Effect of suckler cow breed type and parity on the development of the cow-calf bond post-partum and calf passive immunity.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Noeleen Brereton, Mark McGee, Marijke Beltman, Colin J Byrne, David Meredith, Bernadette Earley
{"title":"Effect of suckler cow breed type and parity on the development of the cow-calf bond post-partum and calf passive immunity.","authors":"Noeleen Brereton, Mark McGee, Marijke Beltman, Colin J Byrne, David Meredith, Bernadette Earley","doi":"10.1186/s13620-024-00276-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Development of the cow-calf bond post-partum and passive immunity of calves from spring-calving beef × beef (B×B) and beef × dairy (B×D) cow genotypes was determined using primiparous and multiparous (Experiment 1), and primiparous and second-parity (Experiment 2) animals. In Experiment 1, calves either suckled colostrum naturally ('natural-suckling') (n = 126), or were fed colostrum, using an oesophageal-tube ('artificially-fed') (n = 26), from their dam within 1-h post-partum. In Experiment 2, all calves (n = 60) were artificially-fed colostrum from their dam. Prior to colostrum suckling/feeding, colostrum was sampled for IgG analysis. The cow-calf bond was assessed using CCTV recordings during the first 4-h post-partum. Calves were blood sampled at 48-h post-partum to determine IgG and total protein (TP) concentrations, and zinc sulphate turbidity (ZST) units.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference (P > 0.05) in cow licking behaviours and calf standing and suckling behaviours between the genotypes, except in Experiment 2 where B×D calves had more attempts to suckle before suckling occurred (P ≤ 0.05) compared to B×B calves. In Experiment 1, multiparous cows licked their calves sooner (P ≤ 0.05) and for longer (P < 0.01), and their calves had fewer attempts to stand (P < 0.001), stood for longer (P = 0.05), and had fewer attempts to suckle before suckling occurred (P < 0.001) than primiparous cows; there was no parity effect on cow-calf behaviour in Experiment 2. Colostrum IgG concentrations and measures of calf passive immunity did not differ (P > 0.05) between the genotypes in either Experiment. In Experiment 1, colostrum IgG concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in multiparous compared to primiparous cows and their calves had superior (P ≤ 0.05) passive immunity; no effect of parity was found in Experiment 2. Passive immunity did not differ (P > 0.05) between suckled and artificially-fed calves in Experiment 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cow genotype had little effect on cow-calf behaviours, but under 'natural-suckling' conditions primiparous cows expressed maternal inexperience and their calves were less vigorous than multiparous cows. Colostrum IgG concentration and calf passive immunity measures were unaffected by genotype, but under 'natural-suckling' conditions calves from primiparous cows had lower passive immunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54916,"journal":{"name":"Irish Veterinary Journal","volume":"77 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-024-00276-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Development of the cow-calf bond post-partum and passive immunity of calves from spring-calving beef × beef (B×B) and beef × dairy (B×D) cow genotypes was determined using primiparous and multiparous (Experiment 1), and primiparous and second-parity (Experiment 2) animals. In Experiment 1, calves either suckled colostrum naturally ('natural-suckling') (n = 126), or were fed colostrum, using an oesophageal-tube ('artificially-fed') (n = 26), from their dam within 1-h post-partum. In Experiment 2, all calves (n = 60) were artificially-fed colostrum from their dam. Prior to colostrum suckling/feeding, colostrum was sampled for IgG analysis. The cow-calf bond was assessed using CCTV recordings during the first 4-h post-partum. Calves were blood sampled at 48-h post-partum to determine IgG and total protein (TP) concentrations, and zinc sulphate turbidity (ZST) units.

Results: There was no difference (P > 0.05) in cow licking behaviours and calf standing and suckling behaviours between the genotypes, except in Experiment 2 where B×D calves had more attempts to suckle before suckling occurred (P ≤ 0.05) compared to B×B calves. In Experiment 1, multiparous cows licked their calves sooner (P ≤ 0.05) and for longer (P < 0.01), and their calves had fewer attempts to stand (P < 0.001), stood for longer (P = 0.05), and had fewer attempts to suckle before suckling occurred (P < 0.001) than primiparous cows; there was no parity effect on cow-calf behaviour in Experiment 2. Colostrum IgG concentrations and measures of calf passive immunity did not differ (P > 0.05) between the genotypes in either Experiment. In Experiment 1, colostrum IgG concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in multiparous compared to primiparous cows and their calves had superior (P ≤ 0.05) passive immunity; no effect of parity was found in Experiment 2. Passive immunity did not differ (P > 0.05) between suckled and artificially-fed calves in Experiment 1.

Conclusions: Cow genotype had little effect on cow-calf behaviours, but under 'natural-suckling' conditions primiparous cows expressed maternal inexperience and their calves were less vigorous than multiparous cows. Colostrum IgG concentration and calf passive immunity measures were unaffected by genotype, but under 'natural-suckling' conditions calves from primiparous cows had lower passive immunity.

乳牛品种类型和胎次对产后母牛与犊牛关系发展和犊牛被动免疫的影响。
背景:使用初产母牛和多胎母牛(实验 1)以及初产母牛和二胎母牛(实验 2)测定了春季产犊的肉牛×肉牛(B×B)和肉牛×奶牛(B×D)母牛基因型的犊牛产后母牛与犊牛关系的发展以及犊牛的被动免疫能力。在实验 1 中,犊牛要么自然吮吸初乳("自然吮吸")(126 头),要么在产后 1 小时内用食道管喂食母牛初乳("人工喂食")(26 头)。在实验 2 中,所有犊牛(n = 60)都从母牛处人工喂食初乳。在吮吸/喂食初乳之前,取初乳样本进行 IgG 分析。在产后 4 小时内,使用 CCTV 录像评估母牛与犊牛的关系。产后48小时对犊牛进行血液采样,以测定IgG和总蛋白(TP)浓度以及硫酸锌浊度(ZST)单位:结果:不同基因型的母牛舔犊行为、犊牛站立和哺乳行为没有差异(P > 0.05),但在实验 2 中,与 B×B 型犊牛相比,B×D 型犊牛在哺乳前尝试哺乳的次数更多(P ≤ 0.05)。在实验 1 中,多胎母牛舔舐犊牛的时间(P ≤ 0.05)和持续时间(P 0.05)在任一实验的基因型之间存在差异。在实验 1 中,多胎母牛的初乳 IgG 浓度比初产母牛高(P ≤ 0.05),其犊牛的被动免疫能力也更强(P ≤ 0.05);在实验 2 中未发现胎次的影响。在实验 1 中,哺乳犊牛和人工喂养犊牛的被动免疫能力没有差异(P > 0.05):母牛基因型对母牛和犊牛的行为影响不大,但在 "自然哺乳 "条件下,初产母牛表现出母性经验不足,其犊牛的活力低于多胎母牛。初乳IgG浓度和犊牛被动免疫能力不受基因型影响,但在 "自然哺乳 "条件下,初产母牛的犊牛被动免疫能力较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Veterinary Journal
Irish Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Irish Veterinary Journal is an open access journal with a vision to make a substantial contribution to the dissemination of evidence-based knowledge that will promote optimal health and welfare of both domestic and wild species of animals. Irish Veterinary Journal has a clinical research focus with an emphasis on the effective management of health in both individual and populations of animals. Published studies will be relevant to both the international veterinary profession and veterinary scientists. Papers relating to veterinary education, veterinary ethics, veterinary public health, or relevant studies in the area of social science (participatory research) are also within the scope of Irish Veterinary Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信