Making Peace with Nature: Ecological Encounters along the Korean DMZ by Eleana Kim (review)

IF 0.3 0 ASIAN STUDIES
June Hee Kwon
{"title":"Making Peace with Nature: Ecological Encounters along the Korean DMZ by Eleana Kim (review)","authors":"June Hee Kwon","doi":"10.1353/ks.2024.a931013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Making Peace with Nature: Ecological Encounters along the Korean DMZ</em> by Eleana Kim <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> June Hee Kwon </li> </ul> <em>Making Peace with Nature: Ecological Encounters along the Korean DMZ</em>, by Eleana Kim. Duke University Press, 2022. 224 pages. $26.95 paperback. <p>Reminders of the Korean peninsula's division have not always been visible or obvious, but they are ubiquitous in the everyday lives of South Koreans. Morning and evening news programs frequently present stories about North Korea's latest missile launches or nuclear experiments, expressing grave concern that the North may attack South Korea and defeat the US military stationed there. Tenacious investigations of those suspected of having pro-North Korean sentiments can be seen as an ongoing political project, regardless of the government's stated political orientation, to consolidate South Korean anti-communist nationalism. Tragic stories about families separated by the Korean War are circulated in the form of documentaries, TV shows, and emotional video clips of government-arranged family reunions. All of these \"division reminders\" have directed the teleological desire for ethnonational unification \"someday\" in South Korea. Yet, as the ambiguous temporality of division, which is temporary but permanent, and hopeful but unpredictable, has diversified the vision of a national future among young South Koreans, the necessity of ethnonational unification has been gradually replaced with a new political rhetoric of \"peace\"—a more universal aspiration beyond national constraints.</p> <p>Of the divided landscape, there is no better marker than the DMZ (demilitarized zone) that materializes and visualizes the ongoing inter-Korean conflict and the temporary peace (or ceasefire) that resulted from the Korean War. The DMZ has played a key role in buffering possible military confrontations (demilitarization) as well as restricting human encroachment with the threat of indiscriminately buried landmines (militarization). Eleana Kim's new book on the highly \"de/militarized\" zone, as the Epilogue title aptly puts it, <em>Making Peace with Nature: Ecological Encounters along the Korean DMZ</em> is a breakthrough ethnography that thoroughly investigates how the untouchable and untouched border zone, has become an exceptional \"nature\" space that generates new knowledge production about inter-species interactions and opens up new possibilities to envision peace with nature.</p> <p>Kim's book stages the DMZ's exceptionality through the intersection of militarism and capitalist desire. As vividly presented in Chapter 4, the South Korean government in the 1960s encouraged poor Koreans to <strong>[End Page 486]</strong> move near the DMZ, which normally had very limited civilian access. The purpose was for them to farm rice there to showcase the prosperity of South Korean border towns. The DMZ is not only remote from any metropolitan area, but there is the danger of randomly buried deadly weapons—landmines. The new tenants cleared the mines to reclaim land for cultivation. They also searched for scrap metal and military waste to supplement their small income from farming. Sometimes, their search resulted in sudden injury or death when they stepped on a landmine. But until their right to compensation was legislated in 2014, the victims remained silent and did not request any official help. This reticence was because of the agreement they signed with the government when they moved to the border towns (p. 127). Kim conceptualizes landmines as \"rogue infrastructure\" in that they, as entanglements between nature, culture, and technology (p. 121), possess unpredictable lifespans, unintentional affordance, and spatiotemporal contingency. In contrast to the rules set forth by the Mine Ban Treaty of 1997, the aberrant actant landmines have been allowed to remain in the DMZ as essential deterrents as well as toxic weapons the US military buried for the sake of Korean exceptionalism. Kim's ethnography shows that the landmine victims believed themselves to be war victims who not only endured fear of state oppression and random death, but also patriots who contributed to national construction by confronting the enemy on the other side of the border.</p> <p>The seemingly long untouched and silent DMZ began to attract particular global attention when the inter-Korea relationship deteriorated, and the South Korean government took a critical neoliberal turn under the successive administrations of Lee Myung Bak and Park Guen Hye. At this time, the South Korean government sought to reorient the DMZ from a war-made conflict...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43382,"journal":{"name":"Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ks.2024.a931013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Making Peace with Nature: Ecological Encounters along the Korean DMZ by Eleana Kim
  • June Hee Kwon
Making Peace with Nature: Ecological Encounters along the Korean DMZ, by Eleana Kim. Duke University Press, 2022. 224 pages. $26.95 paperback.

Reminders of the Korean peninsula's division have not always been visible or obvious, but they are ubiquitous in the everyday lives of South Koreans. Morning and evening news programs frequently present stories about North Korea's latest missile launches or nuclear experiments, expressing grave concern that the North may attack South Korea and defeat the US military stationed there. Tenacious investigations of those suspected of having pro-North Korean sentiments can be seen as an ongoing political project, regardless of the government's stated political orientation, to consolidate South Korean anti-communist nationalism. Tragic stories about families separated by the Korean War are circulated in the form of documentaries, TV shows, and emotional video clips of government-arranged family reunions. All of these "division reminders" have directed the teleological desire for ethnonational unification "someday" in South Korea. Yet, as the ambiguous temporality of division, which is temporary but permanent, and hopeful but unpredictable, has diversified the vision of a national future among young South Koreans, the necessity of ethnonational unification has been gradually replaced with a new political rhetoric of "peace"—a more universal aspiration beyond national constraints.

Of the divided landscape, there is no better marker than the DMZ (demilitarized zone) that materializes and visualizes the ongoing inter-Korean conflict and the temporary peace (or ceasefire) that resulted from the Korean War. The DMZ has played a key role in buffering possible military confrontations (demilitarization) as well as restricting human encroachment with the threat of indiscriminately buried landmines (militarization). Eleana Kim's new book on the highly "de/militarized" zone, as the Epilogue title aptly puts it, Making Peace with Nature: Ecological Encounters along the Korean DMZ is a breakthrough ethnography that thoroughly investigates how the untouchable and untouched border zone, has become an exceptional "nature" space that generates new knowledge production about inter-species interactions and opens up new possibilities to envision peace with nature.

Kim's book stages the DMZ's exceptionality through the intersection of militarism and capitalist desire. As vividly presented in Chapter 4, the South Korean government in the 1960s encouraged poor Koreans to [End Page 486] move near the DMZ, which normally had very limited civilian access. The purpose was for them to farm rice there to showcase the prosperity of South Korean border towns. The DMZ is not only remote from any metropolitan area, but there is the danger of randomly buried deadly weapons—landmines. The new tenants cleared the mines to reclaim land for cultivation. They also searched for scrap metal and military waste to supplement their small income from farming. Sometimes, their search resulted in sudden injury or death when they stepped on a landmine. But until their right to compensation was legislated in 2014, the victims remained silent and did not request any official help. This reticence was because of the agreement they signed with the government when they moved to the border towns (p. 127). Kim conceptualizes landmines as "rogue infrastructure" in that they, as entanglements between nature, culture, and technology (p. 121), possess unpredictable lifespans, unintentional affordance, and spatiotemporal contingency. In contrast to the rules set forth by the Mine Ban Treaty of 1997, the aberrant actant landmines have been allowed to remain in the DMZ as essential deterrents as well as toxic weapons the US military buried for the sake of Korean exceptionalism. Kim's ethnography shows that the landmine victims believed themselves to be war victims who not only endured fear of state oppression and random death, but also patriots who contributed to national construction by confronting the enemy on the other side of the border.

The seemingly long untouched and silent DMZ began to attract particular global attention when the inter-Korea relationship deteriorated, and the South Korean government took a critical neoliberal turn under the successive administrations of Lee Myung Bak and Park Guen Hye. At this time, the South Korean government sought to reorient the DMZ from a war-made conflict...

与自然和平相处:Eleana Kim 所著《朝鲜非军事区的生态遭遇》(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 与自然和平相处:与自然和平相处:朝鲜非军事区的生态遭遇》,作者 Eleana Kim June Hee Kwon:与自然和平相处:朝鲜非军事区的生态邂逅》,作者 Eleana Kim。杜克大学出版社,2022 年。224 页。平装本26.95美元。朝鲜半岛的分裂并不总是显而易见的,但在韩国人的日常生活中却无处不在。早晚新闻节目经常报道朝鲜最新的导弹发射或核试验,表达了对朝鲜可能攻击韩国并击败驻扎在那里的美军的严重担忧。对那些被怀疑有亲朝鲜情绪的人进行顽固调查可以被视为一项持续的政治计划,无论政府的政治取向如何,其目的都是为了巩固韩国的反共民族主义。有关因朝鲜战争而离散的家庭的悲惨故事以纪录片、电视节目和政府安排的家庭团聚的情感视频片段的形式流传。所有这些 "分裂提醒 "都引导着人们 "有朝一日 "在韩国实现民族统一的目的论愿望。然而,分裂的时间性模棱两可,既是暂时的,又是永久的,既充满希望,又难以预测,这使得韩国年轻人对民族未来的憧憬变得多样化,民族统一的必要性逐渐被 "和平 "这一新的政治修辞所取代--"和平 "是一种超越民族限制的更具普遍性的愿望。在四分五裂的格局中,没有比非军事区(DMZ)更好的标志了,它将持续不断的朝韩冲突和朝鲜战争带来的暂时和平(或停火)具体化和形象化。非军事区在缓冲可能发生的军事冲突(非军事化)以及限制人类侵占(军事化)方面发挥了关键作用,而人类侵占则面临着滥埋地雷的威胁。Eleana Kim 关于高度 "非军事化/军事化 "地区的新书《与自然和平相处》(后记标题恰如其分):这是一本突破性的人种学著作,它深入研究了不可触摸和未被触及的边境地区如何成为一个特殊的 "自然 "空间,从而产生了关于物种间互动的新知识,并为设想与自然和平相处开辟了新的可能性。金在书中通过军国主义和资本主义欲望的交织来阐述非军事区的特殊性。正如第 4 章生动介绍的那样,20 世纪 60 年代,韩国政府鼓励贫穷的朝鲜人搬到非军事区附近居住,而非军事区通常只允许极少数平民进入。目的是让他们在那里种植水稻,以展示南朝鲜边境城镇的繁荣。非军事区不仅远离任何大都市,而且还存在随意埋设致命武器--地雷的危险。新租户们清除了地雷,开垦了土地用于耕种。他们还寻找废金属和军事废料,以补充微薄的农业收入。有时,他们在寻找过程中突然踩到地雷,导致受伤或死亡。但在 2014 年立法规定他们有权获得赔偿之前,受害者一直保持沉默,没有请求任何官方帮助。之所以保持沉默,是因为他们在搬迁到边境城镇时与政府签订了协议(第 127 页)。Kim 将地雷概念化为 "流氓基础设施",因为地雷是自然、文化和技术之间的纠葛(第 121 页),具有不可预测的寿命、无意的承受力和时空偶然性。与 1997 年《禁雷公约》规定的规则相反,反常行为地雷被允许留在非军事区内,作为必要的威慑力量,以及美军为朝鲜例外论而埋藏的有毒武器。金氏的人种学研究表明,地雷受害者认为自己是战争受害者,他们不仅忍受着国家压迫和随机死亡的恐惧,而且还是通过对抗边境另一侧的敌人为国家建设做出贡献的爱国者。当韩朝关系恶化,韩国政府在李明博和朴槿惠的相继执政下出现新自由主义批判性转向时,看似长期无人问津和沉默的非军事区开始引起全球的特别关注。此时,韩国政府试图将非军事区从战争制造的冲突中重新定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Studies
Korean Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信