Durability and cost analysis of a soil stabilized with alkali-activated wastes: fly ash and eggshell powder

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Poonam Shekhawat, Gunwant Sharma, Rao Martand Singh
{"title":"Durability and cost analysis of a soil stabilized with alkali-activated wastes: fly ash and eggshell powder","authors":"Poonam Shekhawat,&nbsp;Gunwant Sharma,&nbsp;Rao Martand Singh","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02011-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geopolymers with the inclusion of waste materials, viz., fly ash and slag, have been considered for various applications as a substitute for non-eco-friendly conventional binder, i.e., cement. Nevertheless, none of the studies have focused on soil stabilization using novel alkali-activated precursors—fly ash and calcium-rich eggshell powder with different curing temperatures. The objective of the present study is to analyze the effect of alkali-activated fly ash and eggshell powder on the durability of reference soft soil mix. The sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide solution were used to activate the precursors. The specimens, with varying percentages of precursors (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%), were heated for 7 days at 25 °C, 50 °C, and 80 °C before subjecting to 12 wetting–drying cycles. The outcomes of the investigation show that the residual strength increases with the increase in geopolymer concentration following a similar pattern of 7-day compressive strength. A decrease in the weight loss of geopolymer-treated clay was detected for the specimens earlier cured at 50 °C. Further, the cost analysis suggested that the eggshell powder–fly ash geopolymer is a much cheaper binder than conventional cement concrete.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02011-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geopolymers with the inclusion of waste materials, viz., fly ash and slag, have been considered for various applications as a substitute for non-eco-friendly conventional binder, i.e., cement. Nevertheless, none of the studies have focused on soil stabilization using novel alkali-activated precursors—fly ash and calcium-rich eggshell powder with different curing temperatures. The objective of the present study is to analyze the effect of alkali-activated fly ash and eggshell powder on the durability of reference soft soil mix. The sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide solution were used to activate the precursors. The specimens, with varying percentages of precursors (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%), were heated for 7 days at 25 °C, 50 °C, and 80 °C before subjecting to 12 wetting–drying cycles. The outcomes of the investigation show that the residual strength increases with the increase in geopolymer concentration following a similar pattern of 7-day compressive strength. A decrease in the weight loss of geopolymer-treated clay was detected for the specimens earlier cured at 50 °C. Further, the cost analysis suggested that the eggshell powder–fly ash geopolymer is a much cheaper binder than conventional cement concrete.

Abstract Image

使用碱活性废物(粉煤灰和蛋壳粉)稳定土壤的耐久性和成本分析
人们已考虑在各种应用中使用含有粉煤灰和矿渣等废料的土工聚合物,以替代非环保的传统粘结剂(即水泥)。然而,这些研究都没有关注使用新型碱激活前体--粉煤灰和富钙蛋壳粉在不同的固化温度下稳定土壤的问题。本研究的目的是分析碱激活粉煤灰和蛋壳粉对参考软土混合物耐久性的影响。使用硅酸钠和氢氧化钠溶液对前体进行活化。使用不同比例的前驱体(10%、20%、30%、40% 和 50%)制作试样,在 25 ℃、50 ℃ 和 80 ℃ 下加热 7 天,然后进行 12 次湿润-干燥循环。研究结果表明,残余强度随着土工聚合物浓度的增加而增加,与 7 天抗压强度的变化规律相似。经过土工聚合物处理的粘土在 50 °C早期固化时,重量损失有所减少。此外,成本分析表明,蛋壳粉-粉煤灰土工聚合物是一种比传统水泥混凝土便宜得多的粘结剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信