Passerines use of maize crop in addition to reedbed in autumn: abundance, diet and food availability in anthropogenic wetland

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Philippe Fontanilles, Jean Marc Fourcade, Iván de la Hera, Christian Kerbiriou
{"title":"Passerines use of maize crop in addition to reedbed in autumn: abundance, diet and food availability in anthropogenic wetland","authors":"Philippe Fontanilles, Jean Marc Fourcade, Iván de la Hera, Christian Kerbiriou","doi":"10.1007/s11273-024-09996-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wetland habitats experienced a dramatic reduction and fragmentation of biodiversity, because of human activities such as urbanization and agriculture. Now birds, as indicator of this biodiversity, have to breed, winter or stopover in wetlands embedded in a complex and highly altered human matrix. They may concentrate their activities in the wet remnant (wet reedbed) or suboptimal habitats (dry reedbed) and surroundings such as agricultural fields (maize). In a wide wetland area situated south-west of France in a main migration route, we tested if the abundance of passerine species differs among habitats according to their specialization and ecology (wet reedbed vs dry habitats; aquatics vs generalists; migrant vs local), We attempt to identify the underlying mechanisms of observed variation, looking at: arthropod availability in each habitat, bird diet of five insectivorous species and refuelling capacity of birds. Maize crops hosted more invertebrates and biomass than reedbeds for Coleoptera, Diptera, Araneida and Cicadellidae. This may explain why crops were used by aquatic passerines (Bluethroat, Sedge warblers, Reed warblers), migrant or local generalists (Robin, Blue tit, Great tit, Willow Warblers and Nightingale). Bluethroat’s diet was more focused on Formicidae and used the both habitats. In spite of the available food in maize, specialist birds preferred reedbed: Cetti warbler feeding in mainly Araneida and Cicadellidae; Sedge warbler Aphid and Coleoptera. Dry reedbed were better used by Grasshopper Warblers foraging Formicidae. Sedge and Reed warblers were more abundant in wet reedbed. We also noted for this last species youngs refuelling in maize crop. Therefore, the strategy to use maize crop may be different if resident or migrant. Generalist resident may disperse searching for food or transit area in continuity of vegetation; migrant need refuelling, particularly the aquatic trans-saharans more specialist on reedbed than the others. Finally, maize crop provided food resources and suitable shelter for a large group of species. It may be a supplement habitat of the wet and dry reedbeds, but not a substitute. Our study reaffirms to conserve and extend wet reedbed habitats threatened by clogging bush encroachment and drying.</p>","PeriodicalId":49363,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands Ecology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-024-09996-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wetland habitats experienced a dramatic reduction and fragmentation of biodiversity, because of human activities such as urbanization and agriculture. Now birds, as indicator of this biodiversity, have to breed, winter or stopover in wetlands embedded in a complex and highly altered human matrix. They may concentrate their activities in the wet remnant (wet reedbed) or suboptimal habitats (dry reedbed) and surroundings such as agricultural fields (maize). In a wide wetland area situated south-west of France in a main migration route, we tested if the abundance of passerine species differs among habitats according to their specialization and ecology (wet reedbed vs dry habitats; aquatics vs generalists; migrant vs local), We attempt to identify the underlying mechanisms of observed variation, looking at: arthropod availability in each habitat, bird diet of five insectivorous species and refuelling capacity of birds. Maize crops hosted more invertebrates and biomass than reedbeds for Coleoptera, Diptera, Araneida and Cicadellidae. This may explain why crops were used by aquatic passerines (Bluethroat, Sedge warblers, Reed warblers), migrant or local generalists (Robin, Blue tit, Great tit, Willow Warblers and Nightingale). Bluethroat’s diet was more focused on Formicidae and used the both habitats. In spite of the available food in maize, specialist birds preferred reedbed: Cetti warbler feeding in mainly Araneida and Cicadellidae; Sedge warbler Aphid and Coleoptera. Dry reedbed were better used by Grasshopper Warblers foraging Formicidae. Sedge and Reed warblers were more abundant in wet reedbed. We also noted for this last species youngs refuelling in maize crop. Therefore, the strategy to use maize crop may be different if resident or migrant. Generalist resident may disperse searching for food or transit area in continuity of vegetation; migrant need refuelling, particularly the aquatic trans-saharans more specialist on reedbed than the others. Finally, maize crop provided food resources and suitable shelter for a large group of species. It may be a supplement habitat of the wet and dry reedbeds, but not a substitute. Our study reaffirms to conserve and extend wet reedbed habitats threatened by clogging bush encroachment and drying.

Abstract Image

雀形目鸟类在秋季除芦苇丛外对玉米作物的利用:人为湿地中的丰度、食性和食物可得性
由于城市化和农业等人类活动,湿地生境的生物多样性急剧减少和支离破碎。现在,鸟类作为生物多样性的指标,不得不在被复杂和高度改变的人类活动所包围的湿地中繁殖、越冬或停留。它们的活动可能集中在湿地残留物(湿芦苇丛)或次优栖息地(干芦苇丛)以及农田(玉米)等周围环境中。在位于法国西南部主要迁徙路线上的一片广阔湿地上,我们测试了不同栖息地的鸟类物种丰度是否因其专业化和生态学(湿芦苇滩与干芦苇滩;水生鸟类与普通鸟类;迁徙鸟类与本地鸟类)而有所不同,我们试图找出观察到的差异的内在机制,研究内容包括:各栖息地的节肢动物可用性、五种食虫鸟类的食物以及鸟类的补充能量。就鞘翅目、双翅目、鹤形目和蝉形目而言,玉米作物比芦苇丛容纳了更多的无脊椎动物和生物量。这也许可以解释为什么水生过路鸟类(蓝喉、秧鸡、芦苇莺)、迁徙鸟类或本地一般鸟类(罗宾、蓝山雀、大山雀、柳莺和夜莺)都喜欢吃农作物。蓝喉莺的食物更集中于甲虫,并利用这两种栖息地。尽管有玉米作为食物,但专门鸟类更喜欢芦苇丛:塞地莺主要以鹤虱科和蝉科为食;刺莺以蚜虫和鞘翅目为食。蚱莺更喜欢在干燥的芦苇丛中捕食蚜蝇。在潮湿的芦苇丛中,草莺和芦苇莺的数量较多。我们还注意到,最后一个物种的幼鸟在玉米作物中补充能量。因此,留鸟和迁徙鸟使用玉米作物的策略可能不同。一般的留鸟可能会分散寻找食物或在植被的连续性中寻找中转区;迁鸟则需要补充食物,尤其是水生迁鸟,它们比其他迁鸟更擅长芦苇丛。最后,玉米作物为大量物种提供了食物资源和合适的栖息地。它可能是干湿芦苇丛的补充生境,但不能替代。我们的研究再次证明,应保护和扩大受堵塞灌木侵占和干涸威胁的湿芦苇丛栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wetlands Ecology and Management
Wetlands Ecology and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wetlands Ecology and Management is an international journal that publishes authoritative and original articles on topics relevant to freshwater, brackish and marine coastal wetland ecosystems. The Journal serves as a multi-disciplinary forum covering key issues in wetlands science, management, policy and economics. As such, Wetlands Ecology and Management aims to encourage the exchange of information between environmental managers, pure and applied scientists, and national and international authorities on wetlands policy and ecological economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信