Radiomics-based analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image: A prediction nomogram for lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xiuqi Yang , Xuefei Wang , Zhichao Zuo , Weihua Zeng , Haibo Liu , Lu Zhou , Yizhou Wen , Chuang Long , Siying Tan , Xiong Li , Ying Zeng
{"title":"Radiomics-based analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image: A prediction nomogram for lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer","authors":"Xiuqi Yang ,&nbsp;Xuefei Wang ,&nbsp;Zhichao Zuo ,&nbsp;Weihua Zeng ,&nbsp;Haibo Liu ,&nbsp;Lu Zhou ,&nbsp;Yizhou Wen ,&nbsp;Chuang Long ,&nbsp;Siying Tan ,&nbsp;Xiong Li ,&nbsp;Ying Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and validate a nomogram for quantitively predicting lymphovascular invasion (LVI) of breast cancer (BC) based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomics and morphological features.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively divided 238 patients with BC into training and validation cohorts. Radiomic features from DCE-MRI were subdivided into A1 and A2, representing the first and second post-contrast images respectively. We utilized the minimal redundancy maximal relevance filter to extract radiomic features, then we employed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to screen these features and calculate individualized radiomics score (Rad score). Through the application of multivariate logistic regression, we built a prediction nomogram that integrated DCE-MRI radiomics and MR morphological features (MR-MF). The diagnostic capabilities were evaluated by comparing C-indices and calibration curves.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The diagnostic efficiency of the A1/A2 radiomics model surpassed that of the A1 and A2 alone. Furthermore, we incorporated the MR-MF (diffusion-weighted imaging rim sign, peritumoral edema) and optimized Radiomics into a hybrid nomogram. The C-indices for the training and validation cohorts were 0.868 (95% CI: 0.839–0.898) and 0.847 (95% CI: 0.787–0.907), respectively, indicating a good level of discrimination. Moreover, the calibration plots demonstrated excellent agreement in the training and validation cohorts, confirming the effectiveness of the calibration.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This nomogram combined MR-MF and A1/A2 Radiomics has the potential to preoperatively predict LVI in patients with BC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 89-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24001784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop and validate a nomogram for quantitively predicting lymphovascular invasion (LVI) of breast cancer (BC) based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomics and morphological features.

Methods

We retrospectively divided 238 patients with BC into training and validation cohorts. Radiomic features from DCE-MRI were subdivided into A1 and A2, representing the first and second post-contrast images respectively. We utilized the minimal redundancy maximal relevance filter to extract radiomic features, then we employed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to screen these features and calculate individualized radiomics score (Rad score). Through the application of multivariate logistic regression, we built a prediction nomogram that integrated DCE-MRI radiomics and MR morphological features (MR-MF). The diagnostic capabilities were evaluated by comparing C-indices and calibration curves.

Results

The diagnostic efficiency of the A1/A2 radiomics model surpassed that of the A1 and A2 alone. Furthermore, we incorporated the MR-MF (diffusion-weighted imaging rim sign, peritumoral edema) and optimized Radiomics into a hybrid nomogram. The C-indices for the training and validation cohorts were 0.868 (95% CI: 0.839–0.898) and 0.847 (95% CI: 0.787–0.907), respectively, indicating a good level of discrimination. Moreover, the calibration plots demonstrated excellent agreement in the training and validation cohorts, confirming the effectiveness of the calibration.

Conclusion

This nomogram combined MR-MF and A1/A2 Radiomics has the potential to preoperatively predict LVI in patients with BC.

基于放射组学的动态对比增强磁共振图像分析:乳腺癌淋巴管侵犯预测提名图
目的根据动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)放射组学和形态学特征,开发并验证用于定量预测乳腺癌(BC)淋巴管侵犯(LVI)的提名图:我们回顾性地将238名乳腺癌患者分为训练组和验证组。来自 DCE-MRI 的放射组学特征被细分为 A1 和 A2,分别代表第一和第二对比后图像。我们利用最小冗余最大相关性过滤器提取放射组学特征,然后利用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归筛选这些特征并计算个体化放射组学评分(Rad score)。通过应用多元逻辑回归,我们建立了一个整合了 DCE-MRI 放射组学和 MR 形态学特征(MR-MF)的预测提名图。通过比较 C 指数和校准曲线评估了诊断能力:结果:A1/A2放射组学模型的诊断效率超过了单独的 A1 和 A2 模型。此外,我们还将 MR-MF(弥散加权成像边缘征、瘤周水肿)和优化的放射组学纳入了混合提名图。训练队列和验证队列的 C 指数分别为 0.868(95% CI:0.839-0.898)和 0.847(95% CI:0.787-0.907),显示出良好的区分度。此外,校准图在训练组和验证组中显示出极好的一致性,证实了校准的有效性:该提名图结合了 MR-MF 和 A1/A2 辐射组学,有望在术前预测 BC 患者的 LVI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信