National charitable fundraising for the NHS, 1948–2023

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Ellen Stewart, Rosemary Cresswell, Christian Möller
{"title":"National charitable fundraising for the NHS, 1948–2023","authors":"Ellen Stewart, Rosemary Cresswell, Christian Möller","doi":"10.1111/spol.13049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether charitable fundraising might play a part in funding Britain's ostensibly tax‐funded NHS has been a longstanding dilemma, which until recently has received only occasional scholarly attention. In 1946, Aneurin Bevan argued that one of the main goals of the reformed health care system was to liberate health care from the ‘caprice of private charity’. Seven decades later, NHS Charities Together's Urgent Covid‐19 Appeal became a powerful societal rallying cry in the health emergency of the pandemic and raised £150 million in the process. This paper draws together findings from new archival research, a witness seminar with key actors in the NHS charity sector, and qualitative research based on interviews with NHS charity staff and trustees (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 13), all conducted between 2021 and 2023. We investigate the way in which <jats:italic>national</jats:italic> appeals have been proposed, debated and implemented at different times in the NHS's history. We trace the recurrence of conflicting ideas about the acceptability of national fundraising for the NHS, about whether public loyalties are to their local services or the national ‘brand’ and about the introduction of national appeals into a complex ecology of local NHS charities. The history of charitable fundraising for the NHS is, we argue, neither a simple story of spontaneous public generosity, nor often of formal policy reform, but is an artefact of more complex dynamics between a changing cast of local and national actors over the last 75 years.","PeriodicalId":47858,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy & Administration","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether charitable fundraising might play a part in funding Britain's ostensibly tax‐funded NHS has been a longstanding dilemma, which until recently has received only occasional scholarly attention. In 1946, Aneurin Bevan argued that one of the main goals of the reformed health care system was to liberate health care from the ‘caprice of private charity’. Seven decades later, NHS Charities Together's Urgent Covid‐19 Appeal became a powerful societal rallying cry in the health emergency of the pandemic and raised £150 million in the process. This paper draws together findings from new archival research, a witness seminar with key actors in the NHS charity sector, and qualitative research based on interviews with NHS charity staff and trustees (N = 13), all conducted between 2021 and 2023. We investigate the way in which national appeals have been proposed, debated and implemented at different times in the NHS's history. We trace the recurrence of conflicting ideas about the acceptability of national fundraising for the NHS, about whether public loyalties are to their local services or the national ‘brand’ and about the introduction of national appeals into a complex ecology of local NHS charities. The history of charitable fundraising for the NHS is, we argue, neither a simple story of spontaneous public generosity, nor often of formal policy reform, but is an artefact of more complex dynamics between a changing cast of local and national actors over the last 75 years.
1948-2023 年国家医疗服务体系的全国慈善筹款活动
慈善筹款是否能为英国表面上由税收资助的国民医疗保健系统提供资金一直是一个长期存在的难题,直到最近才偶尔得到学者们的关注。1946 年,阿内林-贝文(Aneurin Bevan)认为,医疗保健系统改革的主要目标之一是将医疗保健从 "私人慈善的任性 "中解放出来。七十年后,英国国家医疗服务体系慈善机构共同发出的 "紧急 Covid-19 呼吁 "在大流行病的卫生紧急状况下成为了一个强有力的社会号召,并在此过程中筹集了 1.5 亿英镑。本文汇集了新档案研究、与英国国家医疗服务体系慈善部门主要参与者的见证研讨会以及基于对英国国家医疗服务体系慈善机构工作人员和受托人(N = 13)访谈的定性研究的结果,所有研究均在 2021 年至 2023 年期间进行。我们调查了国家医疗服务体系历史上不同时期提出、辩论和实施国家呼吁的方式。我们追溯了在以下问题上反复出现的相互冲突的观点:NHS 全国性筹款的可接受性;公众忠诚于当地服务还是全国性 "品牌";以及将全国性呼吁引入当地 NHS 慈善机构的复杂生态环境。我们认为,NHS 慈善筹款的历史既不是一个简单的公众自发慷慨解囊的故事,也往往不是一个正式的政策改革的故事,而是过去 75 年中不断变化的地方和国家参与者之间更为复杂的动态关系的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Social Policy & Administration is the longest established journal in its field. Whilst remaining faithful to its tradition in academic excellence, the journal also seeks to engender debate about topical and controversial issues. Typical numbers contain papers clustered around a theme. The journal is international in scope. Quality contributions are received from scholars world-wide and cover social policy issues not only in Europe but in the USA, Canada, Australia and Asia Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信