Dynamic incentive mechanisms in mega project-risk management considering the participation of the insurance company

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Qianqian Shi, Longyu Yao, Changwei Bi, Jianbo Zhu
{"title":"Dynamic incentive mechanisms in mega project-risk management considering the participation of the insurance company","authors":"Qianqian Shi, Longyu Yao, Changwei Bi, Jianbo Zhu","doi":"10.1108/ecam-04-2024-0473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The construction of megaprojects often involves substantial risks. While insurance plays an important role as a traditional risk transfer means, owners and insurance companies may still suffer huge losses during the risk management process. Therefore, considering the strong motivation of insurance companies to participate in the on-site risk management of megaprojects, this study aims to propose a collaborative incentive mechanism involving insurance companies, to optimize the risk management effect and reduce the risk of accidents in megaprojects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Based on principal-agent theory, the research develops the static and dynamic incentive models for risk management in megaprojects, involving both the owner and insurance company. The study examines the primary factors influencing incentive efficiency. The results are numerically simulated with a validation case. Finally, the impact of parameter changes on the stakeholders' benefits is analyzed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results indicate that the dynamic incentive model is available to the achievement of a flexible mechanism to ensure the benefits of contractors while protecting the benefits of the owner and insurance company. Adjusting the incentive coefficients for owners and insurance companies within a specified range promotes the growth of benefits for all parties involved. The management cost and economic benefit allocation coefficients have a positive effect on the adjustment range of the incentive coefficient, which helps implement a more flexible dynamic incentive mechanism to motivate contractors to carry out risk management to reduce risk losses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study makes up for the absence of important stakeholders in risk management. Different from traditional megaproject risk management, this model uses insurance companies as bridges to break the island effect of risk management among multiple megaprojects. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by designing appropriate dynamic incentive mechanisms in megaproject risk management through insurance company participation, and provides practical implications to both owner and insurance company on incentive contract making, thus achieving better risk governance of megaprojects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":11888,"journal":{"name":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-04-2024-0473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The construction of megaprojects often involves substantial risks. While insurance plays an important role as a traditional risk transfer means, owners and insurance companies may still suffer huge losses during the risk management process. Therefore, considering the strong motivation of insurance companies to participate in the on-site risk management of megaprojects, this study aims to propose a collaborative incentive mechanism involving insurance companies, to optimize the risk management effect and reduce the risk of accidents in megaprojects.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on principal-agent theory, the research develops the static and dynamic incentive models for risk management in megaprojects, involving both the owner and insurance company. The study examines the primary factors influencing incentive efficiency. The results are numerically simulated with a validation case. Finally, the impact of parameter changes on the stakeholders' benefits is analyzed.

Findings

The results indicate that the dynamic incentive model is available to the achievement of a flexible mechanism to ensure the benefits of contractors while protecting the benefits of the owner and insurance company. Adjusting the incentive coefficients for owners and insurance companies within a specified range promotes the growth of benefits for all parties involved. The management cost and economic benefit allocation coefficients have a positive effect on the adjustment range of the incentive coefficient, which helps implement a more flexible dynamic incentive mechanism to motivate contractors to carry out risk management to reduce risk losses.

Originality/value

This study makes up for the absence of important stakeholders in risk management. Different from traditional megaproject risk management, this model uses insurance companies as bridges to break the island effect of risk management among multiple megaprojects. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by designing appropriate dynamic incentive mechanisms in megaproject risk management through insurance company participation, and provides practical implications to both owner and insurance company on incentive contract making, thus achieving better risk governance of megaprojects.

考虑保险公司参与的超大型项目风险管理的动态激励机制
目的 特大项目的建设往往涉及巨大风险。虽然保险作为传统的风险转移手段发挥着重要作用,但在风险管理过程中,业主和保险公司仍可能遭受巨大损失。因此,考虑到保险公司参与特大型项目现场风险管理的强烈动机,本研究旨在提出一种有保险公司参与的协同激励机制,以优化特大型项目的风险管理效果,降低事故风险。设计/方法/途径基于委托代理理论,本研究建立了特大型项目风险管理的静态和动态激励模型,涉及业主和保险公司双方。研究探讨了影响激励效率的主要因素。研究结果通过一个验证案例进行了数值模拟。研究结果表明,动态激励模型可以实现灵活的机制,在确保承包商利益的同时,保护业主和保险公司的利益。在一定范围内调整业主和保险公司的激励系数,可以促进各方利益的增长。管理成本和经济利益分配系数对激励系数的调整范围有正向影响,有助于实施更加灵活的动态激励机制,激励承包商开展风险管理,减少风险损失。与传统的特大型项目风险管理不同,该模型以保险公司为桥梁,打破了多个特大型项目之间风险管理的孤岛效应。本研究通过保险公司的参与,在特大型项目风险管理中设计适当的动态激励机制,为业主和保险公司在激励合同制定方面提供了实践意义,从而更好地实现特大型项目的风险治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management Business, Management and Accounting-General Business,Management and Accounting
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
19.50%
发文量
226
期刊介绍: ECAM publishes original peer-reviewed research papers, case studies, technical notes, book reviews, features, discussions and other contemporary articles that advance research and practice in engineering, construction and architectural management. In particular, ECAM seeks to advance integrated design and construction practices, project lifecycle management, and sustainable construction. The journal’s scope covers all aspects of architectural design, design management, construction/project management, engineering management of major infrastructure projects, and the operation and management of constructed facilities. ECAM also addresses the technological, process, economic/business, environmental/sustainability, political, and social/human developments that influence the construction project delivery process. ECAM strives to establish strong theoretical and empirical debates in the above areas of engineering, architecture, and construction research. Papers should be heavily integrated with the existing and current body of knowledge within the field and develop explicit and novel contributions. Acknowledging the global character of the field, we welcome papers on regional studies but encourage authors to position the work within the broader international context by reviewing and comparing findings from their regional study with studies conducted in other regions or countries whenever possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信