Analyzing the Potential of the Southern Corridor in Competition with China-Europe Freight Transport Corridors Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mohammad Jamshidian Tehrani, Reza Golshan Khavas
{"title":"Analyzing the Potential of the Southern Corridor in Competition with China-Europe Freight Transport Corridors Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making","authors":"Mohammad Jamshidian Tehrani, Reza Golshan Khavas","doi":"10.1007/s40999-024-01011-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Southern Corridor within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), traversing Iran, signifies a potential link between China and Europe. Although not yet operational, it’s poised for competition with its well-established counterparts: the Trans-Siberian, Middle, and Traditional Maritime Corridors. This study evaluates the competitiveness of the Southern Corridor compared to these rivals, with a noteworthy focus on the Southern and Middle Corridors, which have not previously undergone quantitative evaluation alongside the Trans-Siberian and Traditional Maritime Corridors. The methodology is grounded in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). The study initiates by identifying factors that influence the performance of freight transit corridors, determining their relative importance through consultation with a panel of experts. Precise weights of these factors are calculated using the Fuzzy Delphi Analytical Hierarchy Process (FDAHP). Subsequently, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied to assess the relative performance of the four corridors. Additionally, scenario planning, with a specific emphasis on the Southern Corridor, is conducted. The results reveal that the Traditional Maritime Corridor secures the top position with an impressive performance index of 0.7203. The Trans-Siberian, Middle, and Southern Corridors follow as the second, third, and fourth-ranked options, with performance indices of 0.4056, 0.2864, and 0.2662, respectively. Furthermore, the scenario planning outcomes demonstrate the significant potential for performance improvement in the Southern Corridor, particularly through enhanced geopolitical stability and the elimination of intermodal operations. These measures are pivotal in enhancing the competitiveness of the Southern Corridor, positioning it favorably against the Trans-Siberian Corridor.</p>","PeriodicalId":50331,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-01011-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Southern Corridor within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), traversing Iran, signifies a potential link between China and Europe. Although not yet operational, it’s poised for competition with its well-established counterparts: the Trans-Siberian, Middle, and Traditional Maritime Corridors. This study evaluates the competitiveness of the Southern Corridor compared to these rivals, with a noteworthy focus on the Southern and Middle Corridors, which have not previously undergone quantitative evaluation alongside the Trans-Siberian and Traditional Maritime Corridors. The methodology is grounded in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). The study initiates by identifying factors that influence the performance of freight transit corridors, determining their relative importance through consultation with a panel of experts. Precise weights of these factors are calculated using the Fuzzy Delphi Analytical Hierarchy Process (FDAHP). Subsequently, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied to assess the relative performance of the four corridors. Additionally, scenario planning, with a specific emphasis on the Southern Corridor, is conducted. The results reveal that the Traditional Maritime Corridor secures the top position with an impressive performance index of 0.7203. The Trans-Siberian, Middle, and Southern Corridors follow as the second, third, and fourth-ranked options, with performance indices of 0.4056, 0.2864, and 0.2662, respectively. Furthermore, the scenario planning outcomes demonstrate the significant potential for performance improvement in the Southern Corridor, particularly through enhanced geopolitical stability and the elimination of intermodal operations. These measures are pivotal in enhancing the competitiveness of the Southern Corridor, positioning it favorably against the Trans-Siberian Corridor.

Abstract Image

利用多重标准决策分析南部通道在与中欧货运通道竞争中的潜力
穿越伊朗的 "一带一路 "倡议(BRI)南方走廊是连接中国和欧洲的潜在纽带。尽管尚未投入运营,但它已准备好与西伯利亚大通道、中通道和传统海上通道等成熟的同行竞争。本研究评估了南方大通道与这些竞争对手相比的竞争力,其中值得注意的是南方大通道和中部大通道,这两条大通道以前从未与西伯利亚大通道和传统海上通道一起接受过定量评估。研究方法以多标准决策(MCDM)为基础。研究首先确定影响货运过境通道性能的因素,并通过咨询专家小组确定这些因素的相对重要性。使用模糊德尔菲分析层次法 (FDAHP) 计算出这些因素的精确权重。随后,采用与理想解决方案相似度排序技术(TOPSIS)来评估四条走廊的相对性能。此外,还进行了以南部走廊为重点的情景规划。结果显示,传统的海上走廊以 0.7203 的出色表现指数稳居榜首。西伯利亚大通道、中部通道和南部通道分列第二、第三和第四位,性能指数分别为 0.4056、0.2864 和 0.2662。此外,情景规划结果表明,南部走廊的绩效改进潜力巨大,特别是通过加强地缘政治稳定和取消多式联运业务。这些措施对提高南部走廊的竞争力至关重要,使其在与西伯利亚大通道的竞争中处于有利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Civil Engineering, The official publication of Iranian Society of Civil Engineering and Iran University of Science and Technology is devoted to original and interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of civil engineering with similar emphasis on all topics.The journal provides a forum for the International Civil Engineering Community to present and discuss matters of major interest e.g. new developments in civil regulations, The topics are included but are not necessarily restricted to :- Structures- Geotechnics- Transportation- Environment- Earthquakes- Water Resources- Construction Engineering and Management, and New Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信