Adverse sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care in seven low- and middle-income countries: MASC study

Charlotte Hanlon, Heidi Lempp, Atalay Alem, Azeb Asaminew Alemu, Ruben Alvarado, Olatunde Ayinde, Adekunle Adesola, Elaine Brohan, Thandi Davies, Wubalem Fekadu, Oye Gureje, Lucy Jalagania, Nino Makhashvili, Awoke Mihretu, Eleni Misganaw, Maria Milenova, Tamara Mujirishvili, Olha Myshakivska, Irina Pinchuk, Camila Solis-Araya, Katherine Sorsdahl, Gonzalo Soto-Brandt, Ezra Susser, Olga Toro-Devia, Nicole Votruba, Anuprabha Wickramasinghe, Shehan Williams, Graham Thornicroft
{"title":"Adverse sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care in seven low- and middle-income countries: MASC study","authors":"Charlotte Hanlon, Heidi Lempp, Atalay Alem, Azeb Asaminew Alemu, Ruben Alvarado, Olatunde Ayinde, Adekunle Adesola, Elaine Brohan, Thandi Davies, Wubalem Fekadu, Oye Gureje, Lucy Jalagania, Nino Makhashvili, Awoke Mihretu, Eleni Misganaw, Maria Milenova, Tamara Mujirishvili, Olha Myshakivska, Irina Pinchuk, Camila Solis-Araya, Katherine Sorsdahl, Gonzalo Soto-Brandt, Ezra Susser, Olga Toro-Devia, Nicole Votruba, Anuprabha Wickramasinghe, Shehan Williams, Graham Thornicroft","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.18.24309132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A WHO rapid assessment of early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services worldwide found a consistent pattern of degradation. In this context the MASC study aimed to: (1) identify the consequences of the pandemic for mental health services and people with pre-existing mental health conditions (MHCs) in 7 low- and middle-income countries; and (2) identify good practice to mitigate these impacts. The study was conducted in Chile, Ethiopia, Georgia, Nigeria, South Africa, Sri Lanka and Ukraine. This was an observational study, using a mixed-methods convergent design, triangulating data from: (1) 144 key informants participating in semi-structured interviews or focus groups and/or a self-completed survey; (2) routine service utilization data; (3) local grey literature; and (4) expert consultation. We found clear evidence in all sites that the pandemic exacerbated pre-existing disadvantages experienced by people with MHCs and led to a deterioration in the availability and quality of care, especially for psychosocial care. Alongside increased vulnerability to COVID-19, people with MHCs faced additional barriers to accessing prevention and treatment interventions compared to the general population. To varying extents, sites showed accelerated implementation of digital technologies, but with evidence of worsening inequities in access. Where primary care-based mental health care was more developed or prioritised, systems seemed more resilient and adaptive. Our findings have the following implications. First, mental health service reductions are clear examples of ‘structural stigma’, namely policy level decisions in healthcare which place a low priority upon services for people with MHCs. Second, integration of mental health care into all general health care settings is key to ensuring accessibility and parity of physical and mental health care. Third, digital innovations should be designed to strengthen and not fragment systems. We discuss these findings in terms of anticipating such challenges in future and preparing layers of resilience.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.18.24309132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A WHO rapid assessment of early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services worldwide found a consistent pattern of degradation. In this context the MASC study aimed to: (1) identify the consequences of the pandemic for mental health services and people with pre-existing mental health conditions (MHCs) in 7 low- and middle-income countries; and (2) identify good practice to mitigate these impacts. The study was conducted in Chile, Ethiopia, Georgia, Nigeria, South Africa, Sri Lanka and Ukraine. This was an observational study, using a mixed-methods convergent design, triangulating data from: (1) 144 key informants participating in semi-structured interviews or focus groups and/or a self-completed survey; (2) routine service utilization data; (3) local grey literature; and (4) expert consultation. We found clear evidence in all sites that the pandemic exacerbated pre-existing disadvantages experienced by people with MHCs and led to a deterioration in the availability and quality of care, especially for psychosocial care. Alongside increased vulnerability to COVID-19, people with MHCs faced additional barriers to accessing prevention and treatment interventions compared to the general population. To varying extents, sites showed accelerated implementation of digital technologies, but with evidence of worsening inequities in access. Where primary care-based mental health care was more developed or prioritised, systems seemed more resilient and adaptive. Our findings have the following implications. First, mental health service reductions are clear examples of ‘structural stigma’, namely policy level decisions in healthcare which place a low priority upon services for people with MHCs. Second, integration of mental health care into all general health care settings is key to ensuring accessibility and parity of physical and mental health care. Third, digital innovations should be designed to strengthen and not fragment systems. We discuss these findings in terms of anticipating such challenges in future and preparing layers of resilience.
COVID-19 大流行对七个中低收入国家精神卫生保健的不利影响:MASC 研究
世卫组织对 COVID-19 大流行病对全球心理健康服务的早期影响进行了快速评估,发现了一致的退化模式。在此背景下,MASC 研究旨在(1) 确定该流行病对 7 个中低收入国家的精神卫生服务和原有精神健康状况(MHCs)患者造成的影响;以及 (2) 确定减轻这些影响的良好做法。这项研究在智利、埃塞俄比亚、格鲁吉亚、尼日利亚、南非、斯里兰卡和乌克兰进行。这是一项观察性研究,采用了混合方法的聚合设计,对以下数据进行了三角测量:(1) 参加半结构式访谈或焦点小组和/或自我填写调查的 144 名关键信息提供者;(2) 常规服务利用数据;(3) 当地灰色文献;以及 (4) 专家咨询。我们在所有地点都发现了明确的证据,表明大流行加剧了多发性硬化症患者原有的不利处境,导致医疗服务的可用性和质量下降,尤其是社会心理治疗。除了更容易感染 COVID-19 之外,与普通人群相比,多发性硬化症患者在获得预防和治疗干预措施方面还面临更多障碍。不同地区在不同程度上加快了数字技术的应用,但也有证据表明,在获取数字技术方面的不平等现象正在加剧。在以初级保健为基础的精神卫生保健更加发达或优先发展的地方,系统似乎更具弹性和适应性。我们的研究结果具有以下意义。首先,心理健康服务的减少是 "结构性污名化 "的明显例证,即医疗保健政策层面的决策将为精神健康问题患者提供的服务置于次要位置。其次,将心理健康护理纳入所有普通医疗机构是确保身体和心理健康护理的可及性和平等性的关键。第三,数字创新应旨在加强而非割裂系统。我们将从预测未来此类挑战和准备多层次复原力的角度来讨论这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信