Inconsistency of parsimony under the multispecies coalescent

Daniel Rickert, Wai-Tong Fan, Matthew Hahn
{"title":"Inconsistency of parsimony under the multispecies coalescent","authors":"Daniel Rickert, Wai-Tong Fan, Matthew Hahn","doi":"arxiv-2407.02634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While it is known that parsimony can be statistically inconsistent under\ncertain models of evolution due to high levels of homoplasy, the consistency of\nparsimony under the multispecies coalescent (MSC) is less well studied.\nPrevious studies have shown the consistency of concatenated parsimony\n(parsimony applied to concatenated alignments) under the MSC for the rooted\n4-taxa case under an infinite-sites model of mutation; on the other hand, other\nwork has also established the inconsistency of concatenated parsimony for the\nunrooted 6-taxa case. These seemingly contradictory results suggest that\nconcatenated parsimony may fail to be consistent for trees with more than 5\ntaxa, for all unrooted trees, or for some combination of the two. Here, we\npresent a technique for computing the expected internal branch lengths of gene\ntrees under the MSC. This technique allows us to determine the regions of the\nparameter space of the species tree under which concatenated parsimony fails\nfor different numbers of taxa, for rooted or unrooted trees. We use our new\napproach to demonstrate that there are always regions of statistical\ninconsistency for concatenated parsimony for the 5- and 6-taxa cases,\nregardless of rooting. Our results therefore suggest that parsimony is not\ngenerally dependable under the MSC.","PeriodicalId":501044,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.02634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While it is known that parsimony can be statistically inconsistent under certain models of evolution due to high levels of homoplasy, the consistency of parsimony under the multispecies coalescent (MSC) is less well studied. Previous studies have shown the consistency of concatenated parsimony (parsimony applied to concatenated alignments) under the MSC for the rooted 4-taxa case under an infinite-sites model of mutation; on the other hand, other work has also established the inconsistency of concatenated parsimony for the unrooted 6-taxa case. These seemingly contradictory results suggest that concatenated parsimony may fail to be consistent for trees with more than 5 taxa, for all unrooted trees, or for some combination of the two. Here, we present a technique for computing the expected internal branch lengths of gene trees under the MSC. This technique allows us to determine the regions of the parameter space of the species tree under which concatenated parsimony fails for different numbers of taxa, for rooted or unrooted trees. We use our new approach to demonstrate that there are always regions of statistical inconsistency for concatenated parsimony for the 5- and 6-taxa cases, regardless of rooting. Our results therefore suggest that parsimony is not generally dependable under the MSC.
多物种聚合下的解析不一致性
众所周知,在某些进化模型下,由于高水平的同源性,解析在统计上可能是不一致的,但在多物种凝聚(MSC)下解析的一致性却没有得到很好的研究。以前的研究表明,在无穷位点突变模型下,多物种聚合(MSC)下的连贯解析(解析应用于连贯排列)在有根4-axa情况下是一致的;另一方面,其他研究也证实了无根6-axa情况下连贯解析的不一致性。这些看似矛盾的结果表明,对于 5 塔以上的树,对于所有无根树,或者对于两者的某种组合,连接解析法都可能不一致。在这里,我们提出了一种计算 MSC 下基因树预期内部分支长度的技术。通过这种技术,我们可以确定物种树参数空间的哪些区域,在这些区域中,对于有根或无根的树,不同类群数的并合解析都会失败。我们使用新方法证明,在 5 个和 6 个类群的情况下,无论是否扎根,都存在统计不一致的区域。因此,我们的结果表明,在 MSC 条件下,解析法并不普遍可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信