Hongwei Tao, Xiaoxu Niu, Lang Xu, Lianyou Fu, Qiaoling Cao, Haoran Chen, Songtao Shang, Yang Xian
{"title":"A comparative study of software defect binomial classification prediction models based on machine learning","authors":"Hongwei Tao, Xiaoxu Niu, Lang Xu, Lianyou Fu, Qiaoling Cao, Haoran Chen, Songtao Shang, Yang Xian","doi":"10.1007/s11219-024-09683-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As information technology continues to advance, software applications are becoming increasingly critical. However, the growing size and complexity of software development can lead to serious flaws resulting in significant financial losses. To address this issue, Software Defect Prediction (SDP) technology is being developed to detect and resolve defects early in the software development process, ensuring high software quality. As a result, SDP research has become a major focus for academics worldwide. This study aims to compare various machine learning-based SDP algorithm models and determine if traditional machine learning algorithms affect SDP outcomes. Unlike previous studies that aimed to identify the best prediction model for all datasets, this paper constructs SDP superiority models separately for different datasets. Using the publicly available ESEM2016 dataset, 13 machine learning classification algorithms are employed to predict software defects. Evaluation indicators such as Accuracy, AUC(Area Under the Curve), F-measure, and Running Time(RT) are utilized to assess the performance of the classification algorithms. Due to the serious class imbalance problem in this dataset, 10 sampling methods are combined with the 13 machine learning algorithms to explore the effect of sampling techniques on the performance of traditional machine learning classification models. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted to identify the best combination of sampling techniques and classification models to construct the final dominant model for SDP.</p>","PeriodicalId":21827,"journal":{"name":"Software Quality Journal","volume":"189 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Quality Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-024-09683-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As information technology continues to advance, software applications are becoming increasingly critical. However, the growing size and complexity of software development can lead to serious flaws resulting in significant financial losses. To address this issue, Software Defect Prediction (SDP) technology is being developed to detect and resolve defects early in the software development process, ensuring high software quality. As a result, SDP research has become a major focus for academics worldwide. This study aims to compare various machine learning-based SDP algorithm models and determine if traditional machine learning algorithms affect SDP outcomes. Unlike previous studies that aimed to identify the best prediction model for all datasets, this paper constructs SDP superiority models separately for different datasets. Using the publicly available ESEM2016 dataset, 13 machine learning classification algorithms are employed to predict software defects. Evaluation indicators such as Accuracy, AUC(Area Under the Curve), F-measure, and Running Time(RT) are utilized to assess the performance of the classification algorithms. Due to the serious class imbalance problem in this dataset, 10 sampling methods are combined with the 13 machine learning algorithms to explore the effect of sampling techniques on the performance of traditional machine learning classification models. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted to identify the best combination of sampling techniques and classification models to construct the final dominant model for SDP.
期刊介绍:
The aims of the Software Quality Journal are:
(1) To promote awareness of the crucial role of quality management in the effective construction of the software systems developed, used, and/or maintained by organizations in pursuit of their business objectives.
(2) To provide a forum of the exchange of experiences and information on software quality management and the methods, tools and products used to measure and achieve it.
(3) To provide a vehicle for the publication of academic papers related to all aspects of software quality.
The Journal addresses all aspects of software quality from both a practical and an academic viewpoint. It invites contributions from practitioners and academics, as well as national and international policy and standard making bodies, and sets out to be the definitive international reference source for such information.
The Journal will accept research, technique, case study, survey and tutorial submissions that address quality-related issues including, but not limited to: internal and external quality standards, management of quality within organizations, technical aspects of quality, quality aspects for product vendors, software measurement and metrics, software testing and other quality assurance techniques, total quality management and cultural aspects. Other technical issues with regard to software quality, including: data management, formal methods, safety critical applications, and CASE.