Evaluating Nonlinear Plastic Dilatation Behaviors of Sandstone Using Stress-Dilatancy Models

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Su-Hua Zhou, Zhi-Wen Xu, Shuai-kang Zhou, Yu Ning, Hong-Jie Chen, Jiu-chang Zhang
{"title":"Evaluating Nonlinear Plastic Dilatation Behaviors of Sandstone Using Stress-Dilatancy Models","authors":"Su-Hua Zhou, Zhi-Wen Xu, Shuai-kang Zhou, Yu Ning, Hong-Jie Chen, Jiu-chang Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s40999-024-01008-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sandstones exhibit a complex, stress-dependent behavior characterized by nonlinearity and inelasticity. This study delves into the mechanical properties of sandstone through two distinct triaxial compression experiments: monotonic and cyclic tests, under confining pressures ranging from 0 to 20 MPa. Based on plastic strain analysis, two stress-dilatancy models were developed to describe nonlinear plastic dilatation behaviors. The introduction of the “plastic dilatancy line” concept, derived from comparing plastic dilatancy stresses with crack damage strengths, marks a significant advancement in understanding sandstone’s inelastic models. It was found that the plastic flow directions are not perpendicular to the yield surfaces marked by the characteristic strengths. This indicated that the non-associated flow rule is suitable to describe the macroscopic plastic deformations of sandstone. Furthermore, it was identified confining pressure as the dominant influence on sandstone failure, with cyclic loading modes playing a secondary role. An increase in confining pressure shifts the macroscopic failure modes from splitting-tension to mixed shear-tension, and ultimately to shear failure. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analyses indicated that loading–unloading (L–U) cycles induce more significant mineral grain fragmentation compared to monotonic testing, thereby markedly decreasing sandstone’s failure strength due to accumulated damage from grain-crushing. Additionally, the dip angles of dominant fractures in samples subjected to cyclic tests are typically smaller than that in monotonic tests. This investigation not only sheds light on the complex mechanical behaviors of sandstones but also provides a vital theoretical and practical framework for future research in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":50331,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-01008-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sandstones exhibit a complex, stress-dependent behavior characterized by nonlinearity and inelasticity. This study delves into the mechanical properties of sandstone through two distinct triaxial compression experiments: monotonic and cyclic tests, under confining pressures ranging from 0 to 20 MPa. Based on plastic strain analysis, two stress-dilatancy models were developed to describe nonlinear plastic dilatation behaviors. The introduction of the “plastic dilatancy line” concept, derived from comparing plastic dilatancy stresses with crack damage strengths, marks a significant advancement in understanding sandstone’s inelastic models. It was found that the plastic flow directions are not perpendicular to the yield surfaces marked by the characteristic strengths. This indicated that the non-associated flow rule is suitable to describe the macroscopic plastic deformations of sandstone. Furthermore, it was identified confining pressure as the dominant influence on sandstone failure, with cyclic loading modes playing a secondary role. An increase in confining pressure shifts the macroscopic failure modes from splitting-tension to mixed shear-tension, and ultimately to shear failure. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analyses indicated that loading–unloading (L–U) cycles induce more significant mineral grain fragmentation compared to monotonic testing, thereby markedly decreasing sandstone’s failure strength due to accumulated damage from grain-crushing. Additionally, the dip angles of dominant fractures in samples subjected to cyclic tests are typically smaller than that in monotonic tests. This investigation not only sheds light on the complex mechanical behaviors of sandstones but also provides a vital theoretical and practical framework for future research in this field.

Abstract Image

利用应力-膨胀模型评估砂岩的非线性塑性膨胀行为
砂岩表现出复杂的应力依赖行为,其特点是非线性和非弹性。本研究通过两种不同的三轴压缩实验:单调试验和循环试验,在 0 至 20 兆帕的约束压力下,深入研究砂岩的力学特性。在塑性应变分析的基础上,建立了两个应力膨胀模型来描述非线性塑性膨胀行为。通过比较塑性扩张应力和裂缝破坏强度得出的 "塑性扩张线 "概念的引入,标志着在理解砂岩非弹性模型方面取得了重大进展。研究发现,塑性流动方向并不垂直于以特征强度为标志的屈服面。这表明非关联流动规则适合描述砂岩的宏观塑性变形。此外,研究还发现封闭压力是影响砂岩破坏的主要因素,而循环加载模式则起次要作用。封闭压力的增加会使宏观破坏模式从劈裂-拉伸转变为混合剪切-拉伸,并最终转变为剪切破坏。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析表明,与单调试验相比,加载-卸载(L-U)循环会导致更严重的矿物晶粒破碎,从而明显降低砂岩的破坏强度,这是由于晶粒破碎造成的累积损伤。此外,循环测试样本中主要裂缝的倾角通常小于单调测试中的倾角。这项研究不仅揭示了砂岩复杂的力学行为,还为该领域未来的研究提供了重要的理论和实践框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Civil Engineering, The official publication of Iranian Society of Civil Engineering and Iran University of Science and Technology is devoted to original and interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of civil engineering with similar emphasis on all topics.The journal provides a forum for the International Civil Engineering Community to present and discuss matters of major interest e.g. new developments in civil regulations, The topics are included but are not necessarily restricted to :- Structures- Geotechnics- Transportation- Environment- Earthquakes- Water Resources- Construction Engineering and Management, and New Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信