Ekaterina Baron, Chih Ching Wu, Andrei Nikiforchin, Raquel Abengozar Mingorance, Stephanie C. Carr, Jessica A. Wernberg, Rohit Sharma
{"title":"Risk factors of a positive resection margin in locoregional appendix cancer and its impact on survival: The national cancer database analysis","authors":"Ekaterina Baron, Chih Ching Wu, Andrei Nikiforchin, Raquel Abengozar Mingorance, Stephanie C. Carr, Jessica A. Wernberg, Rohit Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The impact of a positive resection margin (RM+) in appendiceal cancer (AC) remains unclear, with small studies suggesting it does not worsen survival in low-grade subtypes. We aimed to evaluate RM+ rates, its risk factors, and survival outcomes across different AC histologies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004–2019) and including stage I-III AC cases. Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between RM+ and RM- groups, with logistic regression analyzing the association of RM+ and its predictors. Subgroup analysis was performed for low/high tumor grade (LG/HG), mucinous/non-mucinous pathology (MAC/NMAC), and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 6800 patients identified, 737 (10.8 %) had RM+, while 6063 (89.2 %) had RM-. RM+ rates varied across AC histologies: 10.9 % in LG-MAC, 17.0 % in HG-MAC, 7.8 % in LG-NMAC, 13.9 % in HG-NMAC, and 17.9 % in SRC. RM+ correlated with significantly worse survival in LG-MAC (HR 1.67), HG-MAC (HR 1.83), LG-NMAC (HR 2.04), and SRC (HR 2.37) but not in HG-NMAC after adjusting to other factors. Predictors of RM+ included pT stage, preoperative chemotherapy in LG tumors and pT stage and positive lymph nodes in HG tumors whereas more extensive resection was associated with RM- in both LG and HG.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RM+ worsens survival in most AC subtypes, highlighting the importance of achieving negative margins. Extensive resection, like right hemicolectomy, can improve RM- rate, but factors such as pT stage, lymph node status, and preoperative chemotherapy also affect RM+. Surgeons should prioritize achieving RM- in all AC histologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100072"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000811/pdfft?md5=bea5968875967fb0b29097f4858ba440&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000811-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The impact of a positive resection margin (RM+) in appendiceal cancer (AC) remains unclear, with small studies suggesting it does not worsen survival in low-grade subtypes. We aimed to evaluate RM+ rates, its risk factors, and survival outcomes across different AC histologies.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004–2019) and including stage I-III AC cases. Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between RM+ and RM- groups, with logistic regression analyzing the association of RM+ and its predictors. Subgroup analysis was performed for low/high tumor grade (LG/HG), mucinous/non-mucinous pathology (MAC/NMAC), and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC).
Results
Among 6800 patients identified, 737 (10.8 %) had RM+, while 6063 (89.2 %) had RM-. RM+ rates varied across AC histologies: 10.9 % in LG-MAC, 17.0 % in HG-MAC, 7.8 % in LG-NMAC, 13.9 % in HG-NMAC, and 17.9 % in SRC. RM+ correlated with significantly worse survival in LG-MAC (HR 1.67), HG-MAC (HR 1.83), LG-NMAC (HR 2.04), and SRC (HR 2.37) but not in HG-NMAC after adjusting to other factors. Predictors of RM+ included pT stage, preoperative chemotherapy in LG tumors and pT stage and positive lymph nodes in HG tumors whereas more extensive resection was associated with RM- in both LG and HG.
Conclusion
RM+ worsens survival in most AC subtypes, highlighting the importance of achieving negative margins. Extensive resection, like right hemicolectomy, can improve RM- rate, but factors such as pT stage, lymph node status, and preoperative chemotherapy also affect RM+. Surgeons should prioritize achieving RM- in all AC histologies.