Enhancement and formal verification of the ICC mechanism with a sandbox approach in android system

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Jiaqi Yin, Sini Chen, Yixiao Lv, Huibiao Zhu
{"title":"Enhancement and formal verification of the ICC mechanism with a sandbox approach in android system","authors":"Jiaqi Yin, Sini Chen, Yixiao Lv, Huibiao Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s11219-024-09684-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inter-Component Communication (ICC) plays a crucial role in facilitating information exchange and functionality integration within the complex ecosystem of Android systems. However, the security and safety implications arising from ICC interactions pose significant challenges. This paper is an extended work building upon our previously published research that focuses on the verification of safety properties in the ICC mechanism. We address the previously observed issues of data leakage and privilege escalation by incorporating a sandbox mechanism and permission control. The sandbox mechanism provides an isolated and controlled environment in which ICC components can operate while permission control mechanisms are introduced to enforce fine-grained access controls, ensuring that only authorized entities have access to sensitive resources. We further leverage formal methods, specifically communicating sequential processes (CSP), to verify several properties of the enhanced ICC mechanism. By employing CSP, we aim to systematically model and analyze the flow of information, the behavior of components, and the potential vulnerabilities associated with the enhanced ICC mechanism. The verification results highlight the effectiveness of our approach in enhancing the security and reliability of ICC mechanisms, ultimately contributing to the development of safer and more trustworthy Android Systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":21827,"journal":{"name":"Software Quality Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Quality Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-024-09684-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inter-Component Communication (ICC) plays a crucial role in facilitating information exchange and functionality integration within the complex ecosystem of Android systems. However, the security and safety implications arising from ICC interactions pose significant challenges. This paper is an extended work building upon our previously published research that focuses on the verification of safety properties in the ICC mechanism. We address the previously observed issues of data leakage and privilege escalation by incorporating a sandbox mechanism and permission control. The sandbox mechanism provides an isolated and controlled environment in which ICC components can operate while permission control mechanisms are introduced to enforce fine-grained access controls, ensuring that only authorized entities have access to sensitive resources. We further leverage formal methods, specifically communicating sequential processes (CSP), to verify several properties of the enhanced ICC mechanism. By employing CSP, we aim to systematically model and analyze the flow of information, the behavior of components, and the potential vulnerabilities associated with the enhanced ICC mechanism. The verification results highlight the effectiveness of our approach in enhancing the security and reliability of ICC mechanisms, ultimately contributing to the development of safer and more trustworthy Android Systems.

Abstract Image

在安卓系统中采用沙盒方法增强和正式验证 ICC 机制
组件间通信(ICC)在促进安卓系统复杂生态系统内的信息交换和功能集成方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,ICC 交互带来的安全性和安全影响构成了重大挑战。本文是在我们之前发表的研究基础上进行的扩展工作,重点关注 ICC 机制中安全属性的验证。我们通过引入沙盒机制和权限控制,解决了之前观察到的数据泄露和权限升级问题。沙箱机制为 ICC 组件的运行提供了一个隔离和受控的环境,而权限控制机制则用于执行细粒度访问控制,确保只有授权实体才能访问敏感资源。我们进一步利用形式方法,特别是通信顺序进程(CSP),来验证增强型 ICC 机制的若干属性。通过使用 CSP,我们旨在系统地模拟和分析信息流、组件行为以及与增强型 ICC 机制相关的潜在漏洞。验证结果凸显了我们的方法在增强 ICC 机制的安全性和可靠性方面的有效性,最终有助于开发更安全、更可信的 Android 系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Software Quality Journal
Software Quality Journal 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Software Quality Journal are: (1) To promote awareness of the crucial role of quality management in the effective construction of the software systems developed, used, and/or maintained by organizations in pursuit of their business objectives. (2) To provide a forum of the exchange of experiences and information on software quality management and the methods, tools and products used to measure and achieve it. (3) To provide a vehicle for the publication of academic papers related to all aspects of software quality. The Journal addresses all aspects of software quality from both a practical and an academic viewpoint. It invites contributions from practitioners and academics, as well as national and international policy and standard making bodies, and sets out to be the definitive international reference source for such information. The Journal will accept research, technique, case study, survey and tutorial submissions that address quality-related issues including, but not limited to: internal and external quality standards, management of quality within organizations, technical aspects of quality, quality aspects for product vendors, software measurement and metrics, software testing and other quality assurance techniques, total quality management and cultural aspects. Other technical issues with regard to software quality, including: data management, formal methods, safety critical applications, and CASE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信