Theorizing a denial reaction to coming out: Revising Goffman's stigma through a sexual identity process model

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Sonali Patel
{"title":"Theorizing a denial reaction to coming out: Revising Goffman's stigma through a sexual identity process model","authors":"Sonali Patel","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Erving Goffman's seminal theorization of stigma is at the heart of social scientific conceptualizations of identity management. Using data from qualitative interviews with queer South Asian women in Canada, this article proposes revisions of Goffman's <jats:italic>Stigma theory</jats:italic>. Intervening his supposition of acceptance and hostility as the two possible reactions to stigma revelation, I establish denial as an additional reaction to identity disclosure. A denial reaction has four key characteristics: (1) resistance to queer sexuality, (2) prescriptive enforcement of heterosexuality, (3) refusal to accept lesbian relationships, and (4) avoidance of conversation about queerness. I argue that disclosure to parents does not always translate to outness; rather, it can force the individual back into the closet. I refer to this non‐linear process as the culturally expansive closet. The article presents a sexual identity management process model that accounts for these culturally collectivist experiences. The results are significant for rethinking and affirming non‐Western ways of managing stigmatized identities.","PeriodicalId":47997,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Compass","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Erving Goffman's seminal theorization of stigma is at the heart of social scientific conceptualizations of identity management. Using data from qualitative interviews with queer South Asian women in Canada, this article proposes revisions of Goffman's Stigma theory. Intervening his supposition of acceptance and hostility as the two possible reactions to stigma revelation, I establish denial as an additional reaction to identity disclosure. A denial reaction has four key characteristics: (1) resistance to queer sexuality, (2) prescriptive enforcement of heterosexuality, (3) refusal to accept lesbian relationships, and (4) avoidance of conversation about queerness. I argue that disclosure to parents does not always translate to outness; rather, it can force the individual back into the closet. I refer to this non‐linear process as the culturally expansive closet. The article presents a sexual identity management process model that accounts for these culturally collectivist experiences. The results are significant for rethinking and affirming non‐Western ways of managing stigmatized identities.
出柜后的否认反应理论化:通过性身份认同过程模型修正戈夫曼的耻辱论
欧文-戈夫曼(Erving Goffman)关于成见的开创性理论是社会科学身份管理概念的核心。本文利用对加拿大南亚同性恋妇女的定性访谈数据,提出了对戈夫曼成见理论的修正。戈夫曼认为接受和敌视是对成见揭示的两种可能反应,我在此基础上将否认作为身份揭示的另一种反应。否认反应有四个主要特征:(1) 抵制同性恋,(2) 规定性地执行异性恋,(3) 拒绝接受女同性恋关系,(4) 避免谈论同性恋。我认为,向父母公开并不总是意味着出柜,相反,它可能会迫使个人回到柜子里。我将这一非线性过程称为文化扩张壁橱。文章提出了一个性身份管理过程模型,解释了这些文化上的集体主义经历。研究结果对于重新思考和肯定非西方的污名化身份管理方式具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociology Compass
Sociology Compass SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
102
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信