Genetic Interventions for Spinocerebellar Ataxia and Huntington's Disease: A Qualitative Study of the Patient Perspective.

IF 2.1 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Nienke J H van Os, Mayke Oosterloo, Brigitte A B Essers, Janneke P C Grutters, Bart P C van de Warrenburg
{"title":"Genetic Interventions for Spinocerebellar Ataxia and Huntington's Disease: A Qualitative Study of the Patient Perspective.","authors":"Nienke J H van Os, Mayke Oosterloo, Brigitte A B Essers, Janneke P C Grutters, Bart P C van de Warrenburg","doi":"10.3233/JHD-240026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For various genetic disorders characterized by expanded cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeats, such as spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) subtypes and Huntington's disease (HD), genetic interventions are currently being tested in different clinical trial phases. The patient's perspective on such interventions should be included in the further development and implementation of these new treatments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To obtain insight into the thoughts and perspectives of individuals with SCA and HD on genetic interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, participants were interviewed using semi-structured interview techniques. Topics discussed were possible risks and benefits, and logistic factors such as timing, location and expertise. Data were analyzed using a generic thematic analysis. Responses were coded into superordinate themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants (five with SCA and five with HD) were interviewed. In general, participants seemed to be willing to undergo genetic interventions. Important motives were the lack of alternative disease-modifying treatment options, the hope for slowing down disease progression, and preservation of current quality of life. Before undergoing genetic interventions, participants wished to be further informed. Logistic factors such as mode and frequency of administration, expertise of the healthcare provider, and timing of treatment are of influence in the decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified assumptions, motives, and topics that require further attention before these new therapies, if proven effective, can be implemented in clinical practice. The results may help in the design of care pathways for genetic interventions for these and other rare genetic movement disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":16042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huntington's disease","volume":" ","pages":"321-328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huntington's disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JHD-240026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For various genetic disorders characterized by expanded cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeats, such as spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) subtypes and Huntington's disease (HD), genetic interventions are currently being tested in different clinical trial phases. The patient's perspective on such interventions should be included in the further development and implementation of these new treatments.

Objective: To obtain insight into the thoughts and perspectives of individuals with SCA and HD on genetic interventions.

Methods: In this qualitative study, participants were interviewed using semi-structured interview techniques. Topics discussed were possible risks and benefits, and logistic factors such as timing, location and expertise. Data were analyzed using a generic thematic analysis. Responses were coded into superordinate themes.

Results: Ten participants (five with SCA and five with HD) were interviewed. In general, participants seemed to be willing to undergo genetic interventions. Important motives were the lack of alternative disease-modifying treatment options, the hope for slowing down disease progression, and preservation of current quality of life. Before undergoing genetic interventions, participants wished to be further informed. Logistic factors such as mode and frequency of administration, expertise of the healthcare provider, and timing of treatment are of influence in the decision-making process.

Conclusions: This study identified assumptions, motives, and topics that require further attention before these new therapies, if proven effective, can be implemented in clinical practice. The results may help in the design of care pathways for genetic interventions for these and other rare genetic movement disorders.

脊髓小脑共济失调症和亨廷顿舞蹈症的基因干预:对患者观点的定性研究。
背景:对于以胞嘧啶-腺嘌呤-鸟嘌呤(CAG)重复序列扩增为特征的各种遗传性疾病,如脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA)亚型和亨廷顿氏病(HD),目前正在不同的临床试验阶段对遗传干预措施进行测试。在进一步开发和实施这些新疗法的过程中,应纳入患者对此类干预措施的看法:深入了解自闭症和 HD 患者对遗传干预的想法和观点:在这项定性研究中,采用半结构化访谈技术对参与者进行了访谈。讨论的主题包括可能的风险和益处,以及时间、地点和专业知识等后勤因素。采用通用主题分析法对数据进行分析。结果:10 位参与者(5 位患有自闭症,5 位患有 HD)接受了访谈。总的来说,参与者似乎愿意接受基因干预。重要的动机是缺乏其他可改变疾病的治疗方案、希望减缓疾病的进展以及保持现有的生活质量。在接受基因干预之前,参与者希望进一步了解相关信息。在决策过程中,用药方式和频率、医疗服务提供者的专业知识以及治疗时机等后勤因素都会产生影响:本研究确定了在这些新疗法被证明有效并在临床实践中实施之前需要进一步关注的假设、动机和主题。研究结果可能有助于为这些及其他罕见遗传性运动障碍的遗传干预设计护理路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信