Delirium prevention and management in an adult intensive care unit through evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions: A scoping review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Gideon U. Johnson , Amanda Towell-Barnard , Christopher McLean , Beverley Ewens
{"title":"Delirium prevention and management in an adult intensive care unit through evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions: A scoping review","authors":"Gideon U. Johnson ,&nbsp;Amanda Towell-Barnard ,&nbsp;Christopher McLean ,&nbsp;Beverley Ewens","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To map and review current literature to describe evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions for delirium prevention and management in adult critically ill patients.</p></div><div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Previous research has demonstrated the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions for intensive care unit (ICU) delirium; however, the heterogeneity and complexity of these interventions make it challenging to disseminate and integrate into clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This scoping review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Protocol Guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, PsycINFO, JBI, ProQuest, and Excerpta Medica databases were searched until August 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><p>Double screening, extraction, and data coding using thematic analysis and frequency counts. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines using the extension for scoping reviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-three primary research articles were included; thirty-one were quantitative, and two were qualitative. Four categories of interventions were identified: instrument-based therapeutic interventions (n = 10) consisting of the use of music, light, mirror, and occupational therapy; nurse-led interventions (n = 5) consisting of interventions directly delivered by the nurses with mobilisation, orientation, and cognitive stimulation being the most common types of intervention. Family-delivered interventions (n = 5) are delivered directly by family members, with extended visitation and orientation being the most utilised. Multicomponent interventions (n = 13) combine different aspects of single interventions into care bundles and programs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review identified a lack of consistency in applying nonpharmacologic interventions to prevent and manage delirium in adult ICUs. Standardised evidence-based guidelines addressing all aspects of single-component or multicomponent nonpharmacological delirium interventions, along with support for ICU staff utilising these interventions and family member education and support, are required. Without consistent involvement from the healthcare team and patient families, opportunities may have been lost to optimise family-centred care practices in critical care settings.</p></div><div><h3>Patient or public contribution</h3><p>No patient or public contribution was necessary for this review.</p></div><div><h3>Protocol registration</h3><p>The protocol registration for this review can be accessed via Open Science Framework at <span>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CMQWG</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 4","pages":"Pages 232-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000295/pdfft?md5=ba2aaaafa709411c08d8506fd3a2823f&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769624000295-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To map and review current literature to describe evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions for delirium prevention and management in adult critically ill patients.

Introduction

Previous research has demonstrated the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions for intensive care unit (ICU) delirium; however, the heterogeneity and complexity of these interventions make it challenging to disseminate and integrate into clinical practice.

Design

This scoping review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Protocol Guidelines.

Data sources

Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, PsycINFO, JBI, ProQuest, and Excerpta Medica databases were searched until August 2023.

Review methods

Double screening, extraction, and data coding using thematic analysis and frequency counts. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines using the extension for scoping reviews.

Results

Thirty-three primary research articles were included; thirty-one were quantitative, and two were qualitative. Four categories of interventions were identified: instrument-based therapeutic interventions (n = 10) consisting of the use of music, light, mirror, and occupational therapy; nurse-led interventions (n = 5) consisting of interventions directly delivered by the nurses with mobilisation, orientation, and cognitive stimulation being the most common types of intervention. Family-delivered interventions (n = 5) are delivered directly by family members, with extended visitation and orientation being the most utilised. Multicomponent interventions (n = 13) combine different aspects of single interventions into care bundles and programs.

Conclusion

This review identified a lack of consistency in applying nonpharmacologic interventions to prevent and manage delirium in adult ICUs. Standardised evidence-based guidelines addressing all aspects of single-component or multicomponent nonpharmacological delirium interventions, along with support for ICU staff utilising these interventions and family member education and support, are required. Without consistent involvement from the healthcare team and patient families, opportunities may have been lost to optimise family-centred care practices in critical care settings.

Patient or public contribution

No patient or public contribution was necessary for this review.

Protocol registration

The protocol registration for this review can be accessed via Open Science Framework at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CMQWG.

通过循证非药物干预预防和管理成人重症监护病房中的谵妄:范围界定综述
目的对目前的文献进行梳理和回顾,以描述成人重症患者谵妄预防和管理的循证非药物干预方法。引言以往的研究已经证明了重症监护病房(ICU)谵妄非药物干预方法的有效性;然而,这些干预方法的异质性和复杂性使其在临床实践中的推广和整合面临挑战。数据来源检索了《护理与专职医疗文献累积索引》、《医学文献分析与检索系统在线》、PsycINFO、JBI、ProQuest 和 Excerpta Medica 等数据库,检索期至 2023 年 8 月。报告遵循《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,并使用了范围界定综述的扩展项。结果共纳入 33 篇主要研究文章;其中 31 篇为定量研究,2 篇为定性研究。共确定了四类干预措施:基于仪器的治疗干预措施(n = 10),包括使用音乐、灯光、镜子和职业疗法;由护士主导的干预措施(n = 5),包括由护士直接提供的干预措施,其中最常见的干预类型是移动、定向和认知刺激。家庭成员提供的干预(5 人)由家庭成员直接提供,其中最常用的是延伸探视和引导。多组分干预措施(n = 13)将单一干预措施的不同方面结合到护理捆绑和计划中。结论本综述发现,在应用非药物干预措施预防和管理成人重症监护病房谵妄方面缺乏一致性。需要制定标准化的循证指南,以解决单组分或多组分非药物性谵妄干预措施的各个方面问题,同时为使用这些干预措施的 ICU 员工提供支持,并为家庭成员提供教育和支持。如果没有医疗团队和患者家属的持续参与,可能会失去在重症监护环境中优化以家庭为中心的护理实践的机会。患者或公众贡献本综述无需患者或公众贡献。协议注册本综述的协议注册可通过开放科学框架访问:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CMQWG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信