Post-Conflict Behaviors of Wild Gelada Monkeys (Theropithecus gelada) at Guassa, Ethiopia

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Triana I. Hohn, Bing Lin, Carrie M. Miller, Iris R. Foxfoot, Vivek V. Venkataraman, Kathreen E. Ruckstuhl, Nga Nguyen, Peter J. Fashing
{"title":"Post-Conflict Behaviors of Wild Gelada Monkeys (Theropithecus gelada) at Guassa, Ethiopia","authors":"Triana I. Hohn, Bing Lin, Carrie M. Miller, Iris R. Foxfoot, Vivek V. Venkataraman, Kathreen E. Ruckstuhl, Nga Nguyen, Peter J. Fashing","doi":"10.1007/s10764-024-00438-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Post-conflict behaviors are a crucial component of primate sociality, yet are difficult to study in the wild. We evaluated the presence and timing of reconciliation, victim-solicited and unsolicited third-party affiliation, and secondary and redirected aggression following observed agonistic interactions among 38 wild gelada monkeys (<i>Theropithecus gelada</i>) in eight one-male, multi-female units at Guassa, Ethiopia, from April to August 2018. We also report background rates of aggression and patterns of agonistic interactions and post-conflict behaviours among wild geladas relative to possible mediating factors for each conflict, including social rank disparity, kinship type, sex, age class, conflict intensity, and conflict decidedness. Across 55 post-conflict and 55 subsequent matched-control focal follows, we found no evidence for post-conflict reconciliation, third-party affiliation, secondary aggression, or redirected aggression. These findings contrast with previous studies of captive geladas, which find that individuals often reconcile after fights and frequently exhibit unsolicited third-party affiliation when reconciliation does not occur. Our results from wild geladas point to possible populational differences in behavioral tendencies arising from variable space, time, social grouping, and/or food availability constraints. Our findings also reveal potential limitations in applying identical data collection protocols across environmental contexts and underscore the importance of creating generalizable cross-context metrics to better understand, and contextualize, the diversity of post-conflict behavioral mechanisms underpinning primate sociality in geladas and other group-living primates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14264,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Primatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-024-00438-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-conflict behaviors are a crucial component of primate sociality, yet are difficult to study in the wild. We evaluated the presence and timing of reconciliation, victim-solicited and unsolicited third-party affiliation, and secondary and redirected aggression following observed agonistic interactions among 38 wild gelada monkeys (Theropithecus gelada) in eight one-male, multi-female units at Guassa, Ethiopia, from April to August 2018. We also report background rates of aggression and patterns of agonistic interactions and post-conflict behaviours among wild geladas relative to possible mediating factors for each conflict, including social rank disparity, kinship type, sex, age class, conflict intensity, and conflict decidedness. Across 55 post-conflict and 55 subsequent matched-control focal follows, we found no evidence for post-conflict reconciliation, third-party affiliation, secondary aggression, or redirected aggression. These findings contrast with previous studies of captive geladas, which find that individuals often reconcile after fights and frequently exhibit unsolicited third-party affiliation when reconciliation does not occur. Our results from wild geladas point to possible populational differences in behavioral tendencies arising from variable space, time, social grouping, and/or food availability constraints. Our findings also reveal potential limitations in applying identical data collection protocols across environmental contexts and underscore the importance of creating generalizable cross-context metrics to better understand, and contextualize, the diversity of post-conflict behavioral mechanisms underpinning primate sociality in geladas and other group-living primates.

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚瓜萨野生格拉达猴(Theropithecus gelada)的冲突后行为
冲突后行为是灵长类动物社会性的重要组成部分,但却很难在野外进行研究。我们评估了2018年4月至8月在埃塞俄比亚瓜萨(Guassa)8个一雄多雌单位中观察到的38只野生狮尾猴(Theropithecus gelada)的激动互动后和解、受害者主动提出和主动提出的第三方从属关系以及二次和重定向攻击的存在和时间。我们还报告了野生狮尾狒的攻击背景率、激动互动模式和冲突后行为,以及与每次冲突的可能中介因素相关的情况,包括社会等级差异、亲属类型、性别、年龄等级、冲突强度和冲突决定性。在 55 个冲突后焦点和 55 个随后的匹配对照焦点中,我们没有发现冲突后和解、第三方从属关系、二次攻击或重新定向攻击的证据。这些研究结果与之前对圈养黄尾狒狒的研究结果形成了鲜明对比,后者发现黄尾狒狒经常在打斗后进行和解,并且在没有和解的情况下经常表现出主动的第三方隶属关系。我们对野生黄颡鱼的研究结果表明,由于空间、时间、社会分组和/或食物供应的限制,黄颡鱼的行为倾向可能存在种群差异。我们的研究结果还揭示了在不同环境下应用相同的数据收集方案可能存在的局限性,并强调了建立可通用的跨环境度量标准的重要性,以便更好地了解和理解冲突后行为机制的多样性,这些机制是明胶和其他群居灵长类动物社会性的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Primatology is a multidisciplinary forum devoted to the dissemination of current research in fundamental primatology. Publishing peer-reviewed, high-quality original articles which feature primates, the journal gathers laboratory and field studies from such diverse disciplines as anthropology, anatomy, ecology, ethology, paleontology, psychology, sociology, and zoology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信