{"title":"Modelling level 1 situation awareness in driving: A cognitive architecture approach","authors":"Umair Rehman , Shi Cao , Carolyn G. MacGregor","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this research is to computationally model and simulate the situation awareness (SA) of drivers. A computational model in a cognitive architecture was developed that can interact with a driving simulator to infer quantitative predictions of drivers’ SA. The model uses the Queueing Network Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (QN-ACTR) framework as a foundation and integrates a dynamic visual sampling model (SEEV) to create QN-ACTR-SA, which simulates attention allocation patterns of human drivers at SA Level 1 (i.e., perception of critical elements). QN-ACTR-SA also incorporates a driver model that can interact with a driving simulator. A validation study was conducted to determine whether Level 1 SA results produced with the QN-ACTR-SA model correspond to empirical data collected from human drivers (14 participants) for the same tasks. Both QN-ACTR-SA and human participants were probed for SA using two approaches: within-task queries using the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) and post-experiment questions. A comparative assessment demonstrated that QN-ACTR-SA could reasonably simulate drivers’ Level 1 SA for two driving conditions: easy (with few vehicles and signboards) and complex (with dense traffic and signboards). QN-ACTR-SA fit for human SAGAT scores (possible range 0–100) resulted in a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5.0% and the root means square error (RMSE) of 3.5. Model fit for post-experiment human SA results was MAPE of 6.7% and RMSE of 6.1. Limitations of QN-ACTR-SA as a predictive model and areas of future research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24002584","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The goal of this research is to computationally model and simulate the situation awareness (SA) of drivers. A computational model in a cognitive architecture was developed that can interact with a driving simulator to infer quantitative predictions of drivers’ SA. The model uses the Queueing Network Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (QN-ACTR) framework as a foundation and integrates a dynamic visual sampling model (SEEV) to create QN-ACTR-SA, which simulates attention allocation patterns of human drivers at SA Level 1 (i.e., perception of critical elements). QN-ACTR-SA also incorporates a driver model that can interact with a driving simulator. A validation study was conducted to determine whether Level 1 SA results produced with the QN-ACTR-SA model correspond to empirical data collected from human drivers (14 participants) for the same tasks. Both QN-ACTR-SA and human participants were probed for SA using two approaches: within-task queries using the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) and post-experiment questions. A comparative assessment demonstrated that QN-ACTR-SA could reasonably simulate drivers’ Level 1 SA for two driving conditions: easy (with few vehicles and signboards) and complex (with dense traffic and signboards). QN-ACTR-SA fit for human SAGAT scores (possible range 0–100) resulted in a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5.0% and the root means square error (RMSE) of 3.5. Model fit for post-experiment human SA results was MAPE of 6.7% and RMSE of 6.1. Limitations of QN-ACTR-SA as a predictive model and areas of future research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.