Comparative shear performance of ultra high‐performance concrete filled pocket and longitudinal trough connector of PC composite girder with full‐depth deck
Aimin Yuan, Xinge Miao, Qi Chen, Xi Wang, Hu Kong, Keqin Wang, Jingquan Wang
{"title":"Comparative shear performance of ultra high‐performance concrete filled pocket and longitudinal trough connector of PC composite girder with full‐depth deck","authors":"Aimin Yuan, Xinge Miao, Qi Chen, Xi Wang, Hu Kong, Keqin Wang, Jingquan Wang","doi":"10.1002/suco.202400410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prestress concrete composite girders with full‐depth precast bridge deck panels (PC composite girders) have been widely utilized in civil engineering due to their high production quality, reduced construction duration, potential weight reduction, and lower life‐cycle cost. The interface shear behavior in ultra high‐performance concrete (UHPC)–normal concrete (NC) connection interface of full‐depth deck PC composite girder has been extensively studied. This study conducted seven push‐off tests to examine the shear performance of UHPC‐filled joints between precast I‐girders and full‐depth precast concrete slabs. The testing variables included the quantity, and spacing of the Ubars, as well as the type of UHPC‐filled joints (longitudinal trough connector or pocket connector). The experimental results show the quantity and spacing of Ubars have a significant impact on both the interface shear capacity and residual shear resistance. For continuous shear connectors with reserved notches specimens, the ultimate load of the 4Ubar and 6Ubar specimens increased by 93% and 194%, respectively, compared with the 2Ubar specimens. With the increase of the spacing of the Ubar, the ultimate load will decrease. When the spacing between Ubars increases from 100 to 150 mm, the normalized ultimate load decreases by 51 kN. The type of joints also plays a crucial role in determining the ultimate shear‐bearing capacity of the specimens. The Ubars in pocket connector specimens will provide a greater contribution to the ultimate shear bearing capacity than longitudinal trough connector specimens and the ultimate stress of the 4Ubar and 6Ubar pocket connector specimens are greater than that of the longitudinal trough connector specimens by 232% and 323%. The study introduces the concept of pulling angle. In the experiment, the specimen with a large length is less affected by the pulling force. The experimental results in this study can rarely be predicted well by typical equations developed in current design codes and previous studies. Therefore, a more accurate equation was developed to predict the interface shear transfer stress between precast common concrete I‐girder and full‐depth precast concrete slab with UHPC‐filled joints.","PeriodicalId":21988,"journal":{"name":"Structural Concrete","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prestress concrete composite girders with full‐depth precast bridge deck panels (PC composite girders) have been widely utilized in civil engineering due to their high production quality, reduced construction duration, potential weight reduction, and lower life‐cycle cost. The interface shear behavior in ultra high‐performance concrete (UHPC)–normal concrete (NC) connection interface of full‐depth deck PC composite girder has been extensively studied. This study conducted seven push‐off tests to examine the shear performance of UHPC‐filled joints between precast I‐girders and full‐depth precast concrete slabs. The testing variables included the quantity, and spacing of the Ubars, as well as the type of UHPC‐filled joints (longitudinal trough connector or pocket connector). The experimental results show the quantity and spacing of Ubars have a significant impact on both the interface shear capacity and residual shear resistance. For continuous shear connectors with reserved notches specimens, the ultimate load of the 4Ubar and 6Ubar specimens increased by 93% and 194%, respectively, compared with the 2Ubar specimens. With the increase of the spacing of the Ubar, the ultimate load will decrease. When the spacing between Ubars increases from 100 to 150 mm, the normalized ultimate load decreases by 51 kN. The type of joints also plays a crucial role in determining the ultimate shear‐bearing capacity of the specimens. The Ubars in pocket connector specimens will provide a greater contribution to the ultimate shear bearing capacity than longitudinal trough connector specimens and the ultimate stress of the 4Ubar and 6Ubar pocket connector specimens are greater than that of the longitudinal trough connector specimens by 232% and 323%. The study introduces the concept of pulling angle. In the experiment, the specimen with a large length is less affected by the pulling force. The experimental results in this study can rarely be predicted well by typical equations developed in current design codes and previous studies. Therefore, a more accurate equation was developed to predict the interface shear transfer stress between precast common concrete I‐girder and full‐depth precast concrete slab with UHPC‐filled joints.
期刊介绍:
Structural Concrete, the official journal of the fib, provides conceptual and procedural guidance in the field of concrete construction, and features peer-reviewed papers, keynote research and industry news covering all aspects of the design, construction, performance in service and demolition of concrete structures.
Main topics:
design, construction, performance in service, conservation (assessment, maintenance, strengthening) and demolition of concrete structures
research about the behaviour of concrete structures
development of design methods
fib Model Code
sustainability of concrete structures.