Urban flash flood prediction modelling using probabilistic and statistical approaches

Piu Saha , Rajib Mitra , Jayanta Das , Deepak Kumar Mandal
{"title":"Urban flash flood prediction modelling using probabilistic and statistical approaches","authors":"Piu Saha ,&nbsp;Rajib Mitra ,&nbsp;Jayanta Das ,&nbsp;Deepak Kumar Mandal","doi":"10.1016/j.rines.2024.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The development of a detailed strategy to mitigate the negative consequences of any natural calamities depends on accurately identifying sensitive zones where natural hazards frequently happen. In the present investigations, three widely utilized probabilistic approaches viz., frequency ratio (FR), statistical index (SI), and weighting factor (WF) have been utilized for prediction of flsh flood susceptibility zones in the Coochbehar urban and peri-urban area (CUPUA) (area = 26.22 km<sup>2</sup>). Ten flash flood conditioning factors have been used in this assessment based on previous literatures and experts' opinions. In the FR model, 29.40 % area is observed in the high and very high flood zones, whereas 36.27 % and 31.16 % area is identified in SI and WF model, respectively. The FR model demonstrates that five conditioning factors, viz., topographic position index (TPI), land use and land cover (LULC), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance to drainage (DtD) and rainfall were highly impacted in flash flood prediction (FFP) analysis; in SI model, LULC is the major influencing parameter, and in WF model LULC, rainfall, NDVI, and distance to road (DtR) are the effective parameters. The success rate curve of the FR, SI and WF models manifest SI model has highest training (AUC=0.903) and prediction (AUC=0.925) accuracy, and FR and WF also have very good accuracy as their AUC values are 0.899 and 0.877 (in success rate curve) and 0.900 and 0.881 (in prediction rate curve). Therefore, the application of probabilistic approaches in this active flash flood-prone region is excellently performed, and the results of this study will help hydrologists, engineers, and water management administrators to control the areas that are extremely susceptible to flash floods and reduce possible damages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101084,"journal":{"name":"Results in Earth Sciences","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211714824000190/pdfft?md5=d116e3ac516a7a4bb91f073961a7b3ed&pid=1-s2.0-S2211714824000190-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211714824000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of a detailed strategy to mitigate the negative consequences of any natural calamities depends on accurately identifying sensitive zones where natural hazards frequently happen. In the present investigations, three widely utilized probabilistic approaches viz., frequency ratio (FR), statistical index (SI), and weighting factor (WF) have been utilized for prediction of flsh flood susceptibility zones in the Coochbehar urban and peri-urban area (CUPUA) (area = 26.22 km2). Ten flash flood conditioning factors have been used in this assessment based on previous literatures and experts' opinions. In the FR model, 29.40 % area is observed in the high and very high flood zones, whereas 36.27 % and 31.16 % area is identified in SI and WF model, respectively. The FR model demonstrates that five conditioning factors, viz., topographic position index (TPI), land use and land cover (LULC), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance to drainage (DtD) and rainfall were highly impacted in flash flood prediction (FFP) analysis; in SI model, LULC is the major influencing parameter, and in WF model LULC, rainfall, NDVI, and distance to road (DtR) are the effective parameters. The success rate curve of the FR, SI and WF models manifest SI model has highest training (AUC=0.903) and prediction (AUC=0.925) accuracy, and FR and WF also have very good accuracy as their AUC values are 0.899 and 0.877 (in success rate curve) and 0.900 and 0.881 (in prediction rate curve). Therefore, the application of probabilistic approaches in this active flash flood-prone region is excellently performed, and the results of this study will help hydrologists, engineers, and water management administrators to control the areas that are extremely susceptible to flash floods and reduce possible damages.

利用概率和统计方法建立城市山洪预测模型
要制定详细的战略来减轻自然灾害带来的负面影响,就必须准确识别自然灾害频发的敏感区域。在本次调查中,库奇贝尔城市及近郊区(Coochbehar urban and peri-urban area,CUPUA)(面积 = 26.22 平方公里)采用了三种广泛使用的概率方法,即频率比 (FR)、统计指数 (SI) 和加权因子 (WF)。根据先前的文献和专家意见,本次评估使用了 10 个山洪爆发条件因子。在 FR 模型中,高洪水区和极高洪水区的面积占 29.40%,而在 SI 和 WF 模型中,高洪水区和极高洪水区的面积分别占 36.27% 和 31.16%。FR 模型表明,地形位置指数 (TPI)、土地利用和土地覆被 (LULC)、归一化差异植被指数 (NDVI)、到排水沟的距离 (DtD) 和降雨量这五个条件因子对山洪预测分析的影响很大;在 SI 模型中,LULC 是主要的影响参数,而在 WF 模型中,LULC、降雨量、NDVI 和到公路的距离 (DtR) 是有效参数。从 FR、SI 和 WF 模型的成功率曲线可以看出,SI 模型的训练精度(AUC=0.903)和预测精度(AUC=0.925)最高,FR 和 WF 的成功率曲线 AUC 值分别为 0.899 和 0.877,预测精度曲线 AUC 值分别为 0.900 和 0.881,具有很高的精度。因此,概率方法在这一山洪活跃易发地区的应用非常出色,研究结果将有助于水文学家、工程师和水资源管理部门控制山洪极易发生的地区,减少可能造成的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信