Determining the optimal hematoma volume-based thresholds for surgical and medical strategies in basal ganglia hemorrhage

Chonnawee Chaisawasthomrong, Atthaporn Boongird
{"title":"Determining the optimal hematoma volume-based thresholds for surgical and medical strategies in basal ganglia hemorrhage","authors":"Chonnawee Chaisawasthomrong, Atthaporn Boongird","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.23.24309367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The indication for surgical intervention in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage remains controversial, particularly regarding the benefits of early hematoma drainage via open craniotomy. This study aimed to identify the maximum hematoma volume suitable for conservative treatment and the volume that represents an absolute indication for surgery in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of patients admitted for basal ganglia hemorrhage from 2019 to 2021. The data encompassed personal history, general information and diagnostic imaging records, particularly CT brain scans from the initial ER visit, were examined to ascertain hematoma volume. The comparison focused on evaluating the outcomes of patients who received medical treatment compared to those who underwent surgical intervention, mainly considering various hematoma volumes, and was conducted using multivariate logistic analysis. Results: In a study of 387 cases of basal ganglia hemorrhage, analysis of medical treatment alone across various hematoma volumes revealed that the group with volumes between 10 and 39.9 ml showed no significant difference in mortality compared to the group with volumes less than 10 ml. The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve identified a 45.3 ml cutoff for survival prediction with medical treatment alone. Notably, patients in the subgroup undergoing surgical intervention with a hematoma volume less than 30 ml exhibited significantly higher mortality than those who did not undergo surgery. Conversely, there was a pronounced and statistically significant trend toward increased survival in the group with a hematoma volume of at least 60 ml. Conclusions: The application of medical treatment alone is suitable for hematoma volumes ranging from 0 to 45.3 ml, whereas volumes of 60 ml or more serve as a clear indication for surgical intervention in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage.","PeriodicalId":501051,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.23.24309367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: The indication for surgical intervention in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage remains controversial, particularly regarding the benefits of early hematoma drainage via open craniotomy. This study aimed to identify the maximum hematoma volume suitable for conservative treatment and the volume that represents an absolute indication for surgery in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of patients admitted for basal ganglia hemorrhage from 2019 to 2021. The data encompassed personal history, general information and diagnostic imaging records, particularly CT brain scans from the initial ER visit, were examined to ascertain hematoma volume. The comparison focused on evaluating the outcomes of patients who received medical treatment compared to those who underwent surgical intervention, mainly considering various hematoma volumes, and was conducted using multivariate logistic analysis. Results: In a study of 387 cases of basal ganglia hemorrhage, analysis of medical treatment alone across various hematoma volumes revealed that the group with volumes between 10 and 39.9 ml showed no significant difference in mortality compared to the group with volumes less than 10 ml. The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve identified a 45.3 ml cutoff for survival prediction with medical treatment alone. Notably, patients in the subgroup undergoing surgical intervention with a hematoma volume less than 30 ml exhibited significantly higher mortality than those who did not undergo surgery. Conversely, there was a pronounced and statistically significant trend toward increased survival in the group with a hematoma volume of at least 60 ml. Conclusions: The application of medical treatment alone is suitable for hematoma volumes ranging from 0 to 45.3 ml, whereas volumes of 60 ml or more serve as a clear indication for surgical intervention in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage.
确定基底节出血手术和药物治疗策略的最佳血肿体积阈值
摘要 背景:自发性脑内出血的手术干预指征仍存在争议,尤其是通过开颅手术进行早期血肿引流的益处。本研究旨在确定适合保守治疗的最大血肿量,以及代表基底节出血患者绝对手术指征的血肿量。研究方法对2019年至2021年因基底节出血入院的患者病历进行回顾性分析。数据包括个人病史、一般信息和诊断成像记录,特别是急诊室初诊的脑CT扫描,以确定血肿量。比较重点是评估接受内科治疗的患者与接受外科手术治疗的患者的预后,主要考虑各种血肿量,并采用多变量逻辑分析法进行。研究结果在对 387 例基底节出血病例的研究中,对不同血肿体积的单纯药物治疗进行分析后发现,血肿体积在 10 至 39.9 毫升之间的组别与血肿体积小于 10 毫升的组别相比,死亡率没有显著差异。接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线确定了 45.3 毫升为单纯药物治疗预测生存率的临界值。值得注意的是,在接受手术治疗的亚组中,血肿体积小于 30 毫升的患者死亡率明显高于未接受手术治疗的患者。相反,血肿量至少为 60 毫升的组别中,存活率有明显提高的趋势,且具有统计学意义。结论是血肿量在 0 至 45.3 毫升之间的患者适合单纯采用药物治疗,而血肿量在 60 毫升或以上的基底节出血患者则明确需要手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信