Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial of coil and anchored needle localization

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ya-Nan Lv, Wen-Tao Zhang, Ying Wang, Gang Wang
{"title":"Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial of coil and anchored needle localization","authors":"Ya-Nan Lv, Wen-Tao Zhang, Ying Wang, Gang Wang","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2024.139198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction</b><br/>In patients with pulmonary nodules (PNs), computed tomography (CT)-guided localization is commonly performed prior to the resection of these nodules through video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).<br/><br/><b>Aim</b><br/>To evaluate the relative clinical efficacy of coil and anchored needle (AN) insertion as approaches to preoperative CT-guided PN localization.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods</b><br/>This single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial (registration number: NCT05183945) enrolled consecutive patients from January 2022 to July 2022, assigning these patients at random to undergo either coil or AN localization prior to VATS. Efficacy and safety outcomes in these two groups were then compared.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>This study enrolled in total 100 patients with 120 PNs who were assigned at random to the coil (patients = 50; PNs = 60) and AN (patients = 50; PNs = 60) localization groups. The respective technical success rates for coil and AN localization were 98.3% (59/60) and 100% (60/60), with no significant difference between the groups (p = 1.000). The coil group had a significantly longer median duration of localization relative to the AN group (16.0 min vs. 8.0 min, p &lt; 0.001). Similar rates of localization-related pneumothorax (8.3% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.715) and pulmonary hemorrhage (5.0% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.110) were observed in both groups. In addition, the VATS resection procedures achieved 100% technical success rates in both of these localization groups.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b><br/>Both coil- and AN-based localization approaches can be successfully employed to localize PNs prior to VATS resection, with the AN localization procedure requiring less time to complete on average as compared to the coil-based approach.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2024.139198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction
In patients with pulmonary nodules (PNs), computed tomography (CT)-guided localization is commonly performed prior to the resection of these nodules through video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).

Aim
To evaluate the relative clinical efficacy of coil and anchored needle (AN) insertion as approaches to preoperative CT-guided PN localization.

Material and methods
This single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial (registration number: NCT05183945) enrolled consecutive patients from January 2022 to July 2022, assigning these patients at random to undergo either coil or AN localization prior to VATS. Efficacy and safety outcomes in these two groups were then compared.

Results
This study enrolled in total 100 patients with 120 PNs who were assigned at random to the coil (patients = 50; PNs = 60) and AN (patients = 50; PNs = 60) localization groups. The respective technical success rates for coil and AN localization were 98.3% (59/60) and 100% (60/60), with no significant difference between the groups (p = 1.000). The coil group had a significantly longer median duration of localization relative to the AN group (16.0 min vs. 8.0 min, p < 0.001). Similar rates of localization-related pneumothorax (8.3% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.715) and pulmonary hemorrhage (5.0% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.110) were observed in both groups. In addition, the VATS resection procedures achieved 100% technical success rates in both of these localization groups.

Conclusions
Both coil- and AN-based localization approaches can be successfully employed to localize PNs prior to VATS resection, with the AN localization procedure requiring less time to complete on average as compared to the coil-based approach.

术前计算机断层扫描引导下的肺结节定位:线圈和锚定针定位的随机对照试验
导言在肺结节(PNs)患者中,通常在通过视频辅助胸腔手术(VATS)切除这些结节之前进行计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下的定位。目的评估线圈和锚定针(AN)插入作为术前CT引导下PN定位方法的相对临床疗效。材料和方法这项单中心、前瞻性、开放标签、随机对照试验(注册号:NCT05183945)从 2022 年 1 月到 2022 年 7 月连续招募患者,随机分配这些患者在 VATS 术前接受线圈或 AN 定位。结果这项研究共招募了 100 名患者,120 个 PNs,随机分配到线圈(患者 = 50;PNs = 60)和 AN(患者 = 50;PNs = 60)定位组。线圈和 AN 定位的技术成功率分别为 98.3%(59/60)和 100%(60/60),组间无显著差异(P = 1.000)。线圈组的定位中位持续时间明显长于 AN 组(16.0 分钟 vs. 8.0 分钟,p < 0.001)。两组中与定位相关的气胸(8.3% vs. 5.0%,p = 0.715)和肺出血(5.0% vs. 13.3%,p = 0.110)发生率相似。结论在 VATS 切除术前,线圈定位法和 AN 定位法均可成功定位 PN,与线圈定位法相比,AN 定位法平均所需时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信