Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Coverage for R&D Firms

IF 2 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Risks Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.3390/risks12060098
Ashraf Khallaf, Feras M. Salama, Musa Darayseh, Eid Alotaibi
{"title":"Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Coverage for R&D Firms","authors":"Ashraf Khallaf, Feras M. Salama, Musa Darayseh, Eid Alotaibi","doi":"10.3390/risks12060098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research document a positive association between analyst coverage and R&D. However, they do not investigate what particular attribute of R&D leads to this positive association. In this study we aim to fill the gap in the extant literature and explore the cross-sectional determinants of the association between R&D and analyst coverage. We investigate four cross-sectional determinants: reporting biases arising from expensing of R&D compared to capitalization of R&D, uncertainty associated with R&D, investors’ attention, and scale effects of R&D. We find that while reporting biases and uncertainty decrease analyst coverage for R&D firms, investors’ attention and scale effects of R&D increase analyst coverage. Furthermore, we find that the positive association between R&D and analyst coverage documented by Barth et al. is fully explained by scale effects of R&D.","PeriodicalId":21282,"journal":{"name":"Risks","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12060098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research document a positive association between analyst coverage and R&D. However, they do not investigate what particular attribute of R&D leads to this positive association. In this study we aim to fill the gap in the extant literature and explore the cross-sectional determinants of the association between R&D and analyst coverage. We investigate four cross-sectional determinants: reporting biases arising from expensing of R&D compared to capitalization of R&D, uncertainty associated with R&D, investors’ attention, and scale effects of R&D. We find that while reporting biases and uncertainty decrease analyst coverage for R&D firms, investors’ attention and scale effects of R&D increase analyst coverage. Furthermore, we find that the positive association between R&D and analyst coverage documented by Barth et al. is fully explained by scale effects of R&D.
分析师对研发企业报道的横向决定因素
先前的研究表明,分析师覆盖率与研发之间存在正相关。然而,他们并没有研究研发的哪些特定属性会导致这种正相关关系。在本研究中,我们旨在填补现有文献的空白,探讨研发与分析师覆盖率之间关联的横截面决定因素。我们研究了四个横截面决定因素:研发费用化与研发资本化相比产生的报告偏差、与研发相关的不确定性、投资者的关注度以及研发的规模效应。我们发现,虽然报告偏差和不确定性会降低研发公司的分析师覆盖率,但投资者的关注度和研发的规模效应会提高分析师覆盖率。此外,我们还发现,Barth 等人记录的研发与分析师覆盖率之间的正相关关系完全可以用研发的规模效应来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risks
Risks Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.70%
发文量
205
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信