Erica Scantamburlo, Giovanni F. Gronchi, Giulio Baù
{"title":"Orbit determination from one position vector and a very short arc of optical observations","authors":"Erica Scantamburlo, Giovanni F. Gronchi, Giulio Baù","doi":"10.1007/s10569-024-10201-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we address the problem of computing a preliminary orbit of a celestial body from one topocentric position vector <span>\\(\\mathcal{P}_1\\)</span> and a very short arc (VSA) of optical observations <span>\\(\\mathcal{A}_2\\)</span>. Using the conservation laws of the two-body dynamics, we write the problem as a system of 8 polynomial equations in 6 unknowns. We prove that this system is generically consistent, namely, for a generic choice of the data <span>\\(\\mathcal{P}_1, \\mathcal{A}_2\\)</span>, it always admits solutions in the complex field, even when <span>\\(\\mathcal{P}_1, \\mathcal{A}_2\\)</span> do not correspond to the same celestial body. The consistency of the system is shown by deriving a univariate polynomial <span>\\(\\mathfrak {v}\\)</span> of degree 8 in the unknown topocentric distance at the mean epoch of the observations of the VSA. Through Gröbner bases theory, we also show that the degree of <span>\\(\\mathfrak {v}\\)</span> is minimum among the degrees of all the univariate polynomials solving this problem. Even though we can find solutions to our problem for a generic choice of <span>\\(\\mathcal{P}_1, \\mathcal{A}_2\\)</span>, most of these solutions are meaningless. In fact, acceptable solutions must be real and have to fulfill other constraints, including compatibility with Keplerian dynamics. We also propose a way to select or discard solutions taking into account the uncertainty in the data, if present. The proposed orbit determination method is relevant for different purposes, e.g., the computation of a preliminary orbit of an Earth satellite with radar and optical observations, the detection of maneuvres of an Earth satellite, and the recovery of asteroids which are lost due to a planetary close encounter. We conclude by showing some numerical tests in the case of asteroids undergoing a close encounter with the Earth.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":72537,"journal":{"name":"Celestial mechanics and dynamical astronomy","volume":"355 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Celestial mechanics and dynamical astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-024-10201-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of computing a preliminary orbit of a celestial body from one topocentric position vector \(\mathcal{P}_1\) and a very short arc (VSA) of optical observations \(\mathcal{A}_2\). Using the conservation laws of the two-body dynamics, we write the problem as a system of 8 polynomial equations in 6 unknowns. We prove that this system is generically consistent, namely, for a generic choice of the data \(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{A}_2\), it always admits solutions in the complex field, even when \(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{A}_2\) do not correspond to the same celestial body. The consistency of the system is shown by deriving a univariate polynomial \(\mathfrak {v}\) of degree 8 in the unknown topocentric distance at the mean epoch of the observations of the VSA. Through Gröbner bases theory, we also show that the degree of \(\mathfrak {v}\) is minimum among the degrees of all the univariate polynomials solving this problem. Even though we can find solutions to our problem for a generic choice of \(\mathcal{P}_1, \mathcal{A}_2\), most of these solutions are meaningless. In fact, acceptable solutions must be real and have to fulfill other constraints, including compatibility with Keplerian dynamics. We also propose a way to select or discard solutions taking into account the uncertainty in the data, if present. The proposed orbit determination method is relevant for different purposes, e.g., the computation of a preliminary orbit of an Earth satellite with radar and optical observations, the detection of maneuvres of an Earth satellite, and the recovery of asteroids which are lost due to a planetary close encounter. We conclude by showing some numerical tests in the case of asteroids undergoing a close encounter with the Earth.