Seeking relief or reward? A utilitarian-hedonic journey perspective on escapism

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Frederic Ponsignon, Matthew Bauman, Renaud Lunardo
{"title":"Seeking relief or reward? A utilitarian-hedonic journey perspective on escapism","authors":"Frederic Ponsignon, Matthew Bauman, Renaud Lunardo","doi":"10.1108/ejm-03-2022-0216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to explores the escapist journey that consumers embark on to reduce self-discrepancy, from the motivation to satisfy personal goals to the fulfilment of these goals. Escapism is a powerful concept for understanding why and how people resolve a perceived self-discrepancy. Previous research has provided rich and diverse insights into the motivations and goals, experience contexts and outcomes that are associated with escapism. However, these notions have been explored in an independent, piecemeal fashion that has hampered the development of cohesive theoretical foundations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors conduct a qualitative study, relying on 33 journeys derived from 20 in-depth interviews, to understand and explain how escapism is initiated, formed and relived.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings document the existence of a predominantly utilitarian and a predominantly hedonic model, articulating why and how consumers pursue distinctly different types of escapist journeys. Utilitarian escapism is primarily concerned with the need to avoid negative emotional states, prompting consumers to decide impulsively to engage into routinised experience contexts to find relief. Hedonic escapism is primarily concerned with the desire to achieve positive emotional states. It involves lengthy and thoughtful anticipation, promotes consumers to pursue experiences in out of the ordinary contexts, and is realised when consumers obtain reward.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This study’s contributions present significant opportunities for further knowledge development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The research findings have substantial practical ramifications for industry.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>Understanding people’s needs to avoid the stress of everyday life (i.e. utilitarian escapism) and their desires to seek out excitement and pleasure (i.e. hedonic escapism) has important societal implications.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research provides a robust theoretical foundation for escapism, one that is applicable across multiple settings. Findings are anchored within existing theory to articulate the notions of utilitarian and hedonic escapism, explaining why and how consumers engage in markedly different escapist journeys.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48401,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Marketing","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-03-2022-0216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to explores the escapist journey that consumers embark on to reduce self-discrepancy, from the motivation to satisfy personal goals to the fulfilment of these goals. Escapism is a powerful concept for understanding why and how people resolve a perceived self-discrepancy. Previous research has provided rich and diverse insights into the motivations and goals, experience contexts and outcomes that are associated with escapism. However, these notions have been explored in an independent, piecemeal fashion that has hampered the development of cohesive theoretical foundations.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conduct a qualitative study, relying on 33 journeys derived from 20 in-depth interviews, to understand and explain how escapism is initiated, formed and relived.

Findings

The findings document the existence of a predominantly utilitarian and a predominantly hedonic model, articulating why and how consumers pursue distinctly different types of escapist journeys. Utilitarian escapism is primarily concerned with the need to avoid negative emotional states, prompting consumers to decide impulsively to engage into routinised experience contexts to find relief. Hedonic escapism is primarily concerned with the desire to achieve positive emotional states. It involves lengthy and thoughtful anticipation, promotes consumers to pursue experiences in out of the ordinary contexts, and is realised when consumers obtain reward.

Research limitations/implications

This study’s contributions present significant opportunities for further knowledge development.

Practical implications

The research findings have substantial practical ramifications for industry.

Social implications

Understanding people’s needs to avoid the stress of everyday life (i.e. utilitarian escapism) and their desires to seek out excitement and pleasure (i.e. hedonic escapism) has important societal implications.

Originality/value

This research provides a robust theoretical foundation for escapism, one that is applicable across multiple settings. Findings are anchored within existing theory to articulate the notions of utilitarian and hedonic escapism, explaining why and how consumers engage in markedly different escapist journeys.

寻求解脱还是奖赏?关于逃避现实的功利主义-hedonic之旅视角
本文旨在探讨消费者为减少自我怀疑而开始的逃避现实之旅,从满足个人目标的动机到这些目标的实现。逃避现实是一个强有力的概念,有助于理解人们为何以及如何解决感知到的自我怀疑。以往的研究对与逃避现实相关的动机和目标、经历背景和结果提供了丰富多样的见解。设计/方法/途径作者进行了一项定性研究,通过对 20 个深度访谈中 33 个旅程的研究,来了解和解释逃避现实是如何开始、形成和重现的。研究结果研究结果记录了一个以功利主义为主的模式和一个以享乐主义为主的模式,阐明了消费者为什么以及如何追求截然不同类型的逃避现实之旅。功利性逃避主要是为了避免负面情绪状态,促使消费者冲动地决定参与常规化的体验情境以寻求解脱。享乐逃避主义主要关注的是实现积极情绪状态的愿望。它需要长时间的深思熟虑,促使消费者在非同寻常的情境中追求体验,并在消费者获得回报时实现。社会意义了解人们避免日常生活压力的需求(即功利性逃避现实)和寻求刺激和快乐的欲望(即享乐性逃避现实)具有重要的社会意义。研究结果以现有理论为基础,阐明了功利性和享乐性逃避现实的概念,解释了消费者为何以及如何进行明显不同的逃避现实之旅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: The EJM is receptive to all areas of research which are relevant to marketing academic research, some examples are: ■Sustainability and ethical issues in marketing ■Consumer behaviour ■Advertising and branding issues ■Sales management and personal selling ■Methodology and metatheory of marketing research ■International and export marketing ■Services marketing ■New product development and innovation ■Retailing and distribution ■Macromarketing and societal issues ■Pricing and economic decision making in marketing ■Marketing models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信