What Do Politicians Think of Technocratic Institutions? Attitudes in the European Parliament Towards the European Central Bank

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Federico M. Ferrara, Donato Masciandaro, Manuela Moschella, Davide Romelli
{"title":"What Do Politicians Think of Technocratic Institutions? Attitudes in the European Parliament Towards the European Central Bank","authors":"Federico M. Ferrara, Donato Masciandaro, Manuela Moschella, Davide Romelli","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technocracy has come to be increasingly regarded as a threat to representative democracy. Significant attention has thus been recently devoted to exploring public preferences towards technocratic institutions. Elected policy‐makers' attitudes have instead not been investigated as systematically. This article fills this gap by examining <jats:italic>politicians</jats:italic>' views on central banks. Based on an original elite survey of the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), we gauged elected policy‐makers' attitudes towards the mandate and policy conduct of the European Central Bank (ECB). Our findings show that the political orientation of politicians largely drives attitudes towards the ECB's institutional mandate. Interestingly, the findings from two experiments embedded in the survey also show that the attitudes of MEPs are not as static as ideological orientations would lead us to expect. The information set to which politicians are exposed significantly shapes their views on both the ECB's mandate and its policy conduct, but less on ECB independence.","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"182 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technocracy has come to be increasingly regarded as a threat to representative democracy. Significant attention has thus been recently devoted to exploring public preferences towards technocratic institutions. Elected policy‐makers' attitudes have instead not been investigated as systematically. This article fills this gap by examining politicians' views on central banks. Based on an original elite survey of the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), we gauged elected policy‐makers' attitudes towards the mandate and policy conduct of the European Central Bank (ECB). Our findings show that the political orientation of politicians largely drives attitudes towards the ECB's institutional mandate. Interestingly, the findings from two experiments embedded in the survey also show that the attitudes of MEPs are not as static as ideological orientations would lead us to expect. The information set to which politicians are exposed significantly shapes their views on both the ECB's mandate and its policy conduct, but less on ECB independence.
政治家如何看待技术官僚机构?欧洲议会对欧洲中央银行的态度
技术民主越来越被视为对代议制民主的威胁。因此,近来人们把大量注意力放在了探索公众对技术官僚体制的偏好上。而民选政策制定者的态度却没有得到如此系统的研究。本文通过研究政治家对中央银行的看法填补了这一空白。基于对欧洲议会议员(MEPs)进行的原创精英调查,我们衡量了民选政策制定者对欧洲中央银行(ECB)的授权和政策行为的态度。我们的研究结果表明,政治家的政治取向在很大程度上决定了他们对欧洲央行机构使命的态度。有趣的是,调查中嵌入的两个实验结果也表明,欧洲议会议员的态度并不像意识形态取向所预期的那样一成不变。政治家们所接触到的信息极大地影响了他们对欧洲央行的职责及其政策行为的看法,但对欧洲央行独立性的看法则影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信