Formal long-term care, individualisation and filial responsibility: a multi-level analysis of 21 European countries

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Juha Kääriäinen, Antti O. Tanskanen, Mirkka Danielsbacka
{"title":"Formal long-term care, individualisation and filial responsibility: a multi-level analysis of 21 European countries","authors":"Juha Kääriäinen, Antti O. Tanskanen, Mirkka Danielsbacka","doi":"10.1108/ijssp-03-2024-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Due to the rapid ageing of the continent's population, a significant surge in long-term care expenses for the elderly is expected across Europe in the coming years. Could a potential solution to this challenge involve the increased informal care provided by adult children? In this context, we examined a general view or moral duty of European citizens regarding whether adult children should assume responsibility for providing long-term care to the elderly.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Our multilevel analysis draws on individual-level data from the 2017 European Value Study and country-level data from various European sources encompassing participants from 21 member countries of the European Union.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings reveal that in nations where public long-term care services are sufficiently available and of superior quality, there is a negative sentiment towards the notion that adult children should bear the responsibility for elderly care. In total, 71% of the country-level variance in our dependent variable was explained by the availability and quality of formal long-term care in a country. Furthermore, various individual-level attributes contribute to shaping attitudes towards care-giving responsibility. We observed that women, middle-aged individuals, those without religious affiliations, those with modern gender role attitudes and non-immigrants tended to hold unfavourable attitudes towards the responsibility of adult children in long-term care provision.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>There are relatively many studies on the general attitude of the population towards filial obligation. However, so far there have been very few studies available that examine the population's attitude towards the obligation of adult children to commit to their parents' long-term care. Our research explains the variation of the phenomenon in Europe with both country-level and individual-level factors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-03-2024-0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Due to the rapid ageing of the continent's population, a significant surge in long-term care expenses for the elderly is expected across Europe in the coming years. Could a potential solution to this challenge involve the increased informal care provided by adult children? In this context, we examined a general view or moral duty of European citizens regarding whether adult children should assume responsibility for providing long-term care to the elderly.

Design/methodology/approach

Our multilevel analysis draws on individual-level data from the 2017 European Value Study and country-level data from various European sources encompassing participants from 21 member countries of the European Union.

Findings

The findings reveal that in nations where public long-term care services are sufficiently available and of superior quality, there is a negative sentiment towards the notion that adult children should bear the responsibility for elderly care. In total, 71% of the country-level variance in our dependent variable was explained by the availability and quality of formal long-term care in a country. Furthermore, various individual-level attributes contribute to shaping attitudes towards care-giving responsibility. We observed that women, middle-aged individuals, those without religious affiliations, those with modern gender role attitudes and non-immigrants tended to hold unfavourable attitudes towards the responsibility of adult children in long-term care provision.

Originality/value

There are relatively many studies on the general attitude of the population towards filial obligation. However, so far there have been very few studies available that examine the population's attitude towards the obligation of adult children to commit to their parents' long-term care. Our research explains the variation of the phenomenon in Europe with both country-level and individual-level factors.

正规长期护理、个性化和孝道责任:对 21 个欧洲国家的多层次分析
目的由于欧洲大陆人口迅速老龄化,预计未来几年欧洲老年人的长期护理费用将大幅增加。解决这一挑战的潜在办法是否包括增加成年子女提供的非正式护理?在此背景下,我们研究了欧洲公民对于成年子女是否应承担为老年人提供长期护理的责任的普遍看法或道德义务。我们的多层次分析借鉴了 2017 年《欧洲价值研究》的个人层面数据和来自欧洲各种来源的国家层面数据,包括来自欧盟 21 个成员国的参与者。研究结果研究结果显示,在公共长期护理服务充足且质量上乘的国家,人们对成年子女应承担老年人护理责任的观念持否定态度。在因变量的国家层面变异中,共有 71% 是由一个国家正规长期护理服务的可用性和质量所解释的。此外,个人层面的各种属性也有助于形成对照顾责任的态度。我们观察到,女性、中年人、无宗教信仰的人、具有现代性别角色观念的人和非移民往往对成年子女在提供长期护理方面的责任持不利态度。然而,迄今为止,很少有研究探讨人们对成年子女承担父母长期护理义务的态度。我们的研究从国家和个人两个层面解释了欧洲这一现象的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信