Predictors of successful neonatal intubation in inexperienced operators: a secondary, non-randomised analysis of the SHINE trial.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Kate Alison Hodgson, Sharoan Selvakumaran, Kate Louise Francis, Louise S Owen, Sophie E Newman, Camille Omar Farouk Kamlin, Susan Donath, Calum T Roberts, Peter G Davis, Brett James Manley
{"title":"Predictors of successful neonatal intubation in inexperienced operators: a secondary, non-randomised analysis of the SHINE trial.","authors":"Kate Alison Hodgson, Sharoan Selvakumaran, Kate Louise Francis, Louise S Owen, Sophie E Newman, Camille Omar Farouk Kamlin, Susan Donath, Calum T Roberts, Peter G Davis, Brett James Manley","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neonatal endotracheal intubation is a lifesaving but technically difficult procedure, particularly for inexperienced operators. This secondary analysis in a subgroup of inexperienced operators of the Stabilization with nasal High flow during Intubation of NEonates randomised trial aimed to identify the factors associated with successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological stability of the infant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis, demographic factors were compared between infants intubated by inexperienced operators and those intubated by experienced operators. Following this, for inexperienced operators only, predictors of successful intubation without physiological instability were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 251 intubations in 202 infants were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis of the main trial. Inexperienced operators were more likely to perform intubations in larger and more mature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit where premedications were used. When intubations were performed by inexperienced operators, the use of nasal high flow therapy (nHF) and a higher starting fraction of inspired oxygen were associated with a higher rate of safe, successful intubation on the first attempt. There was a weaker association between premedication use and first attempt success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In inexperienced operators, this secondary, non-randomised analysis suggests that the use of nHF and premedications, and matching the operator to the infant and setting, may be important to optimise neonatal intubation success.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ACTRN12618001498280.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neonatal endotracheal intubation is a lifesaving but technically difficult procedure, particularly for inexperienced operators. This secondary analysis in a subgroup of inexperienced operators of the Stabilization with nasal High flow during Intubation of NEonates randomised trial aimed to identify the factors associated with successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological stability of the infant.

Methods: In this secondary analysis, demographic factors were compared between infants intubated by inexperienced operators and those intubated by experienced operators. Following this, for inexperienced operators only, predictors of successful intubation without physiological instability were analysed.

Results: A total of 251 intubations in 202 infants were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis of the main trial. Inexperienced operators were more likely to perform intubations in larger and more mature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit where premedications were used. When intubations were performed by inexperienced operators, the use of nasal high flow therapy (nHF) and a higher starting fraction of inspired oxygen were associated with a higher rate of safe, successful intubation on the first attempt. There was a weaker association between premedication use and first attempt success.

Conclusions: In inexperienced operators, this secondary, non-randomised analysis suggests that the use of nHF and premedications, and matching the operator to the infant and setting, may be important to optimise neonatal intubation success.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12618001498280.

缺乏经验的操作者成功进行新生儿插管的预测因素:SHINE 试验的二次非随机分析。
目的:新生儿气管插管是一项挽救生命的手术,但在技术上难度很大,尤其是对缺乏经验的操作者而言。这项针对新生儿气管插管过程中使用鼻腔高流量稳定的随机试验中缺乏经验的操作者亚组的二次分析旨在确定在婴儿生理状态不稳定的情况下首次尝试成功插管的相关因素:在这项二次分析中,比较了由经验不足的操作员插管的婴儿和由经验丰富的操作员插管的婴儿的人口统计学因素。然后,仅针对无经验操作者,分析了在无生理不稳定情况下成功插管的预测因素:主要试验的主要意向治疗分析共纳入了 202 名婴儿的 251 次插管。在使用预处理药物的新生儿重症监护室中,经验不足的操作者更有可能为体型较大、发育较成熟的婴儿进行插管。在由经验不足的操作员进行插管时,使用鼻腔高流量疗法(nHF)和较高的起始吸氧分数与较高的首次插管安全成功率有关。使用预处理药物与首次尝试成功率之间的关系较弱:对于缺乏经验的操作者,这项次要的非随机分析表明,使用 nHF 和预处理药物,并使操作者与婴儿和环境相匹配,对于优化新生儿插管成功率可能很重要:ACTRN12618001498280。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信