Perioperative hypotension and use of vasoactive agents in non-cardiac surgery: A scoping review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1111/aas.14485
Emilie Stokholm Bækgaard, Bennedikte Kollerup Madsen, Vera Crone, Hayan El-Hallak, Morten Hylander Møller, Morten Vester-Andersen, Mette Krag
{"title":"Perioperative hypotension and use of vasoactive agents in non-cardiac surgery: A scoping review.","authors":"Emilie Stokholm Bækgaard, Bennedikte Kollerup Madsen, Vera Crone, Hayan El-Hallak, Morten Hylander Møller, Morten Vester-Andersen, Mette Krag","doi":"10.1111/aas.14485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative hypotension is common and associated with adverse patient outcomes. Vasoactive agents are often used to manage hypotension, but the ideal drug, dose and duration of treatment has not been established. With this scoping review, we aim to provide an overview of the current body of evidence regarding the vasoactive agents used to treat perioperative hypotension in non-cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all studies describing the use of vasoactive agents for the treatment of perioperative hypotension in non-cardiac surgery. We excluded literature reviews, case studies, and studies on animals and healthy subjects. We posed the following research questions: (1) in which surgical populations have vasoactive agents been studied? (2) which agents have been studied? (3) what doses have been assessed? (4) what is the duration of treatment? and (5) which desirable and undesirable outcomes have been assessed?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 124 studies representing 10 surgical specialties. Eighteen different agents were evaluated, predominantly phenylephrine, ephedrine, and noradrenaline. The agents were administered through six different routes, and numerous comparisons between agents, dosages and routes were included. Then, 88 distinct outcome measures were assessed, of which 54 were judged to be non-patient-centred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that studies concerning vasoactive agents for the treatment of perioperative hypotension varied considerably in all aspects. Populations were heterogeneous, interventions and exposures included multiple agents compared against themselves, each other, fluids or placebo, and studies reported primarily non-patient-centred outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perioperative hypotension is common and associated with adverse patient outcomes. Vasoactive agents are often used to manage hypotension, but the ideal drug, dose and duration of treatment has not been established. With this scoping review, we aim to provide an overview of the current body of evidence regarding the vasoactive agents used to treat perioperative hypotension in non-cardiac surgery.

Methods: We included all studies describing the use of vasoactive agents for the treatment of perioperative hypotension in non-cardiac surgery. We excluded literature reviews, case studies, and studies on animals and healthy subjects. We posed the following research questions: (1) in which surgical populations have vasoactive agents been studied? (2) which agents have been studied? (3) what doses have been assessed? (4) what is the duration of treatment? and (5) which desirable and undesirable outcomes have been assessed?

Results: We included 124 studies representing 10 surgical specialties. Eighteen different agents were evaluated, predominantly phenylephrine, ephedrine, and noradrenaline. The agents were administered through six different routes, and numerous comparisons between agents, dosages and routes were included. Then, 88 distinct outcome measures were assessed, of which 54 were judged to be non-patient-centred.

Conclusions: We found that studies concerning vasoactive agents for the treatment of perioperative hypotension varied considerably in all aspects. Populations were heterogeneous, interventions and exposures included multiple agents compared against themselves, each other, fluids or placebo, and studies reported primarily non-patient-centred outcomes.

非心脏手术中围手术期低血压和血管活性药物的使用:范围综述。
背景:围手术期低血压很常见,并与患者的不良预后有关。血管活性药物通常用于控制低血压,但理想的药物、剂量和疗程尚未确定。通过此次范围界定综述,我们旨在概述目前用于治疗非心脏手术围术期低血压的血管活性药物的相关证据:我们纳入了所有描述使用血管活性药物治疗非心脏手术围手术期低血压的研究。我们排除了文献综述、病例研究以及针对动物和健康受试者的研究。我们提出了以下研究问题:(1) 在哪些手术人群中研究过血管活性药物? (2) 研究过哪些药物? (3) 评估过哪些剂量?(4) 治疗持续时间是多长? (5) 评估了哪些理想和不理想的结果?我们纳入了代表 10 个外科专科的 124 项研究。评估了 18 种不同的药物,主要是苯肾上腺素、麻黄碱和去甲肾上腺素。这些药物通过六种不同的途径给药,并对不同药物、剂量和途径进行了大量比较。然后,评估了 88 项不同的结果指标,其中 54 项被判定为非以患者为中心:我们发现,有关血管活性药物治疗围手术期低血压的研究在各个方面都存在很大差异。研究人群不尽相同,干预和暴露包括多种药物与自身、相互、液体或安慰剂的比较,研究报告的结果主要不是以患者为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信