Cost-benefit analysis of a detached breakwater for coastal protection: a case study in the Portuguese seaside

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rita Pombo, Peter Roebeling, Carlos Coelho
{"title":"Cost-benefit analysis of a detached breakwater for coastal protection: a case study in the Portuguese seaside","authors":"Rita Pombo, Peter Roebeling, Carlos Coelho","doi":"10.1007/s11852-024-01060-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Defining the most suitable intervention to mitigate coastal hazards in a specific area, under an integrated coastal management strategy, is complex for several reasons including the lack of stakeholders’ consensus. In this respect, Cost-Benefit Analyses (CBAs) can help decision-makers to better understand the environmental, social and economic implications of a planned intervention. Nevertheless, CBAs are not yet largely applied in coastal management studies, as could be expected. Hence, this work aims to consolidate the use of a CBA to support coastal management decisions, considering its application to a real case study. The case study consists in evaluating the long-term impacts, benefits and costs of a detached breakwater for the protection of a coastal village located on the Portuguese northwest coast against flooding and erosion. This assessment was made based on the estimation of the costs of the structure and the benefits associated with the protection of the coastal community and natural areas, considering morphodynamics’ forecasts determined through numerical modelling. Out of several configurations defined based on length (L; in meters) and distance to the shoreline (D; in meters), four detached breakwater scenarios were selected. Results demonstrate that scenario L200D200 can be a feasible solution with overall low costs and low benefits; L300D400 can be an alternative solution with higher costs but higher benefits too. The consolidation of the CBA described is a step forward to improving the expedition of future analysis and proof of its potential in what concerns analysis at the local scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":48909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Coastal Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Coastal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-024-01060-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Defining the most suitable intervention to mitigate coastal hazards in a specific area, under an integrated coastal management strategy, is complex for several reasons including the lack of stakeholders’ consensus. In this respect, Cost-Benefit Analyses (CBAs) can help decision-makers to better understand the environmental, social and economic implications of a planned intervention. Nevertheless, CBAs are not yet largely applied in coastal management studies, as could be expected. Hence, this work aims to consolidate the use of a CBA to support coastal management decisions, considering its application to a real case study. The case study consists in evaluating the long-term impacts, benefits and costs of a detached breakwater for the protection of a coastal village located on the Portuguese northwest coast against flooding and erosion. This assessment was made based on the estimation of the costs of the structure and the benefits associated with the protection of the coastal community and natural areas, considering morphodynamics’ forecasts determined through numerical modelling. Out of several configurations defined based on length (L; in meters) and distance to the shoreline (D; in meters), four detached breakwater scenarios were selected. Results demonstrate that scenario L200D200 can be a feasible solution with overall low costs and low benefits; L300D400 can be an alternative solution with higher costs but higher benefits too. The consolidation of the CBA described is a step forward to improving the expedition of future analysis and proof of its potential in what concerns analysis at the local scale.

Abstract Image

用于海岸保护的独立防波堤的成本效益分析:葡萄牙海滨案例研究
由于缺乏利益相关者的共识等原因,在沿海综合管理战略下,确定最合适的干预措 施来减轻特定地区的沿海灾害是十分复杂的。在这方面,成本效益分析(CBAs)可以帮助决策者更好地了解计划干预措施对环 境、社会和经济的影响。然而,成本效益分析在沿海管理研究中的应用还不多,这也是意料之中的事。因此,这项工作的目的是,考虑将成本效益分析应用到实际案例研究中,巩固成本效益 分析在支持沿海管理决策中的应用。该案例研究包括评估一个独立防波堤的长期影响、效益和成本,该防波堤用于保护葡 萄牙西北海岸的一个沿海村庄免受洪水和侵蚀。该评估基于对结构成本的估算以及与保护沿海社区和自然区域相关的效益,并考虑了通过数值模型确定的形态动力学预测。在根据长度(L,以米为单位)和海岸线距离(D,以米为单位)确定的几种结构中,选择了四种独立防波堤方案。结果表明,L200D200 方案是一个可行的解决方案,总体成本低、收益低;L300D400 方案是一个替代方案,成本较高,但收益也较高。对所描述的成本效益分析进行整合,为提高未来分析的速度迈出了一步,也证明了其在地方尺度分析方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Coastal Conservation
Journal of Coastal Conservation ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Coastal Conservation is a scientific journal for the dissemination of both theoretical and applied research on integrated and sustainable management of the terrestrial, coastal and marine environmental interface. A thorough understanding of both the physical and the human sciences is important to the study of the spatial patterns and processes observed in terrestrial, coastal and marine systems set in the context of past, present and future social and economic developments. This includes multidisciplinary and integrated knowledge and understanding of: physical geography, coastal geomorphology, sediment dynamics, hydrodynamics, soil science, hydrology, plant and animal ecology, vegetation science, biogeography, landscape ecology, recreation and tourism studies, urban and human ecology, coastal engineering and spatial planning, coastal zone management, and marine resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信