Monitoring tropical freshwater fish with underwater videography and deep learning

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 FISHERIES
Andrew Jansen, Steve van Bodegraven, Andrew Esparon, Varma Gadhiraju, Samantha Walker, Constanza Buccella, Kris Bock, David Loewensteiner, Thomas J. Mooney, Andrew J. Harford, Renee E. Bartolo, Chris L. Humphrey
{"title":"Monitoring tropical freshwater fish with underwater videography and deep learning","authors":"Andrew Jansen, Steve van Bodegraven, Andrew Esparon, Varma Gadhiraju, Samantha Walker, Constanza Buccella, Kris Bock, David Loewensteiner, Thomas J. Mooney, Andrew J. Harford, Renee E. Bartolo, Chris L. Humphrey","doi":"10.1071/mf23166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>The application of deep learning to monitor tropical freshwater fish assemblages and detect potential anthropogenic impacts is poorly understood.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>This study aimed to compare the results between trained human observers and deep learning, using the fish monitoring program for impact detection at Ranger Uranium Mine as a case study.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Fish abundance (MaxN) was measured by trained observers and deep learning. Microsoft’s <i>Azure Custom Vision</i> was used to annotate, label and train deep learning models with fish imagery. PERMANOVA was used to compare method, year and billabong.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Deep learning model training on 23 fish taxa resulted in mean average precision, precision and recall of 83.6, 81.3 and 89.1%, respectively. PERMANOVA revealed significant differences between the two methods, but no significant interaction was observed in method, billabong and year.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>These results suggest that the distribution of fish taxa and their relative abundances determined by deep learning and trained observers reflect similar changes between control and exposed billabongs over a 3-year period.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>The implications of these method-related differences should be carefully considered in the context of impact detection, and further research is required to more accurately characterise small-growing schooling fish species, which were found to contribute significantly to the observed differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":18209,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Freshwater Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Freshwater Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/mf23166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The application of deep learning to monitor tropical freshwater fish assemblages and detect potential anthropogenic impacts is poorly understood.

Aims

This study aimed to compare the results between trained human observers and deep learning, using the fish monitoring program for impact detection at Ranger Uranium Mine as a case study.

Methods

Fish abundance (MaxN) was measured by trained observers and deep learning. Microsoft’s Azure Custom Vision was used to annotate, label and train deep learning models with fish imagery. PERMANOVA was used to compare method, year and billabong.

Key results

Deep learning model training on 23 fish taxa resulted in mean average precision, precision and recall of 83.6, 81.3 and 89.1%, respectively. PERMANOVA revealed significant differences between the two methods, but no significant interaction was observed in method, billabong and year.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the distribution of fish taxa and their relative abundances determined by deep learning and trained observers reflect similar changes between control and exposed billabongs over a 3-year period.

Implications

The implications of these method-related differences should be carefully considered in the context of impact detection, and further research is required to more accurately characterise small-growing schooling fish species, which were found to contribute significantly to the observed differences.

利用水下摄像和深度学习监控热带淡水鱼类
背景人们对深度学习在监测热带淡水鱼群和探测潜在人为影响方面的应用知之甚少。目的本研究旨在比较训练有素的人类观察员和深度学习的结果,并以兰杰铀矿的鱼类监测计划为案例进行影响检测。方法通过训练有素的观察员和深度学习测量鱼类丰度(MaxN)。使用微软的 Azure Custom Vision 对鱼类图像进行注释、标记和训练深度学习模型。使用 PERMANOVA 对方法、年份和水域进行比较。主要结果对 23 个鱼类分类群进行深度学习模型训练后,平均精度、准确率和召回率分别为 83.6%、81.3% 和 89.1%。PERMANOVA 显示两种方法之间存在显著差异,但在方法、billabong 和年份之间没有观察到显著的交互作用。结论这些结果表明,由深度学习和训练有素的观察者确定的鱼类分类群分布及其相对丰度反映了对照组和暴露的水槽在 3 年内发生的类似变化。启示在影响检测中应仔细考虑这些与方法有关的差异的影响,并需要进一步研究,以更准确地描述小生长的学校鱼类物种,因为发现这些物种对观察到的差异有很大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine and Freshwater Research
Marine and Freshwater Research 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
76
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Marine and Freshwater Research is an international and interdisciplinary journal publishing contributions on all aquatic environments. The journal’s content addresses broad conceptual questions and investigations about the ecology and management of aquatic environments. Environments range from groundwaters, wetlands and streams to estuaries, rocky shores, reefs and the open ocean. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: aquatic ecosystem processes, such as nutrient cycling; biology; ecology; biogeochemistry; biogeography and phylogeography; hydrology; limnology; oceanography; toxicology; conservation and management; and ecosystem services. Contributions that are interdisciplinary and of wide interest and consider the social-ecological and institutional issues associated with managing marine and freshwater ecosystems are welcomed. Marine and Freshwater Research is a valuable resource for researchers in industry and academia, resource managers, environmental consultants, students and amateurs who are interested in any aspect of the aquatic sciences. Marine and Freshwater Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信