A Retrospective External Validation of the Cleveland Clinic Malignancy Probability Prediction Model for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules

Michal M. Reid MD , Jack J. Amja MD , Irene T. Riestra Guiance MD , Rupesh R. Andani MBBS , Robert A. Vierkant MS , Amit Goyal MD , Janani S. Reisenauer MD
{"title":"A Retrospective External Validation of the Cleveland Clinic Malignancy Probability Prediction Model for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules","authors":"Michal M. Reid MD ,&nbsp;Jack J. Amja MD ,&nbsp;Irene T. Riestra Guiance MD ,&nbsp;Rupesh R. Andani MBBS ,&nbsp;Robert A. Vierkant MS ,&nbsp;Amit Goyal MD ,&nbsp;Janani S. Reisenauer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To perform a retrospective, multicenter, external validation of the Cleveland Clinic malignancy probability prediction model for incidental pulmonary nodules.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>From July 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, we identified 296 patients who underwent tissue acquisition at Mayo Clinic (MC) (n=198) and Loyola University Medical Center (n=98) with histopathology indicating malignant (n=195) or benign (n=101). Data was collected at initial radiographic identification (point 1) and at the time of intervention (point 2). Point 3 represented the most recent data. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics were calculated for each model per time point. Calibration was evaluated by comparing the predicted and observed rates of malignancy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The areas under the receiver operating characteristics at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the MC model were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58-0.77), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76), respectively. The Cleveland Clinic model (CCM) was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.84), and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78), respectively. The mean ± SD estimated probability for malignant pulmonary nodules (PNs) at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the CCM was 64.2±25.9, 65.8±24.0, and 64.7±24.4, which resembled the overall proportion of malignant PNs (66%). The mean estimated probability of malignancy for the MC model at each time point was 38.3±27.4, 36.2±24.4, and 42.1±27.3, substantially lower than the observed proportion of malignancies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The CCM found discrimination similar to its internal validation and good calibration. The CCM can be used to augment clinical and shared decision-making when evaluating high-risk PNs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000365/pdfft?md5=92d34d2a2f83aec8732ab6a8e112463c&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000365-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To perform a retrospective, multicenter, external validation of the Cleveland Clinic malignancy probability prediction model for incidental pulmonary nodules.

Patients and Methods

From July 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, we identified 296 patients who underwent tissue acquisition at Mayo Clinic (MC) (n=198) and Loyola University Medical Center (n=98) with histopathology indicating malignant (n=195) or benign (n=101). Data was collected at initial radiographic identification (point 1) and at the time of intervention (point 2). Point 3 represented the most recent data. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics were calculated for each model per time point. Calibration was evaluated by comparing the predicted and observed rates of malignancy.

Results

The areas under the receiver operating characteristics at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the MC model were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58-0.77), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76), respectively. The Cleveland Clinic model (CCM) was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.84), and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78), respectively. The mean ± SD estimated probability for malignant pulmonary nodules (PNs) at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the CCM was 64.2±25.9, 65.8±24.0, and 64.7±24.4, which resembled the overall proportion of malignant PNs (66%). The mean estimated probability of malignancy for the MC model at each time point was 38.3±27.4, 36.2±24.4, and 42.1±27.3, substantially lower than the observed proportion of malignancies.

Conclusion

The CCM found discrimination similar to its internal validation and good calibration. The CCM can be used to augment clinical and shared decision-making when evaluating high-risk PNs.

克利夫兰诊所不确定肺结节恶性概率预测模型的回顾性外部验证
患者和方法从 2022 年 7 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日,我们确定了在梅奥诊所(Mayo Clinic,MC)(n=198)和洛约拉大学医学中心(Loyola University Medical Center,Loyola University Medical Center)(n=98)进行组织采集的 296 例患者,这些患者的组织病理学显示为恶性(n=195)或良性(n=101)。数据收集于最初的放射学鉴定(第1点)和干预时(第2点)。第 3 点代表最新数据。每个模型在每个时间点的接收者操作特征下的面积都被计算出来。结果MC模型在时间点1、2和3的受体操作特征下面积分别为0.67(95% CI,0.61-0.74)、0.67(95% CI,0.58-0.77)和0.70(95% CI,0.63-0.76)。克利夫兰诊所模型(CCM)分别为 0.68(95% CI,0.61-0.74)、0.75(95% CI,0.65-0.84)和 0.72(95% CI,0.66-0.78)。CCM在时间点1、2和3的恶性肺结节(PNs)估计概率的平均值(±SD)分别为64.2±25.9、65.8±24.0和64.7±24.4,与恶性PNs的总体比例(66%)相似。MC 模型在每个时间点的平均恶性肿瘤估计概率分别为 38.3±27.4、36.2±24.4 和 42.1±27.3,大大低于观察到的恶性肿瘤比例。在评估高风险 PN 时,CCM 可用于辅助临床和共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信