Pilot postal birth cohort hepatitis C virus screening in UK primary care: HepCAPP study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-30 Print Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0219
Ruth Simmons, Annabel A Powell, Samreen Ijaz, Sema Mandal, Justin Shute, Yasmin Mohammadi, Michael Lattimore, Kelsey McOwat, Hannah L Moore, Aisling O'Rourke, Monica Desai, John Macleod, Asra Asgharzadeh, Zoe Ward, Peter Vickerman, Ross J Harris, Graham R Foster, Kirsty Roberts, Matthew Hickman
{"title":"Pilot postal birth cohort hepatitis C virus screening in UK primary care: HepCAPP study.","authors":"Ruth Simmons, Annabel A Powell, Samreen Ijaz, Sema Mandal, Justin Shute, Yasmin Mohammadi, Michael Lattimore, Kelsey McOwat, Hannah L Moore, Aisling O'Rourke, Monica Desai, John Macleod, Asra Asgharzadeh, Zoe Ward, Peter Vickerman, Ross J Harris, Graham R Foster, Kirsty Roberts, Matthew Hickman","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Birth cohort screening has been implemented in some countries to identify the potentially 'missed population' of people with undiagnosed chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) who may not be found through targeted approaches.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine uptake of HCV antibody testing using an oral swab screening method, the overall yield, whether those testing positive had risk markers in their primary care record, and the cost per case detected.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This was a pilot screening study set in general practices in the Southwest of England, Yorkshire and Humber, and South London.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants consenting were sent an oral swab kit in the post and saliva samples were tested for antibodies to HCV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 16 436/98 396 (16.7%) patients consented and were sent an oral swab kit. Of these, 12 216 (12.4%) returned a kit, with 31 participants (yield 0.03%) testing positive for HCV antibodies. Of those positive, 14/35 (45%) had a risk marker for HCV on their primary care record. Two (yield 0.002%) were confirmed RNA positive and referred for treatment, both had HCV risk markers. The cost per case was £16 000 per HCV antibody detected and £247 997 per chronic HCV detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wide-scale screening could be delivered and identify people infected with HCV, however, most of these individuals could have been detected through lower-cost targeted screening. The yield and cost per case found in patients were substantially worse than model estimates and targeted screening studies. Birth cohort screening should not be rolled out in primary care in England.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e122-e128"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Birth cohort screening has been implemented in some countries to identify the potentially 'missed population' of people with undiagnosed chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) who may not be found through targeted approaches.

Aim: To determine uptake of HCV antibody testing using an oral swab screening method, the overall yield, whether those testing positive had risk markers in their primary care record, and the cost per case detected.

Design and setting: This was a pilot screening study set in general practices in the Southwest of England, Yorkshire and Humber, and South London.

Method: Participants consenting were sent an oral swab kit in the post and saliva samples were tested for antibodies to HCV.

Results: In total, 16 436/98 396 (16.7%) patients consented and were sent an oral swab kit. Of these, 12 216 (12.4%) returned a kit, with 31 participants (yield 0.03%) testing positive for HCV antibodies. Of those positive, 14/35 (45%) had a risk marker for HCV on their primary care record. Two (yield 0.002%) were confirmed RNA positive and referred for treatment, both had HCV risk markers. The cost per case was £16 000 per HCV antibody detected and £247 997 per chronic HCV detected.

Conclusion: Wide-scale screening could be delivered and identify people infected with HCV, however, most of these individuals could have been detected through lower-cost targeted screening. The yield and cost per case found in patients were substantially worse than model estimates and targeted screening studies. Birth cohort screening should not be rolled out in primary care in England.

在英国初级医疗机构开展试点邮寄出生队列丙型肝炎病毒筛查。
背景:目的:确定使用口腔拭子筛查方法进行 HCV 抗体检测的接受率、总体收益、检测呈阳性者的初级保健记录中是否有风险标记物,以及检测到每例病例的成本:试点筛查研究在西南部、伦敦南部、约克郡和汉伯郡的全科诊所进行:方法:征得同意的参与者邮寄口腔拭子试剂盒,并对唾液样本进行 HCV 抗体检测:16,436/98,396(16.7%)名患者同意并收到了口腔拭子试剂盒。12,216 人(12.4%)交回了试剂盒,其中 31 人(0.03%)的 HCV 抗体检测呈阳性。其中 45% 的阳性者在其初级保健记录中带有 HCV 风险标记。两名参与者(阳性率为 0.002%)被确诊为 RNA 阳性并转诊接受治疗,两人都有 HCV 风险标记。每例检测到的 HCV 抗体成本为 16,000 英镑,每例慢性 HCV 成本为 247,997 英镑:结论:大范围筛查可以发现感染 HCV 的人群,但其中大部分人本可以通过成本较低的定向筛查发现。发现的每个病例的产量和成本大大低于模型估计值和针对性筛查研究。出生队列筛查不应在英格兰的初级保健中推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信