Effect of tow duration, door spread, and swept area on the catch efficiency of a bottom trawl

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Casper W. Berg , Kai Wieland , Anna Rindorf
{"title":"Effect of tow duration, door spread, and swept area on the catch efficiency of a bottom trawl","authors":"Casper W. Berg ,&nbsp;Kai Wieland ,&nbsp;Anna Rindorf","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trawl surveys are key to estimating changes in fish abundance, distribution and biodiversity. When tow by tow sampling effort in a survey has not been constant, catch rates are often standardized by swept area or haul duration. The nominal tow duration in the North Sea International Bottom Trawl Survey (NS-IBTS) has varied substantially, providing opportunity to test whether the underlying assumption of proportionality between catch and effort is confirmed by data. Here the effects of various effort metrics on indices of biomass are evaluated and compared for the three most common orders of species (gadiformes, pleuronectiformes, and clupeiformes) and two size groups in the North Sea using the NS-IBTS data. Tow duration is found to be a better effort metric than swept area in all cases. Catch is almost proportional to tow duration for gadiformes and pleuronectiformes, although shorter tows have higher catch rates, but for clupeiformes tow duration has no or little effect on expected catch. The relationship between catch and door spread is negatively correlated for clupeiformes, while only weak effects of door spread are found for the other species. Our findings have significant effects on standardized survey indices from NS-IBTS data due to the systematic change in tow-by-tow effort. Similar biases potentially occurs in all surveys where effort varies between hauls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624001723/pdfft?md5=597f0b1bb01ca00473f08d22a5837cc4&pid=1-s2.0-S0165783624001723-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624001723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trawl surveys are key to estimating changes in fish abundance, distribution and biodiversity. When tow by tow sampling effort in a survey has not been constant, catch rates are often standardized by swept area or haul duration. The nominal tow duration in the North Sea International Bottom Trawl Survey (NS-IBTS) has varied substantially, providing opportunity to test whether the underlying assumption of proportionality between catch and effort is confirmed by data. Here the effects of various effort metrics on indices of biomass are evaluated and compared for the three most common orders of species (gadiformes, pleuronectiformes, and clupeiformes) and two size groups in the North Sea using the NS-IBTS data. Tow duration is found to be a better effort metric than swept area in all cases. Catch is almost proportional to tow duration for gadiformes and pleuronectiformes, although shorter tows have higher catch rates, but for clupeiformes tow duration has no or little effect on expected catch. The relationship between catch and door spread is negatively correlated for clupeiformes, while only weak effects of door spread are found for the other species. Our findings have significant effects on standardized survey indices from NS-IBTS data due to the systematic change in tow-by-tow effort. Similar biases potentially occurs in all surveys where effort varies between hauls.

拖网持续时间、门差和扫面对底拖网捕捞效率的影响
拖网调查是估算鱼类丰度、分布和生物多样性变化的关键。当调查中逐条拖网的取样努力量不稳定时,渔获率通常会按扫过区域或拖网持续时间进行标准化。北海国际海底拖网调查(NS-IBTS)的名义拖网持续时间变化很大,这为检验渔获量与努力量之间的基本假设是否得到数据证实提供了机会。本文利用 NS-IBTS 数据,针对北海最常见的三个纲(鳕形目、褶形目和褐鳕形目)和两个体型组,评估和比较了各种努力度指标对生物量指数的影响。研究发现,在所有情况下,拖网时间都是比扫荡面积更好的渔获量指标。鳕形目和褶形目渔获量几乎与拖网时间成正比,尽管拖网时间越短渔获率越高,但对于鳞鳕形目来说,拖网时间对预期渔获量没有影响或影响很小。鳞栉水母类的渔获量与拖网宽度呈负相关,而拖网宽度对其他物种的影响较弱。由于各拖网渔获量的系统性变化,我们的发现对来自 NS-IBTS 数据的标准化调查指数有重大影响。类似的偏差可能会出现在所有调查中,因为不同拖网之间的努力量是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fisheries Research
Fisheries Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信