A Randomized Trial of the Impact of Ferric Citrate on Erythropoietin and Intravenous Iron Use in Patients Receiving Dialysis.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
American Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1159/000540227
Geoffrey A Block, Mohammed Reza Mizani, Varshasb Broumand, F David Newby, Ayodele Erinle, Carolina Arias, Martha Block, Stephanie Brillhart, Amanda Leppink, Mark Danese, Mary Dittrich
{"title":"A Randomized Trial of the Impact of Ferric Citrate on Erythropoietin and Intravenous Iron Use in Patients Receiving Dialysis.","authors":"Geoffrey A Block, Mohammed Reza Mizani, Varshasb Broumand, F David Newby, Ayodele Erinle, Carolina Arias, Martha Block, Stephanie Brillhart, Amanda Leppink, Mark Danese, Mary Dittrich","doi":"10.1159/000540227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ferric citrate (FC) is an FDA-approved iron-based phosphate binder for adults with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. This study investigated the impact of FC as the primary phosphate-lowering therapy on utilization of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (IV) iron.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study (NCT04922645), patients on dialysis and receiving ESAs were randomized to receive FC or remain on standard of care (SOC) phosphate-lowering therapy for up to 6 months. Primary endpoints were the difference in change from baseline to efficacy evaluation period (EEP) in mean monthly ESA and IV iron doses. Secondary endpoints included treatment differences in hemoglobin, phosphate, TSAT, and ferritin levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred nine patients were randomized to FC and had a day 1 dosing visit (n = 103) or SOC (n = 106). The two groups had similar baseline laboratory characteristics; however, atherosclerotic CV disease, peripheral vascular disease, and congestive heart failure were more common in the SOC group. The mean treatment difference in ESA monthly dose was -30.8 μg (FC vs. SOC; p = 0.02). An absolute though non-statistically significant change in mean monthly IV iron dose of -37.2 mg (p = 0.17) was observed with FC. Mean hemoglobin, TSAT, and ferritin all increased from baseline to the EEP with FC versus SOC. Serious adverse events occurred in 28% of patients receiving FC versus 37% in those receiving SOC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients receiving dialysis, treatment with FC as compared to remaining on SOC phosphate binders resulted in reductions in mean monthly ESA and IV iron dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ferric citrate (FC) is an FDA-approved iron-based phosphate binder for adults with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. This study investigated the impact of FC as the primary phosphate-lowering therapy on utilization of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (IV) iron.

Methods: In this randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study (NCT04922645), patients on dialysis and receiving ESAs were randomized to receive FC or remain on standard of care (SOC) phosphate-lowering therapy for up to 6 months. Primary endpoints were the difference in change from baseline to efficacy evaluation period (EEP) in mean monthly ESA and IV iron doses. Secondary endpoints included treatment differences in hemoglobin, phosphate, TSAT, and ferritin levels.

Results: Two hundred nine patients were randomized to FC and had a day 1 dosing visit (n = 103) or SOC (n = 106). The two groups had similar baseline laboratory characteristics; however, atherosclerotic CV disease, peripheral vascular disease, and congestive heart failure were more common in the SOC group. The mean treatment difference in ESA monthly dose was -30.8 μg (FC vs. SOC; p = 0.02). An absolute though non-statistically significant change in mean monthly IV iron dose of -37.2 mg (p = 0.17) was observed with FC. Mean hemoglobin, TSAT, and ferritin all increased from baseline to the EEP with FC versus SOC. Serious adverse events occurred in 28% of patients receiving FC versus 37% in those receiving SOC.

Conclusions: In patients receiving dialysis, treatment with FC as compared to remaining on SOC phosphate binders resulted in reductions in mean monthly ESA and IV iron dose.

枸橼酸铁对透析患者促红细胞生成素和静脉注射铁剂的影响的随机试验。
简介:柠檬酸铁(FC)是美国食品及药物管理局(FDA)批准用于透析依赖型慢性肾病成人患者的铁基磷酸盐结合剂。本研究调查了枸橼酸铁作为主要降磷疗法对使用红细胞生成刺激剂(ESAs)和静脉注射铁剂的影响:在这项随机、开放标签、主动对照、多中心研究(NCT04922645)中,接受ESAs的透析患者被随机分配接受FC治疗或继续接受标准护理(SOC)降磷治疗长达6个月。主要终点是平均每月ESA和静脉注射铁剂量从基线到疗效评估期(EEP)的变化差异。次要终点包括血红蛋白、磷酸盐、TSAT和铁蛋白水平的治疗差异。结果:209名患者被随机分配到FC组,并进行了第1天用药访视(103人)或SOC组(106人)。两组患者的基线实验室特征相似,但在 SOC 组中,动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病、外周血管疾病和充血性心力衰竭更为常见。ESA月剂量的平均治疗差异为-30.8微克(FC vs SOC;P=0.02)。FC 组的平均静脉注射铁剂月剂量绝对值为-37.2 毫克(P=0.17),但无统计学意义。FC 与 SOC 相比,从基线到 EEP 期间的平均血红蛋白、TSAT 和铁蛋白均有所增加。接受 FC 治疗的患者中发生严重不良事件的比例为 28%,而接受 SOC 治疗的患者中发生严重不良事件的比例为 37%:在接受透析的患者中,与继续使用 SOC 磷酸盐结合剂相比,使用 FC 治疗可减少每月平均 ESA 和静脉注射铁剂的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信