My part is bigger than yours -- assessment within a group of peers using the pairwise comparisons method

Konrad Kułakowski, Jacek Szybowski
{"title":"My part is bigger than yours -- assessment within a group of peers using the pairwise comparisons method","authors":"Konrad Kułakowski, Jacek Szybowski","doi":"arxiv-2407.01843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A project (e.g. writing a collaborative research paper) is often a group\neffort. At the end, each contributor identifies his or her contribution, often\nverbally. The reward, however, is quite often financial in nature. This leads\nto the question of what (percentage) share in the creation of the paper is due\nto individual authors. Different authors may have various opinions on the\nmatter, and, even worse, their opinions may have different relevance. In this\npaper, we present a simple models that allows aggregation of experts' opinions\nlinking the priority of his preference directly to the assessment made by other\nexperts. In this approach, the greater the contribution of a given expert, the\ngreater the importance of his opinion. The presented method can be considered\nas an attempt to find consensus among a group of peers involved in the same\nproject. Hence, its applications may go beyond the proposed study example of\nwriting a scientific paper.","PeriodicalId":501216,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Discrete Mathematics","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Discrete Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.01843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A project (e.g. writing a collaborative research paper) is often a group effort. At the end, each contributor identifies his or her contribution, often verbally. The reward, however, is quite often financial in nature. This leads to the question of what (percentage) share in the creation of the paper is due to individual authors. Different authors may have various opinions on the matter, and, even worse, their opinions may have different relevance. In this paper, we present a simple models that allows aggregation of experts' opinions linking the priority of his preference directly to the assessment made by other experts. In this approach, the greater the contribution of a given expert, the greater the importance of his opinion. The presented method can be considered as an attempt to find consensus among a group of peers involved in the same project. Hence, its applications may go beyond the proposed study example of writing a scientific paper.
我的部分比你的大 -- 利用成对比较法在同龄人群体中进行评估
一个项目(如撰写合作研究论文)往往是一个团体的努力。项目结束时,每个贡献者通常都会口头确认自己的贡献。然而,奖励往往是金钱性质的。这就产生了作者个人在论文创作中所占份额(百分比)的问题。不同的作者可能对论文有不同的看法,更糟糕的是,他们的看法可能具有不同的相关性。在本文中,我们提出了一个简单的模型,它可以汇总专家的意见,将专家的优先选择与其他专家的评估直接联系起来。在这种方法中,某位专家的贡献越大,其意见的重要性就越高。所介绍的方法可被视为在参与同一项目的同行群体中寻求共识的一种尝试。因此,它的应用可能会超出所提议的撰写科学论文的研究范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信