Epilepsy Socioeconomic Impact in a Tertiary Center in Brazil From the Patient Perspective

Tayla Taynan Romão, Everton Nunes da Silva, Monica Kayo, Raíssa Mansilla, Lucas Ferraz, Isabella D’Andrea
{"title":"Epilepsy Socioeconomic Impact in a Tertiary Center in Brazil From the Patient Perspective","authors":"Tayla Taynan Romão, Everton Nunes da Silva, Monica Kayo, Raíssa Mansilla, Lucas Ferraz, Isabella D’Andrea","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.02.24309857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to evaluate the direct and indirect annual costs of epilepsy from the perspective of patients with epilepsy treated at a public tertiary center situated in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.\nMethods: A cross-sectional cost-of-illness study was conducted, using a bottom-up approach based on interviews and records of 166 outpatients with confirmed diagnoses of epilepsy. Direct costs included expenses related to treatment, and transportation, while indirect costs encompassed productivity losses due to morbidity and mortality, assessed through the human capital approach and caregivers.\nResults: The majority of patients in the sample had refractory epilepsy (68.1%) and were on polytherapy (43.98%). The average per capita income of the sample was USD 434,90 per month, and 28.3% of the individuals were unemployed. The total costs amounted to USD 8,243.10 per patient per year, with 76.95% attributed to indirect costs, 23.05% to direct medical costs, and 2.31% to non-medical costs. The primary cost contributors included unemployment (30.42%), caregiver expenses (22.41%), and antiseizure medications (20.30%). The majority of patients reported purchasing all their medications (62.43%). The total out-of-pocket health expenses amounted to USD 2,090.10 per patient per year, with medications accounting for 90.89% of the expenses and transportation for 9.11%.\nConclusions: In addition to unemployment as the main cost driver, the patients incurred catastrophic spending on medications. Even though treated in a public service, out-of-pocket health expenses made up 40.04% of the average per capita income of the sample and 12.85% of the Brazilian GDP per capita in 2021. The significant patient expenditures may contribute to poor adherence to epilepsy treatment, which can exacerbate the disease and lead to increased seizure frequency. This, in turn, reduces their ability to earn income, contributing to the rise in indirect and intangible costs.","PeriodicalId":501072,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.02.24309857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the direct and indirect annual costs of epilepsy from the perspective of patients with epilepsy treated at a public tertiary center situated in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Methods: A cross-sectional cost-of-illness study was conducted, using a bottom-up approach based on interviews and records of 166 outpatients with confirmed diagnoses of epilepsy. Direct costs included expenses related to treatment, and transportation, while indirect costs encompassed productivity losses due to morbidity and mortality, assessed through the human capital approach and caregivers. Results: The majority of patients in the sample had refractory epilepsy (68.1%) and were on polytherapy (43.98%). The average per capita income of the sample was USD 434,90 per month, and 28.3% of the individuals were unemployed. The total costs amounted to USD 8,243.10 per patient per year, with 76.95% attributed to indirect costs, 23.05% to direct medical costs, and 2.31% to non-medical costs. The primary cost contributors included unemployment (30.42%), caregiver expenses (22.41%), and antiseizure medications (20.30%). The majority of patients reported purchasing all their medications (62.43%). The total out-of-pocket health expenses amounted to USD 2,090.10 per patient per year, with medications accounting for 90.89% of the expenses and transportation for 9.11%. Conclusions: In addition to unemployment as the main cost driver, the patients incurred catastrophic spending on medications. Even though treated in a public service, out-of-pocket health expenses made up 40.04% of the average per capita income of the sample and 12.85% of the Brazilian GDP per capita in 2021. The significant patient expenditures may contribute to poor adherence to epilepsy treatment, which can exacerbate the disease and lead to increased seizure frequency. This, in turn, reduces their ability to earn income, contributing to the rise in indirect and intangible costs.
从患者角度看癫痫对巴西一家三级医疗中心的社会经济影响
研究背景本研究旨在从在巴西里约热内卢一家公立三级中心接受治疗的癫痫患者的角度,评估癫痫的直接和间接年度成本:方法:采用自下而上的方法,对 166 名确诊为癫痫的门诊患者进行了访谈并记录在案,从而开展了一项疾病成本横断面研究。直接成本包括与治疗和交通相关的费用,而间接成本包括因发病率和死亡率造成的生产力损失,通过人力资本方法和护理人员进行评估:样本中的大多数患者患有难治性癫痫(68.1%),正在接受多种治疗(43.98%)。样本的人均月收入为 434.90 美元,28.3% 的人失业。每位患者每年的总费用为 8,243.10 美元,其中 76.95% 为间接费用,23.05% 为直接医疗费用,2.31% 为非医疗费用。主要费用来源包括失业(30.42%)、护理人员费用(22.41%)和抗癫痫药物(20.30%)。大多数患者表示自己购买了所有药物(62.43%)。每位患者每年自付的医疗费用总额为 2,090.10 美元,其中药物费用占 90.89%,交通费用占 9.11%:结论:除了失业是主要的费用驱动因素外,患者在药物方面的支出也是灾难性的。尽管是在公共服务机构接受治疗,但自付医疗费用占样本人均收入的 40.04%,占 2021 年巴西人均 GDP 的 12.85%。患者的巨额支出可能会导致癫痫治疗的依从性差,从而加重病情并导致癫痫发作频率增加。这反过来又会降低他们的创收能力,导致间接和无形成本上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信