Age-specific differences in breast cancer treatment between screen-detected and non-screen-detected breast cancers in women aged 40-74 years at diagnosis in Sweden 2008-2017.
Håkan Jonsson, Anne Andersson, Zheng Mao, Lennarth Nyström
{"title":"Age-specific differences in breast cancer treatment between screen-detected and non-screen-detected breast cancers in women aged 40-74 years at diagnosis in Sweden 2008-2017.","authors":"Håkan Jonsson, Anne Andersson, Zheng Mao, Lennarth Nyström","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>We have recently demonstrated that screen-detected invasive breast cancers had more favourable tumour characteristics than non-screen-detected. The objective of the study was to analyse differences in breast cancer treatment between screen-detected and non-screen-detected cases by age at diagnosis, with and without adjustment for tumour (T) and nodal (N) status, within a nationwide, population-based mammography screening programme utilising register data.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data spanning 2008-2017 were collected from the National Quality Register for Breast Cancer. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for treatment disparities between screen-detected and non-screen-detected breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 46,481 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer aged 40-74 and invited for mammography screening, significant differences in treatment were observed. Screen-detected cases showed higher likelihoods of partial mastectomy compared to mastectomy, endocrine therapy, and radiotherapy, whereas chemotherapy and antibody therapy were less likely compared to non-screen-detected cases. However, when adjusting for surgery type, screen-detected cases showed lower likelihoods of radiotherapy. Age at diagnosis significantly influenced treatment odds ratios, with interactions observed for all treatments except radiotherapy adjusted for surgery. Differences increased with age, except for endocrine therapy. Radiotherapy adjusted for surgery type showed no age-related interaction. Adjusting for T and N did not alter these patterns.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In general, screen-detected cases received less aggressive treatment, such as mastectomy, chemotherapy, and antibody therapy, compared to non-screen-detected cases. Disparities increased with age, except for endocrine therapy and radiotherapy adjusted for surgery. Differences persisted after adjusting for T and N, suggesting that these factors cannot solely explain the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"63 ","pages":"552-556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: We have recently demonstrated that screen-detected invasive breast cancers had more favourable tumour characteristics than non-screen-detected. The objective of the study was to analyse differences in breast cancer treatment between screen-detected and non-screen-detected cases by age at diagnosis, with and without adjustment for tumour (T) and nodal (N) status, within a nationwide, population-based mammography screening programme utilising register data.
Material and methods: Data spanning 2008-2017 were collected from the National Quality Register for Breast Cancer. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for treatment disparities between screen-detected and non-screen-detected breast cancer.
Results: Among 46,481 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer aged 40-74 and invited for mammography screening, significant differences in treatment were observed. Screen-detected cases showed higher likelihoods of partial mastectomy compared to mastectomy, endocrine therapy, and radiotherapy, whereas chemotherapy and antibody therapy were less likely compared to non-screen-detected cases. However, when adjusting for surgery type, screen-detected cases showed lower likelihoods of radiotherapy. Age at diagnosis significantly influenced treatment odds ratios, with interactions observed for all treatments except radiotherapy adjusted for surgery. Differences increased with age, except for endocrine therapy. Radiotherapy adjusted for surgery type showed no age-related interaction. Adjusting for T and N did not alter these patterns.
Interpretation: In general, screen-detected cases received less aggressive treatment, such as mastectomy, chemotherapy, and antibody therapy, compared to non-screen-detected cases. Disparities increased with age, except for endocrine therapy and radiotherapy adjusted for surgery. Differences persisted after adjusting for T and N, suggesting that these factors cannot solely explain the results.
背景和目的:我们最近证明,筛查出的浸润性乳腺癌比未筛查出的乳腺癌具有更有利的肿瘤特征。本研究旨在利用登记册数据,在一项全国性、基于人群的乳腺 X 射线筛查计划中,分析筛查出和未筛查出病例在诊断年龄上的乳腺癌治疗差异,包括是否调整肿瘤(T)和结节(N)状态:从全国乳腺癌质量登记册中收集了2008-2017年的数据。采用多变量逻辑回归分析估算筛查出和未筛查出乳腺癌之间治疗差异的几率比和95%置信区间:在 46,481 名被诊断为浸润性乳腺癌的 40-74 岁女性中,受邀进行乳房 X 射线照相筛查的女性在治疗方面存在显著差异。与乳房切除术、内分泌治疗和放射治疗相比,筛查出的病例接受部分乳房切除术的可能性更高,而与未筛查出的病例相比,化疗和抗体治疗的可能性较低。然而,在对手术类型进行调整后,筛查出的病例接受放疗的几率较低。诊断时的年龄对治疗几率比有明显影响,除放疗外,所有治疗均与手术调整后的几率比存在交互作用。除内分泌治疗外,其他治疗的差异随年龄的增长而增大。放疗根据手术类型进行调整后,未发现与年龄相关的交互作用。对T和N进行调整并没有改变这些模式:总的来说,与未通过筛查的病例相比,通过筛查发现的病例接受的乳房切除术、化疗和抗体治疗等积极治疗较少。除了内分泌治疗和放疗外,随着年龄的增长,手术治疗的差异也会增大。在对T和N进行调整后,差异依然存在,这表明这些因素不能完全解释结果。
期刊介绍:
Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.