Prognostic Value of Novel CARWL Score in Stage IIIC Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Canadian respiratory journal Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/2803044
Erkan Topkan, Ahmet Kucuk, Duriye Ozturk, Emine Elif Ozkan, Ali Ayberk Besen, Berrin Pehlivan, Ugur Selek
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Novel CARWL Score in Stage IIIC Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.","authors":"Erkan Topkan, Ahmet Kucuk, Duriye Ozturk, Emine Elif Ozkan, Ali Ayberk Besen, Berrin Pehlivan, Ugur Selek","doi":"10.1155/2024/2803044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We explored the prognostic utility of the unique combination of C-reactive-protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) and significant weight loss (WL > 5%) over the preceding 6 months, namely, the CARWL score, in stage IIIC non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each patient, the CAR was calculated using C-reactive protein and albumin measurements obtained on the first day of CCRT: CAR = C-reactive protein ÷ albumin. The availability of an ideal CAR cutoff that may categorize patients into two distinct progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes was explored by employing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patients were additionally divided into two groups based on their status of significant WL according to the well-recognized Delphi criteria. Then, the CARWL score was created by combining all feasible combinations of the CAR and significant WL groupings. The potential links between pretreatment CARWL groups and the post-CCRT OS and PFS outcomes were determined as the primary and secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective cohort study comprised a total of 651 stage IIIC NSCLC patients. ROC curve analysis indicated that rounded 3.0 was the ideal CAR cutoff (area under the curve (AUC): 70.1%; sensitivity: 67.8%; specificity: 65.9%), which categorized the patients into CAR < 3.0 (<i>N</i> = 324) and CAR ≥ 3.0 (<i>N</i> = 327) groups. There were 308 (47.3%) and 343 (52.7%) patients without and with significant WL, respectively. The created CARWL groups were CARWL-0: CAR < 3.0 and WL ≤ 5.0%; CARWL-1: CAR < 3.0 and WL > 5.0%, or CAR ≥ 3.0 and WL ≤ 5.0%; and CARWL-2: CAR > 3.0 and WL > 5.0%. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the PFS (14.2 vs. 11.4 vs. 7.5 months; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and OS (37.3 vs. 23.6 vs. 12.8 months; <i>P</i> < 0.001) durations were gradually and significantly lowered from the CARWL-0 to CARWL-2 groups. The CARWL score's significant impacts on PFS and OS outcomes were found to be independent of the other variables in the multivariate analysis (<i>P</i> < 0.001, for each).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that the novel CARWL score, which accounts for pretreatment CAR and significant WL during the preceding 6 months, can reliably stratify newly diagnosed stage IIIC NSCLC patients into three groups with significantly different PFS and OS after definitive CCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":9416,"journal":{"name":"Canadian respiratory journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian respiratory journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2803044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We explored the prognostic utility of the unique combination of C-reactive-protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) and significant weight loss (WL > 5%) over the preceding 6 months, namely, the CARWL score, in stage IIIC non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Methods: For each patient, the CAR was calculated using C-reactive protein and albumin measurements obtained on the first day of CCRT: CAR = C-reactive protein ÷ albumin. The availability of an ideal CAR cutoff that may categorize patients into two distinct progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes was explored by employing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patients were additionally divided into two groups based on their status of significant WL according to the well-recognized Delphi criteria. Then, the CARWL score was created by combining all feasible combinations of the CAR and significant WL groupings. The potential links between pretreatment CARWL groups and the post-CCRT OS and PFS outcomes were determined as the primary and secondary endpoints.

Results: This retrospective cohort study comprised a total of 651 stage IIIC NSCLC patients. ROC curve analysis indicated that rounded 3.0 was the ideal CAR cutoff (area under the curve (AUC): 70.1%; sensitivity: 67.8%; specificity: 65.9%), which categorized the patients into CAR < 3.0 (N = 324) and CAR ≥ 3.0 (N = 327) groups. There were 308 (47.3%) and 343 (52.7%) patients without and with significant WL, respectively. The created CARWL groups were CARWL-0: CAR < 3.0 and WL ≤ 5.0%; CARWL-1: CAR < 3.0 and WL > 5.0%, or CAR ≥ 3.0 and WL ≤ 5.0%; and CARWL-2: CAR > 3.0 and WL > 5.0%. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the PFS (14.2 vs. 11.4 vs. 7.5 months; P < 0.001) and OS (37.3 vs. 23.6 vs. 12.8 months; P < 0.001) durations were gradually and significantly lowered from the CARWL-0 to CARWL-2 groups. The CARWL score's significant impacts on PFS and OS outcomes were found to be independent of the other variables in the multivariate analysis (P < 0.001, for each).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the novel CARWL score, which accounts for pretreatment CAR and significant WL during the preceding 6 months, can reliably stratify newly diagnosed stage IIIC NSCLC patients into three groups with significantly different PFS and OS after definitive CCRT.

新型 CARWL 评分对同时接受化疗放疗的 IIIC 期非小细胞肺癌患者的预后价值
研究目的我们探讨了在接受同期化疗(CCRT)的IIIC期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值(CAR)和前6个月体重显著下降(WL > 5%)的独特组合,即CARWL评分的预后效用:方法:每位患者的 CAR 分值均根据 CCRT 第一天获得的 C 反应蛋白和白蛋白测量值计算得出:CAR = C 反应蛋白 ÷ 白蛋白。通过接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)分析,探讨了是否有一个理想的CAR分界线,可将患者分为两种不同的无进展(PFS)和总生存(OS)结果。此外,根据公认的德尔菲(Delphi)标准,根据患者的显著 WL 状态将其分为两组。然后,结合 CAR 和显著 WL 分组的所有可行组合,得出 CARWL 评分。将治疗前CARWL分组与CCRT后OS和PFS结果之间的潜在联系作为主要和次要终点:这项回顾性队列研究共纳入了 651 例 IIIC 期 NSCLC 患者。ROC曲线分析表明,圆形 3.0 是理想的 CAR 临界值(曲线下面积 (AUC):70.1%;灵敏度:67.0%):70.1%;灵敏度:67.8%;特异性:65.9%),将患者分为 CAR N = 324 组和 CAR ≥ 3.0 组(N = 327)。无明显 WL 和有明显 WL 的患者分别为 308 人(47.3%)和 343 人(52.7%)。创建的 CARWL 组为 CARWL-0:CAR 5.0%,或 CAR ≥ 3.0 且 WL ≤ 5.0%;CARWL-2:CAR > 3.0 且 WL > 5.0%。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,从CARWL-0组到CARWL-2组,PFS(14.2个月 vs. 11.4个月 vs. 7.5个月;P < 0.001)和OS(37.3个月 vs. 23.6个月 vs. 12.8个月;P < 0.001)持续时间逐渐显著缩短。在多变量分析中发现,CARWL评分对PFS和OS结果的显著影响与其他变量无关(P<0.001):我们的研究结果表明,新的CARWL评分考虑了治疗前的CAR和前6个月的显著WL,可以可靠地将新诊断的IIIC期NSCLC患者分为三组,三组患者在接受明确的CCRT治疗后的PFS和OS显著不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian respiratory journal
Canadian respiratory journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Respiratory Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a multidisciplinary forum for research in all areas of respiratory medicine. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to asthma, allergy, COPD, non-invasive ventilation, therapeutic intervention, lung cancer, airway and lung infections, as well as any other respiratory diseases.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信