Alzheimer’s Disease Linkage to Real-World Evidence (AD-LINE) Study: Linking Claims Data to Phase 3 GRADUATE Study of Gantenerumab

IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS
H. Fillit, S. Seleri Assunção, Thomas Majda, C. D. Ng, T. M. To, I. M. Abbass, K. Raimundo, C. Wallick, O. V. Tcheremissine
{"title":"Alzheimer’s Disease Linkage to Real-World Evidence (AD-LINE) Study: Linking Claims Data to Phase 3 GRADUATE Study of Gantenerumab","authors":"H. Fillit, S. Seleri Assunção, Thomas Majda, C. D. Ng, T. M. To, I. M. Abbass, K. Raimundo, C. Wallick, O. V. Tcheremissine","doi":"10.14283/jpad.2024.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Linking data from clinical trials and real-world claims may improve the robustness of trial data and provide information on the health, economic, and societal impacts of a disease.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>To report on the feasibility of linking trial data to Medicare claims data in early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in the US.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design and Setting</h3><p>Alzheimer’s Disease Linkage to Real-World Evidence (AD-LINE) was a noninterventional cohort study that included participants recruited from the GRADUATE program whose trial data were linked to their Medicare claims.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Participants</h3><p>AD-LINE participants were 66 years and older with early symptomatic AD (ie, mild cognitive impairment [MCI] due to AD or mild AD dementia) and were enrolled in the GRADUATE program and a Medicare fee-for-service or Medicare Advantage plan.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Measurements</h3><p>The Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services linked participants’ clinical trial identifiers to their Medicare beneficiary identifiers using a deterministic, exact matching process. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the AD-LINE cohort at baseline were collected. Outcomes measured in this study included healthcare resource utilization derived from Medicare claims data.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In total, 147 participants across 21 US sites were invited to participate and 111 provided informed consent. Of those, 61 patients had linkable data (ie, Medicare beneficiary identifier), Medicare Parts A/B enrollment, and no health maintenance organization (HMO) enrollment in the year before trial entry. Of the 61 participants whose data were analyzed in this study, 30 had MCI due to AD and 31 had mild AD dementia. Participants in the MCI due to AD group had more healthcare resource utilization on average in the baseline period than those in the mild AD dementia group (29.9 [SD, 20.9] vs 24.5 claims [SD, 12.3]). In an ad hoc analysis, a relatively high concordance (85.3%) was seen between the rates of clinically confirmed AD diagnosis and evidence of AD diagnosis in claims data.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This linkage process may serve as a proof of concept for researchers interested in linking clinical trial and real-world claims data. The lessons learned from AD-LINE and innovation of data linkage approaches may encourage key stakeholders to link data in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Linking data from clinical trials and real-world claims may improve the robustness of trial data and provide information on the health, economic, and societal impacts of a disease.

Objective

To report on the feasibility of linking trial data to Medicare claims data in early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in the US.

Design and Setting

Alzheimer’s Disease Linkage to Real-World Evidence (AD-LINE) was a noninterventional cohort study that included participants recruited from the GRADUATE program whose trial data were linked to their Medicare claims.

Participants

AD-LINE participants were 66 years and older with early symptomatic AD (ie, mild cognitive impairment [MCI] due to AD or mild AD dementia) and were enrolled in the GRADUATE program and a Medicare fee-for-service or Medicare Advantage plan.

Measurements

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services linked participants’ clinical trial identifiers to their Medicare beneficiary identifiers using a deterministic, exact matching process. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the AD-LINE cohort at baseline were collected. Outcomes measured in this study included healthcare resource utilization derived from Medicare claims data.

Results

In total, 147 participants across 21 US sites were invited to participate and 111 provided informed consent. Of those, 61 patients had linkable data (ie, Medicare beneficiary identifier), Medicare Parts A/B enrollment, and no health maintenance organization (HMO) enrollment in the year before trial entry. Of the 61 participants whose data were analyzed in this study, 30 had MCI due to AD and 31 had mild AD dementia. Participants in the MCI due to AD group had more healthcare resource utilization on average in the baseline period than those in the mild AD dementia group (29.9 [SD, 20.9] vs 24.5 claims [SD, 12.3]). In an ad hoc analysis, a relatively high concordance (85.3%) was seen between the rates of clinically confirmed AD diagnosis and evidence of AD diagnosis in claims data.

Conclusion

This linkage process may serve as a proof of concept for researchers interested in linking clinical trial and real-world claims data. The lessons learned from AD-LINE and innovation of data linkage approaches may encourage key stakeholders to link data in the future.

Abstract Image

阿尔茨海默病与现实世界证据关联研究(AD-LINE):将索赔数据与甘特宁单抗 GRADUATE 3 期研究联系起来
背景将临床试验数据与现实世界的理赔数据联系起来可以提高试验数据的稳健性,并提供有关疾病对健康、经济和社会影响的信息。目的报告将美国早期症状性阿尔茨海默病(AD)的试验数据与医疗保险理赔数据联系起来的可行性。设计与设置阿尔茨海默病与现实世界证据关联研究(AD-LINE)是一项非介入性队列研究,研究对象包括从GRADUATE项目中招募的参与者,其试验数据已与他们的医疗保险理赔数据关联。AD-LINE的参与者年龄在66岁及以上,患有早期症状性AD(即由AD或轻度AD痴呆引起的轻度认知障碍[MCI]),并参加了GRADUATE项目和医疗保险付费服务或医疗保险优势计划。收集了AD-LINE队列基线时的人口统计学特征和临床特征。本研究测量的结果包括从医疗保险理赔数据中得出的医疗资源利用情况。结果美国 21 个研究机构共邀请了 147 名参与者参与研究,其中 111 人提供了知情同意书。其中,61 名患者拥有可链接数据(即联邦医疗保险受益人标识符)、联邦医疗保险 A/B 部分参保记录,且在加入试验前一年未加入健康维护组织 (HMO)。本研究分析了 61 名参与者的数据,其中 30 人患有注意力缺失导致的 MCI,31 人患有轻度注意力缺失导致的痴呆。与轻度 AD 痴呆症组相比,因 AD 引起的 MCI 组的参与者在基线期平均使用了更多的医疗资源(29.9 [SD, 20.9] vs 24.5 claims [SD, 12.3])。在一项特别分析中,临床确诊的 AD 诊断率与索赔数据中 AD 诊断证据之间的一致性相对较高(85.3%)。从 AD-LINE 中吸取的经验教训和数据关联方法的创新可能会鼓励主要利益相关者在未来进行数据关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信