated aerobic exercise 1 day postconcussion if symptoms were stable, 24% waited at least 48 hours, 4% waited for the athlete to return to baseline, 11% waited until the athlete became asymptomatic, and 35% determined procedures on a case-by-case basis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most institutions assessed postural stability/balance and neurocognitive functioning at baseline and introduced light aerobic exercise within 48 h postconcussion. There was variation in baseline assessment methods and concussion prevention recommendations. These survey findings deepen our understanding of diverse SRC protocols in NCAA football programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001241","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study summarizes findings from a cross-sectional survey conducted among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division 1 football programs, focusing on sport-related concussion (SRC) protocols for the 2018 season.

Design: Cross-sectional survey study.

Setting: 65 football programs within the Autonomy Five (A5) NCAA conferences.

Participants: Athletic trainers and team physicians who attended a football safety meeting at the NCAA offices June 17 to 18, 2019, representing their respective institutions.

Intervention: Electronic surveys were distributed on June 14, 2019, before the football safety meeting.

Main outcome measures: Results for 16 unique questions involving SRC protocols and resources were summarized and evaluated.

Results: The survey garnered responses from 46 of 65 programs (response rate = 71%). For baseline testing, 98% measured baseline postural stability and balance, 87% used baseline neurocognitive testing, while only 61% assessed baseline vestibular and/or ocular function. Regarding concussion prevention, 51% did not recommend additional measures, while 4% and 24% recommended cervical compression collars and omega-3 supplementation, respectively. In postconcussion treatment, 26% initiated aerobic exercise 1 day postconcussion if symptoms were stable, 24% waited at least 48 hours, 4% waited for the athlete to return to baseline, 11% waited until the athlete became asymptomatic, and 35% determined procedures on a case-by-case basis.

Conclusions: Most institutions assessed postural stability/balance and neurocognitive functioning at baseline and introduced light aerobic exercise within 48 h postconcussion. There was variation in baseline assessment methods and concussion prevention recommendations. These survey findings deepen our understanding of diverse SRC protocols in NCAA football programs.

全国大学生体育协会顶级足球项目中与运动相关的脑震荡有哪些规程和资源?对 A5 学校的横向调查。
目标:本研究总结了在美国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联盟足球项目中开展的横断面调查的结果,重点关注2018赛季与运动相关的脑震荡(SRC)协议:设计:横断面调查研究:65个NCAA五大联盟(A5)中的足球项目:运动训练员和队医,他们代表各自的机构参加了2019年6月17日至18日在NCAA办公室举行的足球安全会议:主要结果测量:对涉及 SRC 协议和资源的 16 个独特问题的结果进行了总结和评估:调查获得了 65 个项目中 46 个项目的回复(回复率 = 71%)。在基线测试方面,98%的项目测量了基线姿势稳定性和平衡性,87%的项目使用了基线神经认知测试,而只有61%的项目评估了基线前庭和/或眼部功能。在脑震荡预防方面,51%的人不建议采取其他措施,而分别有4%和24%的人建议使用颈椎加压项圈和补充欧米伽-3。在脑震荡后治疗方面,26%的机构在脑震荡后1天症状稳定的情况下开始有氧运动,24%的机构至少等待48小时,4%的机构等待运动员恢复到基线状态,11%的机构等待运动员无症状,35%的机构根据具体情况决定治疗程序:大多数机构在基线评估姿势稳定性/平衡性和神经认知功能,并在脑震荡后 48 小时内引入轻度有氧运动。基线评估方法和脑震荡预防建议存在差异。这些调查结果加深了我们对 NCAA 足球项目中各种 SRC 方案的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信