A quantitative analysis of vertebrate environmental DNA degradation in soil in response to time, UV light, and temperature

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1002/edn3.581
Austin M. Guthrie, Christine E. Cooper, Philip W. Bateman, Mieke van der Heyde, Morten E. Allentoft, Paul Nevill
{"title":"A quantitative analysis of vertebrate environmental DNA degradation in soil in response to time, UV light, and temperature","authors":"Austin M. Guthrie,&nbsp;Christine E. Cooper,&nbsp;Philip W. Bateman,&nbsp;Mieke van der Heyde,&nbsp;Morten E. Allentoft,&nbsp;Paul Nevill","doi":"10.1002/edn3.581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) degradation influences the effectiveness of eDNA-based biodiversity monitoring, but the factors that determine the rate of decay of eDNA in terrestrial environments are poorly understood. We assessed the persistence of vertebrate eDNA from a mock vertebrate community created with soil from zoo enclosures holding 10 target species from different taxonomic classes (reptiles, birds, and mammals) and of different biomass (little penguin and giraffe). We examined species detection rates resulting from eDNA metabarcoding, as well as relative eDNA concentrations via qPCR, from soil samples over eight time points (0–12 weeks), during exposure to three ambient temperatures (10, 25, and 40°C) and three levels of ultraviolet B (UV-B) radiation (0%, 50%, and 100% intensity). We recorded considerable variation in detectability between species, independent of temperature, and UV-B effects. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) indicated degradation of eDNA over time for all temperature and UV treatments, although it was still possible to detect eDNA from some species after 12 weeks. Degradation rates were lowest for high UV-B treatments, presumably due to UV-B reducing bacterial metabolism. The temperatures investigated did not influence eDNA decay. Our results indicate that eDNA in soil can persist under a range of temperatures and high UV radiation for longer than expected. Sheltered sites with minimal UV-B radiation, which have previously been considered ideal sites for terrestrial eDNA collection, may not be optimal for eDNA persistence in some cases due to microbial decay. A better understanding of eDNA degradation in terrestrial environments is needed to enhance the accuracy of eDNA metabarcoding for surveying terrestrial vertebrate communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.581","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) degradation influences the effectiveness of eDNA-based biodiversity monitoring, but the factors that determine the rate of decay of eDNA in terrestrial environments are poorly understood. We assessed the persistence of vertebrate eDNA from a mock vertebrate community created with soil from zoo enclosures holding 10 target species from different taxonomic classes (reptiles, birds, and mammals) and of different biomass (little penguin and giraffe). We examined species detection rates resulting from eDNA metabarcoding, as well as relative eDNA concentrations via qPCR, from soil samples over eight time points (0–12 weeks), during exposure to three ambient temperatures (10, 25, and 40°C) and three levels of ultraviolet B (UV-B) radiation (0%, 50%, and 100% intensity). We recorded considerable variation in detectability between species, independent of temperature, and UV-B effects. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) indicated degradation of eDNA over time for all temperature and UV treatments, although it was still possible to detect eDNA from some species after 12 weeks. Degradation rates were lowest for high UV-B treatments, presumably due to UV-B reducing bacterial metabolism. The temperatures investigated did not influence eDNA decay. Our results indicate that eDNA in soil can persist under a range of temperatures and high UV radiation for longer than expected. Sheltered sites with minimal UV-B radiation, which have previously been considered ideal sites for terrestrial eDNA collection, may not be optimal for eDNA persistence in some cases due to microbial decay. A better understanding of eDNA degradation in terrestrial environments is needed to enhance the accuracy of eDNA metabarcoding for surveying terrestrial vertebrate communities.

Abstract Image

土壤中脊椎动物环境 DNA 降解随时间、紫外线和温度变化的定量分析
环境DNA(eDNA)的降解会影响基于eDNA的生物多样性监测的有效性,但人们对决定陆地环境中eDNA降解速度的因素知之甚少。我们评估了一个模拟脊椎动物群落中脊椎动物 eDNA 的持久性,该群落是用动物园围栏中的土壤创建的,围栏中的 10 个目标物种来自不同的分类学类别(爬行动物、鸟类和哺乳动物)和不同的生物量(小企鹅和长颈鹿)。在暴露于三种环境温度(10、25 和 40°C)和三种水平的紫外线 B(UV-B)辐射(0%、50% 和 100% 强度)期间,我们对八个时间点(0-12 周)土壤样本中的 eDNA 代谢编码产生的物种检出率以及通过 qPCR 检测的相对 eDNA 浓度进行了研究。我们发现,不同物种之间的可检测性差异很大,与温度和紫外线 B 的影响无关。定量聚合酶链反应(PCR)表明,随着时间的推移,所有温度和紫外线处理下的 eDNA 都会发生降解,尽管在 12 周后仍能检测到某些物种的 eDNA。高紫外线-B 处理的降解率最低,这可能是由于紫外线-B 减少了细菌的新陈代谢。所研究的温度对 eDNA 的衰变没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,土壤中的 eDNA 在不同温度和高紫外线辐射下的存活时间比预期的要长。以往被认为是采集陆地 eDNA 理想地点的紫外线-B 辐射最小的隐蔽地点,由于微生物的衰变,在某些情况下可能不是 eDNA 持久性的最佳地点。需要更好地了解陆地环境中的 eDNA 降解,以提高用于陆地脊椎动物群落调查的 eDNA 代谢标码的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信