Comparative assessment of two in-house-built isothermal assays for visual detection of African swine fever virus

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Gyanendra Singh Sengar, Soumendu Chakravarti, Rajib Deb, Seema Rani Pegu, Pranav Anjaria, Joyshikh Sonowal, Swaraj Rajkhowa, Pranab Joyti Das, Vivek Kumar Gupta
{"title":"Comparative assessment of two in-house-built isothermal assays for visual detection of African swine fever virus","authors":"Gyanendra Singh Sengar, Soumendu Chakravarti, Rajib Deb, Seema Rani Pegu, Pranav Anjaria, Joyshikh Sonowal, Swaraj Rajkhowa, Pranab Joyti Das, Vivek Kumar Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s12038-024-00451-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Owing to the lack of effective vaccines, current control measures and eradication strategies for the African swine fever virus (ASFV) rely on early detection and stringent stamping-out procedures. In the present study, we developed two independent isothermal amplification assays, namely, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase spiral reaction (PSR), for quick visualization of the ASFV genome in clinical samples. Additionally, a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)-based hydrolysis probe assay was developed for comparative assessment of sensitivity with the developed isothermal assays. The analytical sensitivity of the LAMP, PSR, and qRT-PCR was found to be 2.64 ×10<sup>5</sup> copies/µL, 2.64 ×10<sup>2</sup> copies/µL, and 2.64 ×10<sup>1</sup> copies/µL, respectively. A total of 165 clinical samples was tested using the developed visual assays. The relative accuracy, relative specificity, and relative diagnostic sensitivity for LAMP vs PSR were found to be 95.37% vs 102.48%, 97.46% vs 101.36%, and 73.33% vs 113.33%, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":15171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosciences","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-024-00451-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Owing to the lack of effective vaccines, current control measures and eradication strategies for the African swine fever virus (ASFV) rely on early detection and stringent stamping-out procedures. In the present study, we developed two independent isothermal amplification assays, namely, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase spiral reaction (PSR), for quick visualization of the ASFV genome in clinical samples. Additionally, a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)-based hydrolysis probe assay was developed for comparative assessment of sensitivity with the developed isothermal assays. The analytical sensitivity of the LAMP, PSR, and qRT-PCR was found to be 2.64 ×105 copies/µL, 2.64 ×102 copies/µL, and 2.64 ×101 copies/µL, respectively. A total of 165 clinical samples was tested using the developed visual assays. The relative accuracy, relative specificity, and relative diagnostic sensitivity for LAMP vs PSR were found to be 95.37% vs 102.48%, 97.46% vs 101.36%, and 73.33% vs 113.33%, respectively.

Abstract Image

用于目测检测非洲猪瘟病毒的两种内部自制等温测定法的比较评估
由于缺乏有效的疫苗,目前非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)的控制措施和根除策略依赖于早期检测和严格的淘汰程序。在本研究中,我们开发了两种独立的等温扩增检测方法,即环路介导等温扩增(LAMP)和聚合酶螺旋反应(PSR),用于快速检测临床样本中的非洲猪瘟病毒基因组。此外,还开发了一种基于水解探针的定量实时 PCR(qRT-PCR)检测方法,用于与所开发的等温检测方法进行灵敏度比较评估。结果发现,LAMP、PSR 和 qRT-PCR 的分析灵敏度分别为 2.64 ×105 拷贝/微升、2.64 ×102 拷贝/微升和 2.64 ×101 拷贝/微升。使用所开发的可视化检测方法共检测了 165 份临床样本。结果发现,LAMP 与 PSR 的相对准确性、相对特异性和相对诊断灵敏度分别为 95.37% vs 102.48%、97.46% vs 101.36% 和 73.33% vs 113.33%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biosciences
Journal of Biosciences 生物-生物学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biosciences is a quarterly journal published by the Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore. It covers all areas of Biology and is the premier journal in the country within its scope. It is indexed in Current Contents and other standard Biological and Medical databases. The Journal of Biosciences began in 1934 as the Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Section B). This continued until 1978 when it was split into three parts : Proceedings-Animal Sciences, Proceedings-Plant Sciences and Proceedings-Experimental Biology. Proceedings-Experimental Biology was renamed Journal of Biosciences in 1979; and in 1991, Proceedings-Animal Sciences and Proceedings-Plant Sciences merged with it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信