Exploring the dynamics of design thinking in management education and training: a critical review, taxonomic analysis and practical implications

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Arushi Bathla, Ginni Chawla, Mahrane Hofaidhllaoui, Marina Dabic
{"title":"Exploring the dynamics of design thinking in management education and training: a critical review, taxonomic analysis and practical implications","authors":"Arushi Bathla, Ginni Chawla, Mahrane Hofaidhllaoui, Marina Dabic","doi":"10.1108/ejim-12-2023-1108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Applying critical analysis as the methodological framework for assessing the literature, the review seeks to present a summary and evaluation of the existing body of knowledge. This approach helps to establish the basis for developing forthcoming recommendations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The articles were selected through a Systematic Literature Review following the PRISMA guidelines, and utilising Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and the Education Resources Information Center database. Field taxonomy is presented based on the outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Through a critical review, we offer narrative arguments that document the shortcomings in the existing literature by scrutinising study designs and highlighting suboptimal approaches. Finally, we issue a call to action for future research, envisioning its potential to reorient and reconstruct the field while enhancing the quality of future studies. This proactive stance aims to foster the development of more competent and insightful perspectives, theories, and policy recommendations within design thinking in management education and training.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The research in this field holds significant potential for providing valuable practical and policy insights, contingent upon the rigorous and thorough execution of studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This article presents a robust critical review of 57 state-of-the-art articles investigating design thinking in the context of management education and training.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51462,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Innovation Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2023-1108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Applying critical analysis as the methodological framework for assessing the literature, the review seeks to present a summary and evaluation of the existing body of knowledge. This approach helps to establish the basis for developing forthcoming recommendations.

Design/methodology/approach

The articles were selected through a Systematic Literature Review following the PRISMA guidelines, and utilising Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and the Education Resources Information Center database. Field taxonomy is presented based on the outcomes.

Findings

Through a critical review, we offer narrative arguments that document the shortcomings in the existing literature by scrutinising study designs and highlighting suboptimal approaches. Finally, we issue a call to action for future research, envisioning its potential to reorient and reconstruct the field while enhancing the quality of future studies. This proactive stance aims to foster the development of more competent and insightful perspectives, theories, and policy recommendations within design thinking in management education and training.

Practical implications

The research in this field holds significant potential for providing valuable practical and policy insights, contingent upon the rigorous and thorough execution of studies.

Originality/value

This article presents a robust critical review of 57 state-of-the-art articles investigating design thinking in the context of management education and training.

探索管理教育和培训中的设计思维动态:批判性评论、分类分析和实际意义
目的本综述以批判性分析作为评估文献的方法框架,旨在对现有知识体系进行总结和评估。设计/方法/途径按照 PRISMA 准则,并利用 Scopus、Web of Science、Science Direct 和教育资源信息中心数据库,通过系统文献综述筛选文章。通过批判性综述,我们提供了叙述性论据,通过对研究设计的审查和对次优方法的强调,记录了现有文献的不足之处。最后,我们对未来的研究发出了行动呼吁,设想其在提高未来研究质量的同时,有可能重新定位和重建该领域。这种积极主动的立场旨在促进管理教育与培训中的设计思维发展出更有能力、更有洞察力的观点、理论和政策建议。原创性/价值本文对57篇研究管理教育与培训中的设计思维的最新文章进行了有力的批判性评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The subject of innovation is receiving increased interest both from companies because of their increased awareness of the impact of innovation in determining market success and also from the research community. Academics are increasingly beginning to place innovation as a priority area in their research agenda. This impetus has been partly fuelled by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) who have designated innovation as one of nine research areas in their research initiative schemes.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信