Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Strategies and considerations for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning studies.

Contraception Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110534
Nicole Quinones, Liza Fuentes, Asha Hassan, Anna K Hing, Goleen Samari, Monica McLemore
{"title":"Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Strategies and considerations for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning studies.","authors":"Nicole Quinones, Liza Fuentes, Asha Hassan, Anna K Hing, Goleen Samari, Monica McLemore","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Family planning researchers have not critically engaged with topics of race, racism, and associated concepts like ethnicity. This lack of engagement contributes to the reproduction of research that reifies racial hierarchies rather than illuminate and interrupt the processes by which racism affects health. This Research Practice Support paper lays out considerations and best practices for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning research.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We are scholars with racialized identities and expertise in racial health equity in family planning research. We draw from scholarship and guidance across disciplines to examine common shortcomings in the use and analysis of race and racism and propose practices for rigorous use of these concepts in quantitative family planning research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recommend articulating the role of race and racism in the development of the research question, authorship and positionality, study design, data collection, analytic approach, and interpretation of analyses. Definitions of relevant concepts and additional resources are provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family planning and racism are inextricably linked. Failing to name and analyze the pathways through which structural racism affects family planning, and the people who need or want to plan if, when, or how to become pregnant or parent may reproduce harmful and incorrect beliefs about the causes of health inequities and the attributes of Black, Indigenous, and other people racialized as non-White. Family planning researchers should critically study racism and race with procedures grounded in appropriate and articulated theory, evidence, and analytic approaches.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Family planning research can better contribute to efforts to eliminate racialized health inequities and avoid perpetuating harmful beliefs and conceptualizations of race by ensuring that they study race and racism with procedures grounded in appropriate and articulated theory, evidence, and analytic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Family planning researchers have not critically engaged with topics of race, racism, and associated concepts like ethnicity. This lack of engagement contributes to the reproduction of research that reifies racial hierarchies rather than illuminate and interrupt the processes by which racism affects health. This Research Practice Support paper lays out considerations and best practices for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning research.

Study design: We are scholars with racialized identities and expertise in racial health equity in family planning research. We draw from scholarship and guidance across disciplines to examine common shortcomings in the use and analysis of race and racism and propose practices for rigorous use of these concepts in quantitative family planning research.

Results: We recommend articulating the role of race and racism in the development of the research question, authorship and positionality, study design, data collection, analytic approach, and interpretation of analyses. Definitions of relevant concepts and additional resources are provided.

Conclusions: Family planning and racism are inextricably linked. Failing to name and analyze the pathways through which structural racism affects family planning, and the people who need or want to plan if, when, or how to become pregnant or parent may reproduce harmful and incorrect beliefs about the causes of health inequities and the attributes of Black, Indigenous, and other people racialized as non-White. Family planning researchers should critically study racism and race with procedures grounded in appropriate and articulated theory, evidence, and analytic approaches.

Implications: Family planning research can better contribute to efforts to eliminate racialized health inequities and avoid perpetuating harmful beliefs and conceptualizations of race by ensuring that they study race and racism with procedures grounded in appropriate and articulated theory, evidence, and analytic approaches.

在计划生育定量研究中处理种族和种族主义问题的策略和考虑因素。
目的:计划生育研究人员并没有批判性地参与到种族、种族主义和相关概念(如民族)的研究中。这种缺乏参与的现象导致了研究的重复,使种族等级制度得以重现,而不是揭示和打断种族主义影响健康的过程。本研究实践支持文件阐述了在计划生育定量研究中解决种族和种族主义问题的注意事项和最佳实践:研究设计:我们是在计划生育研究中具有种族化身份和种族健康平等专业知识的学者。我们借鉴了各学科的学术成果和指导意见,研究了在使用和分析种族与种族主义方面的常见缺陷,并提出了在计划生育定量研究中严格使用这些概念的做法:结果:我们建议阐明种族和种族主义在制定研究问题、作者身份和立场、研究设计、数据收集、分析方法和分析解释中的作用。本文还提供了相关概念的定义和其他资源:计划生育与种族主义密不可分。如果不指出并分析结构性种族主义影响计划生育以及需要或想要计划是否、何时或如何怀孕或为人父母的人的途径,可能会重现关于健康不平等的原因以及黑人、土著人和其他被视为非白人的人的属性的有害且不正确的观念。计划生育研究人员应批判性地研究种族主义和种族问题,研究程序应建立在适当、明确的理论、证据和分析方法基础之上:计划生育研究可以更好地促进消除种族化健康不平等的努力,并避免有害的信念和种族概念的延续,方法是确保他们在研究种族和种族主义时,采用基于适当和明确的理论、证据和分析方法的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信